On Jun 30, 2015 8:16 PM, "Jim Reid" wrote:
>
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:53, Peter Koch wrote:
>
> > This is probably an exception for the lack of a drop catching risk,
> > but keeping the domain to maintain a stake in the INT domain
> > might be OK.
>
> That is a remarkably bad idea. The .int domain
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:46:18AM +, Jim Reid wrote:
> I’m surprised this hasn’t been mentioned on these lists yet.
I hope most people track security bulletins through other distribution
channels than dns-wg@ripe.net. Most DNS vendors have dedicated
'announce' mailing lists for this type of i
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:48:39PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
> > On 24 Apr 2018, at 15:33, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> >
> > Now that the name ns-v6.ripe.net is no longer in use by anyone, we
> > are going to delete it from the ripe.net zone.
>
> Anand, could you clarify what you mean by “no longer in
Dear all,
Is a complete overview of the current policy / testing process
available?
To further this discussion - I think it would be good to have a full
understanding of what the current state of affairs is in this context.
Kind regards,
Job
