Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Removing a feature does anyone rely on this?

2012-07-02 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Simon, Du meintest am 02.07.12: >>> dhcp-range may have an interface name supplied as >>> "interface:> name>> ". >> I'd like to use this feature in many schools: >> >> eth0 and eth1 for the school clients in the LAN, eth2 for the >> private clients (especially in the WLAN). And eth3 for D

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Removing a feature does anyone rely on this?

2012-07-02 Thread Vincent Cadet
> De: Helmut Hullen > > Although you don't like udev, I think it's an important > > part of your final solution. > > Sorry - I disagree. "udev" moves the problems, it doesn't > solve them. Okay, let's rephrase it and be accurate: udev does *not* solve your problem. Instead udev provides more ap

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Removing a feature does anyone rely on this?

2012-07-02 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Ed, Du meintest am 02.07.12: [dhcp-range=ethx,...] >>> What about [re]naming those interface names using udev, i.e. >>> xx-persistent-net.rules file in /etc/udev/rules.d/ ? >> That moves the problem from one place to another. I don't like >> "udev", I don't use "udev". Especially with mo

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Removing a feature does anyone rely on this?

2012-07-02 Thread Simon Kelley
On 02/07/12 04:42, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Simon, > > Du meintest am 01.07.12: > >> A quote from the man page: > >> dhcp-range may have an interface name supplied as >> "interface: name>> ". The semantics if this are as follows: For DHCP, if any other >> dhcp-range exists _without_ an int

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Removing a feature does anyone rely on this?

2012-07-02 Thread Ed W
On 02/07/2012 08:30, Helmut Hullen wrote: Hallo, Vincent, Du meintest am 02.07.12: But it seems to be a bit more difficult to change automatically something like dhcp-range=eth0,192.168.0.10,static dhcp-range=eth1,192.168.1,10,static dhcp-range=eth2,192.168.17.10-192.168,28.250

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Removing a feature does anyone rely on this?

2012-07-02 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Vincent, Du meintest am 02.07.12: >> But it seems to be a bit more difficult to change  >> automatically something like >> >>     dhcp-range=eth0,192.168.0.10,static >>     dhcp-range=eth1,192.168.1,10,static >>     dhcp-range=eth2,192.168.17.10-192.168,28.250 >> >> to >> >>     dhcp-range

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Removing a feature does anyone rely on this?

2012-07-02 Thread Vincent Cadet
Hello Helmut. > De: Helmut Hullen > Date: Lundi 2 juillet 2012, 5h42 > But it seems to be a bit more difficult to change  > automatically something like > >     dhcp-range=eth0,192.168.0.10,static >     dhcp-range=eth1,192.168.1,10,static >     dhcp-range=eth2,192.168.17.10-192.168,28.250 > >