In message <dd056a31a84cfc4ab501bd56d1e14bbb0148c...@exchange.secure64.com>, "S tephan Lagerholm" writes: > Hi DNS-ops, > > c.root-servers.net is not reachable over v6 for everybody. There appears > to be some peering disputes between operators over v6 still.
Peering disputes happen. Such is life. Cogent and HE is a long running dispute. Using a second transit provider would almost certainly address this issue. > Additionally, Leen Besselink told me on another mailing list (unbound) > that it is advertized as a /48 that might get filtered. /48 is standard for provider independent assignments. A is advertised with 2001:503:ba3e::/48 C is advertised with 2001:500:2::/48 D is advertised with 2001:500:2d::/48 F is advertises with 2001:500:2f::/48 H is advertised with 2001:500:1::/48 > What are the reachability requirements before something gets added to the > root zone? > > I'm not sure what is right or wrong here and the train already left the > station, but I wanted to start a discussion if it was wise to add this > into the root-zone at this point? > > Thanks, Stephan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dns-operations-boun...@lists.dns-oarc.net [mailto:dns-operations- > > boun...@lists.dns-oarc.net] On Behalf Of Weinberg, Matt > > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 1:57 PM > > To: dns-operati...@dns-oarc.net > > Subject: Re: [dns-operations] AAAA record for c.root-servers.net > > > > We've corrected the update issue and subsequently fixed the "last > > update" field. The latest files are available on the rs.internic.net > > servers (for example, ftp://rs.internic.net/domain/named.root). > > > > Joe is right < http://www.internic.net/domain/named.root is maintained > > by ICANN. I believe that ICANN pulls updates from rs.internic.net on a > > scheduled basis. We're following up with ICANN to confirm. > > > > Thanks, > > Matt > > > > > > > > On 3/28/14, 2:28 PM, "Joe Abley" <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > >On 28 Mar 2014, at 13:16, Anthony Kirby <anthony.ki...@nominet.org.uk> > > >wrote: > > > > > >> the copy available at ftp://rs.internic.net/domain/ does contain the > > >>AAAA, although that at ftp.internic.net does not; that's the only > > >>diff, & both say "last update Jan 3 2013". > > > > > >I think rs is run by Verisign and ftp is run by ICANN, and ftp mirrors > > >from rs. Kim Davies is on this list and will surely react in due > > >course, but I'm guessing he's in transit between Singapore and LA > > right > > >now following the ICANN meeting this week. > > > > > >Might be just a matter of waiting for a nightly cron job. > > > > > >If I'm right about the data flow, then the "Jan 3 2013" thing is > > >presumably something for Verisign to clean up (if they haven't > > already). > > > > > > > > >Joe > > >_______________________________________________ > > >dns-operations mailing list > > >dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net > > >https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > > >dns-jobs mailing list > > >https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dns-operations mailing list > > dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net > > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > > dns-jobs mailing list > > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs > > > > ----- > > No virus found in this message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 2014.0.4354 / Virus Database: 3722/7259 - Release Date: > > 03/27/14 > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > dns-jobs mailing list > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
