On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 6:47 PM, SM wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> At 15:15 30-03-2014, Stephan Lagerholm wrote:
>
>> c.root-servers.net is not reachable over v6 for everybody. There appears
>> to be some peering disputes between operators over v6 still. Additionally,
>> Leen Besselink told me on anoth
In message , "S
tephan Lagerholm" writes:
> Hi DNS-ops,
>
> c.root-servers.net is not reachable over v6 for everybody. There appears
> to be some peering disputes between operators over v6 still.
Peering disputes happen. Such is life. Cogent and HE is a long
running dispute. Using a second tra
Hi Stephan,
At 15:15 30-03-2014, Stephan Lagerholm wrote:
c.root-servers.net is not reachable over v6 for everybody. There
appears to be some peering disputes between operators over v6 still.
Additionally, Leen Besselink told me on another mailing list
(unbound) that it is advertized as a /48 t
Hi DNS-ops,
c.root-servers.net is not reachable over v6 for everybody. There appears to be
some peering disputes between operators over v6 still. Additionally, Leen
Besselink told me on another mailing list (unbound) that it is advertized as a
/48 that might get filtered.
What are the reachabi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
See also:
http://www.renesys.com/2014/03/turkish-internet-censorship/
- - ferg
On 3/30/2014 1:13 PM, Alexander Neilson wrote:
> Have you done a lookup on public IP Address of those two nodes?
>
> Or any analysis of this variance? Using over the
Have you done a lookup on public IP Address of those two nodes?
Or any analysis of this variance? Using over the border internet? tunnelling?
Regards
Alexander
Alexander Neilson
Neilson Productions Limited
alexan...@neilson.net.nz
021 329 681
022 456 2326
On 31/03/2014, at 3:57 am, Stephane Bo
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:23:21PM +0800, ?? wrote:
> dig @n.de.net 1s.de mx +dnssec
> and find that the mx record of 1s.de is from the n.de.net(194.146.107.6),
> but it is not enough to make sure that from the .de zone. Maybe it the
> nameservers for the .de zone also serve for the 1s.de.
in
> http://www.bortzmeyer.org/dns-routing-hijack-turkey.html
Here is the result of a lookup of whoami.akamai.net from the ten
turkish RIPE Atlas probes:
[74.125.18.80] : 2 occurrences
[195.175.255.66] : 8 occurrences
74.125.18.80 is Google, 195.175.255.66 Turkish Telecom. So, no, Google
Public DNS
> http://www.bortzmeyer.org/dns-routing-hijack-turkey.html
The answer to your question is in the article:
> if you try a little-known open DNS resolver, there is no problem,
> even from Turkey, you get correct results (measurement #1605104).
___
dns-op
On 28/03/14 19:57, "Weinberg, Matt" wrote:
>Joe is right ‹ http://www.internic.net/domain/named.root is maintained by
>ICANN. I believe that ICANN pulls updates from rs.internic.net on a
>scheduled basis. We¹re following up with ICANN to confirm.
This should be updated now
_
10 matches
Mail list logo