Paul Vixie wrote:
>>So, would it be possible for one or more of the root server operators to
>>prepare a generic-yet-official-looking LOA on suitable "letterhead" and
>>perhaps stash it on www.root-servers.org somewhere?
> in principle, sure.
If anyone, even those with their own root zone conten
> So, would it be possible for one or more of the root server operators to
> prepare a generic-yet-official-looking LOA on suitable "letterhead" and
> perhaps stash it on www.root-servers.org somewhere?
in principle, sure. but i think if it's a form available on the web, then
some enterprising tr
John Crain wrote:
Speculation is all it is and I probably have no better ideas than
many folks here. Be better to try and figure out what is really
happening...
I think this is just a knock on effect from the fact that many folks
don't keep their systems up to date, especially smaller ne
Speculation is all it is and I probably have no better ideas than many
folks here. Be better to try and figure out what is really happening...
I think this is just a knock on effect from the fact that many folks
don't keep their systems up to date, especially smaller networks.
Typically the
Yes - many questions and few answer and very little data available for
the community to figure out those answers. John Crain should publish
stats more often. Why indeed does root behave so strangely. That little
40 percentage thingy indeed does raise alotof questions. John can you
speculate for
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> In the .nl registry system we only need glue for ns1.example.nl if it's in
> the NS set of example.nl.
Interesting, since last week I ended up with hundreds of "glue records"
in the .nl database being wrong, because I changed the IP address of
one
At Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:55:44 +0100,
Peter Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Currently about 60% New IP to 40% old IP... and rising slowly
> >
> > So clearly a lot of folks still need to up date their hints files :(
>
> part of that traffic will be due to old hints files, but priming was
> actu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
old "B" topolgy didnt change... :)
hmm. very demure, and i mean that in a coyly decorous sober sort of way.
i've have an ip range that had roots running on it since the days of the
ORSC. those roots to this day get traffic. Lots of DNS traffic across
al
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:28:47PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:22:41PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > The increase in traffic might easily be due to more favourable
> > > connectivity
> > > to 'B', which would lead many resolver implementations to shift more
> >
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:22:41PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The increase in traffic might easily be due to more favourable connectivity
> > to 'B', which would lead many resolver implementations to shift more queries
> > to it.
> >
> > Bert
> >
>
> old "B" topolgy didnt chan
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:15:59PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:07:59PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > and perhaps more interesting, the old address for "B"
> > showed a tapering off of traffic and then an INCREASE
> > last year. Old L and J got their nu
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:07:59PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> and perhaps more interesting, the old address for "B"
> showed a tapering off of traffic and then an INCREASE
> last year. Old L and J got their numbers less than a
> decade ago. ... so i would not go b
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:58:17AM -0500, Matt Larson wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Peter Koch wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:35:29PM -0800, John Crain wrote:
> >
> > > Currently about 60% New IP to 40% old IP... and rising slowly
> > >
> > > So clearly a lot of folks still need to up date
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:15:51AM -0500, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 27-Nov-2007, at 10:23, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Warren Kumari) writes:
> >
> >>... What do people think about setting up a legal entity called RSTOA
> >>that would then perform some very simple checks before handin
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Peter Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:35:29PM -0800, John Crain wrote:
>
> > Currently about 60% New IP to 40% old IP... and rising slowly
> >
> > So clearly a lot of folks still need to up date their hints files :(
>
> part of that traffic will be due to old hints
On 27-Nov-2007, at 10:23, Paul Vixie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Warren Kumari) writes:
... What do people think about setting up a legal entity called RSTOA
that would then perform some very simple checks before handing out
a LOA?
RSTOA is an existing unincorporated association. you can a
Bill,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:57:13PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:05:55PM -0500, Edward Lewis wrote:
> > At 6:25 PM + 11/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > then we have a small issue... you as zone admin, can't
> > > dictate which IP's i must us
The issue of collecting IP address for name servers in the context of
the APWG draft is not about glue. The issue is not glue but actions
taken to thwart malicious activity.
At 6:46 PM -0500 11/27/07, Brian Dickson wrote:
And that glue is needed only, strictly speaking, when the NS FQDN is a
Moin!
On Nov 28, 2007, at 11:12 , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:55:44AM +0100,
Peter Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 16 lines which said:
part of that traffic will be due to old hints files, but priming was
actually supposed to accelerate the migration.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:55:44AM +0100, Peter Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:35:29PM -0800, John Crain wrote:
>
> > Currently about 60% New IP to 40% old IP... and rising slowly
> >
> > So clearly a lot of folks still need to up date their hints files :(
>
> part of that traffic will
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:55:44AM +0100,
Peter Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 16 lines which said:
> part of that traffic will be due to old hints files, but priming was
> actually supposed to accelerate the migration.
Do all resolvers actually perform priming? BIND does but the
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:35:29PM -0800, John Crain wrote:
> Currently about 60% New IP to 40% old IP... and rising slowly
>
> So clearly a lot of folks still need to up date their hints files :(
part of that traffic will be due to old hints files, but priming was
actually supposed to accelerat
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >=20
> > but its not example.orgs call if ns.isi.edu changed its ip
> > address to 127.0.3.12... is it? that would be the call of the
> > admin for ns.isi.edu.=20
> >=20
> > and if there were no contact information on that nameserver in
> > the form of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> but its not example.orgs call if ns.isi.edu changed its ip
> address to 127.0.3.12... is it? that would be the call of the
> admin for ns.isi.edu.
>
> and if there were no contact information on that nameserver in
> the form of a HOST record
24 matches
Mail list logo
