Totally agree. The ripe.int domain comes from the time of ip6.int (another bad
idea) and the perceived need of alternatives to arpa (for the wrong reasons).
The sooner this gets dropped the better.
Joao
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 20:16, Jim Reid wrote:
>
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:53, Peter Koch wrot
> On 21 Apr 2016, at 15:26, Shane Kerr wrote:
>
>
>
> "𓎟𓀀
try registering the puny code version?
xn--5o7dx5d.com
Joao
I think this fits the RIPE NCC very well given their role as “more than just an
RIR”, their past and ongoing research work as well as their expertise in
running of the Internet’s DNS root servers and their ability to both inform
future experiments and translate outcomes into root server operatio
Actually Jim, first comes the poll of the community to see if this fits, later
comes what you suggest, if the community decides to ask the RIPE NCC to look
into it, or have we become the Ministry of IP?
Joao
> On 25 May 2016, at 09:55, Jim Reid wrote:
>
>
>> On 24 May 2016, at 13:41, Shane K
I share what John said
Joao
> On 01 Sep 2016, at 11:58, John Bond wrote:
>
> On 01/09/2016 08:20, Shane Kerr wrote:
>> Hello DNS working group,
>>
>> I nominate myself as co-chair of the DNS working group.
> I think you would make a good co chair and would like to express my
> support for thi
Hi Randy
I agree with you and that’s why i pushed for the dns wg to have a blind period
of candidate collection during which no one sees who else might be
volunteering. What you see now is the publication of the candidate list after
that period elapsed. Turns out no one else volunteered
On top
Dear all,
The deadline for DNS WG co-chair candidate volunteering is now over.
I am happy to announce that we have two great candidates.
The period to express support for your preferred candidate(s) starts now and
runs until November 24th 2021.
Shane Kerr and myself, as continuing wg co-chairs
