Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 16, 2014, at 10:02 PM, "Guangqing Deng" wrote:
>
> This sounds very needful and useful especially for new comers. And I once had
> been puzzled by "DNS recursive server" and "DNS caching server" for a
> relatively long time.
I still am :)
Steve
>
> Guangqing
This sounds very needful and useful especially for new comers. And I once had
been puzzled by "DNS recursive server" and "DNS caching server" for a
relatively long time.
Guangqing Deng
CNNIC
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date: 2014-07-17 00:07
To: dnsop
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS terminology (Was: d
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:45:16AM -0400, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
> I think you are right we NEED a single document/source that expresses a
> preferred vocabulary
> and translations from common RFC’s to the preferred modern vocabulary.
I will note that the last time DNSEXT came back from the
On Jul 16, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:21:22PM +,
> Hosnieh Rafiee wrote
> a message of 44 lines which said:
>
>> For DNS in general, I saw some terminologies in different RFCs. In
>> other words, they are distributed in different RFCs.
>
>
>I don't think it's practical to revisit every DNS-related RFC and normalise
>the language (enthusiasm to produce a unified DNS specification has never
>resulted in text in the past) but at the very least we could provide some
>assistance to help future document authors use terminology in a con
Hi Hosnieh, Stéphane,
On 16 July 2014 at 11:21:34, Hosnieh Rafiee (hosnieh.raf...@huawei.com) wrote:
> For DNS in general, I saw some terminologies in different RFCs. In other
> words, they are
> distributed in different RFCs. But probably it is a good idea to gather all
> in one RFC like
>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:21:22PM +,
Hosnieh Rafiee wrote
a message of 44 lines which said:
> For DNS in general, I saw some terminologies in different RFCs. In
> other words, they are distributed in different RFCs.
Not only distributed: it is also inconsistent ("resolver" being
sometime
On Jul 16, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> There was no answer to this message. It is clear there is no standard
> DNS terminology, which is often a problem when talking about the
> future of the DNS. Any idea about how to change that? Do we need a
> "DNS terminology" RFC?
This
Hi Stephane,
For DNS in general, I saw some terminologies in different RFCs. In other words,
they are distributed in different RFCs. But probably it is a good idea to
gather all in one RFC like what one of WGs did (If my memory helps me, I guess
it was SACM)
Best,
Hosnieh
-Original Messag
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 01:09:48PM -0700,
John Heidemann wrote
a message of 112 lines which said:
> what do we call the parts of the DNS resolver hierarchy?
>
> draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-dns-privacy-02 defines and uses the terms
...
> I recommend against use of resolver without an adjective fo
10 matches
Mail list logo
