> On 26 May 2016, at 14:44, Romeo Zwart wrote:
>
> Following the guidelines of the working group, we (the NCC) have
> recently started reviewing eligibility of ccTLDs based on the existing
> document text. If the document moves back to a 'limbo-state' based on
> renewed discussion in the WG that
> On 26 May 2016, at 13:33, Shane Kerr wrote:
>
> 1. Gaurab and I think that there should be an exemption for ccTLD who
> do not currently have IPv6 service. (There are a few tens of ccTLD
> who do not yet have IPV6, and I would like the RIPE NCC to be
> able to help them get IPv6 service
Hi Shane,
On 16/05/26 14:33 , Shane Kerr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anand just mentioned at his presentation at RIPE 72 that the RIPE NCC
> is now implementing RIPE 663:
>
> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-663
>
> There were a couple of suggestions for tweaks to that:
>
> 1. Gaurab and I
Hello,
Anand just mentioned at his presentation at RIPE 72 that the RIPE NCC
is now implementing RIPE 663:
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-663
There were a couple of suggestions for tweaks to that:
1. Gaurab and I think that there should be an exemption for ccTLD who
do not curre
