Actually Jim, first comes the poll of the community to see if this fits, later comes what you suggest, if the community decides to ask the RIPE NCC to look into it, or have we become the Ministry of IP?
Joao > On 25 May 2016, at 09:55, Jim Reid <j...@rfc1035.com> wrote: > > >> On 24 May 2016, at 13:41, Shane Kerr <sh...@time-travellers.org> wrote: >> >> Please let us know what you think about this idea. > > <No hats> > Before we take this idea forward, could someone please suggest metrics and > milestones that could be used to assess the success or failure of this > activity? For bonus points, it would be good to know what sort of resource > commitments will be needed and the level of reporting that can be expected > from the NCC being involved in Yeti DNS. > > We should be careful to not have the NCC get into open-ended, vague > commitments where there's uncertainty about the on-going value to the > community. Experiments are all very well but both the WG and the NCC's DNS > team need to know how/when to decide to kill the experiment or turn it into a > formally supported resource or do something else with it. > >
