On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 15:16, Chris Green wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 01:58:54PM +0100, Jesus M Diaz wrote:
> > I wasn't considering erasing/deleting the dnsmasq.leases file, I was
> > rather thinking of copying it to a non-running backup dnsmasq so
> >
On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 13:41, Chris Green wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:08:20PM +0100, Ed W wrote:
> > On 03/09/2021 11:31, Chris Green wrote:
> > > Two questions really:-
> > >
> > > Is the file /var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases the only place where
> > > dnsmasq keeps DHCP/IP/Name info
Probably a typo:
+.TH DNSMASQ 8 2020-08-16
or
+.TH DNSMASQ 8 202*1*-08-16
??
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 21:58, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss <
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
> There should already be an end-address or mode when adding a netmask.
>
> Also the date bumped.
>
On Sat, 17 Jul 2021 at 13:54, john doe wrote:
> On 7/17/2021 1:52 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> >
> >> On 17 Jul 2021, at 01:32, f...@gmx.de wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 16.07.2021 um 13:42 schrieb Geert Stappers:
> >>> ...
> >> All your messages are not helpfull and off topic.
> >>
> >>
probably to avoid
> using
> MAC addresses as machine identifiers at all. Can you set DHCP client IDs?
> Or
> use hostnames for the host machines' regular OSes as well?
>
> Alternatively, can you set up the live USBs to use custom MAC addresses,
> so the assumption does
set a precedence among
the potentially matching dhcp-hosts entries?
I don't really understand why the philosophical discussion on what a
computer is or is not.
Thanks anyway everybody for the comments.
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 14:54, Alex Morris
wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, at 13:42,
there might be where more than one dhcp-host
entry match the DHCP request.
Thanks
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 13:23, wrote:
> On 6/21/21 3:05 AM, Jesus M Diaz wrote:
> > - *My point of view: Each computer has a (dnsmasq) DNS entry, the
> entry gets
> > in DNS by DHCP of dnsmasq*.
So, regardless of your opinion about the scenario being logical, making
sense of being valid/invalid, the question stands: is there any way to
define precedences for potentially multiple matches?
Thanks.
Jesus M Diaz
On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 at 22:50, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss <
dnsmasq-discu
Hello,
Let me explain the scenario:
- I have a number of computers acquiring IP-address by DHCP and I have
dnsmasq configured with static leases for specific mac-addresses.
- I also have a couple of virtual computers for very specific purposes that
I run from a live Linux distro from a USB drive.
18 May 2021 at 21:58, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss <
dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:21:57PM +0100, Jesus M Diaz wrote:
> > Simon Kelly wrote:
> > > To answer the question, the host doesn't get the same address because
&
>
> To answer the question, the host doesn't get the same address because
> "multiple MAC addresses on the same line" is NOT the same as a MAC
> address with wildcards in it. If you had
>
> dhcp-host=96:8d:d4:d0:4d:e3,a4:50:46:d0:4d:e3,192.168.0.217
>
> then it would work, but
>
> dhcp-host=*:*:*:d
;s
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 17:57, wrote:
> On 5/17/21 5:30 AM, Jesus M Diaz wrote:
> > dhcp-host=*:*:*:d0:4d:e3,set:mobile,192.168.0.217,xiaomi-a2
>
> i have to wonder if using wildcards counts as "multiple mac addresses"...
>
> what happens if you explicitly se
Hello,
I am having an issue with this (see *[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq not
overriding leases for static assignments* thread), but in summary, the
problem is that this is not working for me: I have one dhcp-host
configuration line with multiple mac-addr for one ip-addr, but dnsmasq
don't assign the
om the pool) *With multiple MAC addresses on a
single line, when the second MAC address turns up, the IP address will
be unceremoniously ripped away from the first MAC address, and given to
the second one.*
But that is not being my case.
Thanks
Jesus M Diaz
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 07:28, Gee
> at identification happen???
> > >
> > >
> > will answer #5 and #6 together: in the config file line for this device
> >
> > dhcp-host=set:mobile,*:*:*:63:ea:55,samsungA30s
> >
> > I am setting a name (samsungA30s), a tag (mobile) and a mac-addr pattern
> > that both the initial lease and the new
Inline
>
> > That's an easy one,
>
> Okay. Here other easy one: Reply below previous text.
>
>
Nice to see easy comments.
> > I have the 'old' lease, the dnsmasq config and logs,
> > and tcpdump sniffing (see below). But the short story is:
> >
> >1. device asked some time ago for an ip-ad
That's an easy one, I have the 'old' lease, the dnsmasq config and logs,
and tcpdump sniffing (see below). But the short story is:
1. device asked some time ago for an ip-addr, and as it is configured to
get a static one, it got it (logged in the 'old' lease)
2. device disconnect from the
topic was actually
another: if dnsmasq is supposed to be able to abandon a lease when a known
and legit mac-address is requesting that same ip-address, and the static
lease is configured, why is it not doing it?
Thanks!
Jesus M
On Sat, 15 May 2021 at 12:38, Jesus M Diaz
wrote:
> Hello,
&g
Hello,
I am trying to set different ranges in my dnsmasq configuration, to be used
based on tags. I have a series of dhcp-host entries, matching by
mac-address, and setting host-name and tag in most cases, and static lease
in others:
dhcp-host=set:iot,a1:b1:c1:d1:e1:f1,hostname1
> ...
> dhcp-host
Hello,
I have a 'TP-Link One-Mesh' system at home formed by the main router and
three satellite access-points. It works really well making a good coverage
over the house with smooth change from one AP to the other, but it has a
caveat: for DHCP requests, the AP change the client mac-address with a
20 matches
Mail list logo
