Hey Lennart if you dislike Devuan that much feel free to go back to
freedesktop.org or whatever?
On February 2, 2015 7:47:28 PM EET, "T.J. Duchene"
wrote:
>Funny thing. I hear a lot of complaining about systemd, and yes, i
>think
>some of it is justified, but consider this...Rather than join
Well Poettering is actually getting paid for doing all this, the same goes for
a lot of other contributors, basically they have nothing better to do and this
is a nice excuse to get money.
On February 2, 2015 8:51:18 PM EET, digitek wrote:
>FTFA It sounds like systemd is evolving into a piece o
If systemd is the Borg I propose the first release of Devuan be named S8472.
And that we temporarily change the project motto to 'The weak shall perish'.
Trek fans will know what I am talking about.;)
On February 2, 2015 8:15:10 PM EET, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
>Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
>>
GNOME and KDE are bloated, and DEs should not put requirements on anything,
they are nothing more than GUI alternatives to the shell.
On February 3, 2015 12:54:12 AM EET, t.j.duch...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Monday, February 02, 2015 07:57:23 PM Vlad wrote:
>> Hey Lennart if you dislike De
I think he might be a concern troll, best ignore him.
On Feb 3, 2015 1:32 AM, "Steve Litt" wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:54:12 -0600
> t.j.duch...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Monday, February 02, 2015 07:57:23 PM Vlad wrote:
> > > Hey Lennart if you dislike Dev
What exactly does IPC have to do with patching?
On Feb 15, 2015 5:22 PM, "Jaromil" wrote:
>
> hi
>
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2015, jo...@trash-mail.com wrote:
>
> >As you may have read, Linus Torvalds considers to call the next
> >Linux release 4.0 instead of 3.20. Many people have been wondering
This would IMO be a good thing, as it will limit the interaction between
Poettering OS and normal Linux, and they would have to fix the bugs they
create themselves, rather than bitch and moan about the kernel not playing
well with their software, it would also mean that they can implement stuff
lik
exactly.
On Mar 30, 2015 4:15 PM, "Chris Kalin" wrote:
> I hope it's absolutely true. Do all the ripping out and rebuilding in
> their own tree, and if Linus et al don't want to merge the changes back
> into mainline, distro users can use a sane kernel. Keep your peanut butter
> out of my choco
I use F-Droid with cyanogen and I am quite happy, the number and quality of
apps is steadily increasing too.
On Mar 30, 2015 2:49 PM, "John Morris" wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 12:33 +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
> > BTW, I, like many others, find convenient to use e.g. Skype, and I
> > would
Big deal, I will just run Windows in a VM then, although imo by the time they
'obsolete' 7 MS will probably be irrelevant.
Red Hat's way of doing things annoys me more and more, but they are far from
the only corporate fish in the Linux ocean, HP, IBM, Oracle, VMWare and Google
and quite a few
Do you have actual package management tools like yum or apt-get?
You could install syslog and set systemd's journald binary garbage
producing crap to forward to it.
On May 19, 2015 5:11 PM, "shraptor" wrote:
> Bought a jolla phone to replace my iphone.
>
> Got trouble with mobile internet.
>
> I
I think that the pretty useless feature which helped systemd into Debian in the
first place was discussed some time ago.
As you might know multi seat is supposed to make possible for multiple users
to utilize a single desktop or laptop system in full blown GUI mode via special
USB hubs, the ma
Yeah, but that is why we have VNC for.
As I said, multiseat is pretty much useless.
Hell, the proprietary software can be installed on a server and run from
anywhere.
On Jul 23, 2015 6:32 AM, "Isaac Dunham" wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:49:32AM +0300, Vlad wrote:
> &g
Alsa uses dbus, since when?
On Jul 23, 2015 7:12 PM, "Steve Litt" wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:39:05 +0200
> Michael Bütow wrote:
>
>
> > I am sure if someone wants to expend the energy to get rid of D-Bus
> > related software in Devuan, they can set up their own spin of it.
>
> For those of
Isn't the Debian swirl logo GPL as well, I do not think t will be a problem
for Devuan to use it?
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 9:17 PM, hal wrote:
> John Morris wrote on 12/18/14 15:46:
> > I like it, but nothing with the Debian registered trademark swirl is
> > likely to be usable for legal reasons.
15 matches
Mail list logo
