Hi Hosnieh, Stéphane, On 16 July 2014 at 11:21:34, Hosnieh Rafiee (hosnieh.raf...@huawei.com) wrote:
> For DNS in general, I saw some terminologies in different RFCs. In other > words, they are > distributed in different RFCs. But probably it is a good idea to gather all > in one RFC like > what one of WGs did (If my memory helps me, I guess it was SACM) I think it would be useful if we could produce an authoritative taxonomy of the DNS. I agree that many terms are frequently overloaded, and that it causes headaches for me every day. Note that I'm not saying with any certainty that I think it will be possible to produce an authoritative taxonomy that everybody agrees with. But I think it's worth a try, and I'd be happy to volunteer to contribute. I don't think it's practical to revisit every DNS-related RFC and normalise the language (enthusiasm to produce a unified DNS specification has never resulted in text in the past) but at the very least we could provide some assistance to help future document authors use terminology in a consistent fashion. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
