* Olafur Gudmundsson: >> On Mar 18, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: >> >> we need a document that says "If you don't want to answer ANY, >> here's how to do it interoperably." we don't need to say "you >> should not answer ANY", but we do need to say "if you want to query >> for ANY, here's what might happen." that, sir, is a killing. we are >> killing ANY. there's no pretense. > > This is exactly what my goal is tell the upstream the type ANY will > not be answered.
Upstream? Is reducing the number of ANY queries an immediate goal of yours? (Discounting any indirect effect that useless ANY answers will have on future application changes.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
