On Jun 30, 2015 8:16 PM, "Jim Reid" <j...@rfc1035.com> wrote: > > On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:53, Peter Koch <p...@denic.de> wrote: > > > This is probably an exception for the lack of a drop catching risk, > > but keeping the domain to maintain a stake in the INT domain > > might be OK. > > That is a remarkably bad idea. The .int domain's supposed to be for international treaty organisations. The NCC is not one. There is no reason why it should "maintain a stake in the INT domain". It simply shouldn't have a stake in this at all. If anything the NCC should be running away from .int as fast as is humanly possible.
+1, if we dont need it, get rid of it!
