Re: [DNSOP] [rssac] [I-D Action: draft-rssac-dnsop-rfc2870bis-04.txt]

2012-02-11 Thread Paul Vixie
On 2/11/2012 5:25 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > >> I think that starting work on such a draft is a great idea -BUT- in the mean >> time >> do not let "perfect" get in the way of "good enough". > Just to be clear: a good handful of peop

Re: [DNSOP] [rssac] [I-D Action: draft-rssac-dnsop-rfc2870bis-04.txt]

2012-02-11 Thread David Conrad
On Feb 11, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: >> I think that starting work on such a draft is a great idea -BUT- in the >> mean time >> do not let "perfect" get in the way of "good enough". > > Just to be clear: a go

Re: [DNSOP] [rssac] [I-D Action: draft-rssac-dnsop-rfc2870bis-04.txt]

2012-02-11 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > I think that starting work on such a draft is a great idea -BUT- in the > mean time > do not let "perfect" get in the way of "good enough". Just to be clear: a good handful of people, me included, have said that the