>To begin with, in general I think this document is on the right path
>and something very close to it should be published. It's
>narrowly-focussed,
Agreed. Let's do these special case TLDLTs (top level domain like
things) one at a time unless there's a group with identical technical
and usage i
* Olafur Gudmundsson:
>> On Mar 18, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>>
>> we need a document that says "If you don't want to answer ANY,
>> here's how to do it interoperably." we don't need to say "you
>> should not answer ANY", but we do need to say "if you want to query
>> for ANY, here's
* Paul Vixie:
>> As a counterexample, RFC 6891 requires FORMERR responses without OPT
>> RRs from implementations which do not support EDNS:
>>
>>Responders that choose not to implement the protocol extensions
>>defined in this document MUST respond with a return code (RCODE) of
>>FORM
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Andrew Sullivan
wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:16:37PM +, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
>> I realized after uploading that I hadn't sent this along for discussion.
>
>> > Name: draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld
>
> I've read th
