- Original Message -
From: "Mark Andrews"
To: "Shane Kerr"
Cc: "Wolfgang Nagele" ;
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:42 AM
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version
Notificationfordraft-mekking-dnsop-auto-cpsync-00
[snip]
>> I do think that George's approach only makes sense if some more wo
In message <1278014471.22848.6352.ca...@shane-asus-laptop>, Shane Kerr writes:
> Wolfgang,
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 20:43 +0200, Wolfgang Nagele wrote:
> >
> > > I think the publication approach is somewhat simpler, at least for the ch
> ild zone.
> > > It's very simple for signing software (in
Wolfgang,
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 20:43 +0200, Wolfgang Nagele wrote:
>
> > I think the publication approach is somewhat simpler, at least for the
> > child zone.
> > It's very simple for signing software (including off-line signers) to
> > generate the "CDS" RRset.
> > Since there are many more
Hi,
> I think the publication approach is somewhat simpler, at least for the child
> zone.
> It's very simple for signing software (including off-line signers) to
> generate the "CDS" RRset.
> Since there are many more child zones than parent zones, this seems
> significant.
Not sure i can agre
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : DNSSEC Key Timing Considerations
Author(s) : S. Morris, et al.
Filename
* Alfred:
> My apologies for cross-posting,
> but this is inherently a cross-wg and cross-area topic:
>
> The revised draft contains clarifications for DNS service discovery
> using SRV RRs and suggests methods to deal with the restrictions
> imposed by draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports. It is intended
