Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Giovanni Rapagnani
On 06/11/16 17:40, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 17:14:39 +0100, Giovanni wrote in message <5be642ae-c983-3ee3-db68-be1e7657a...@ideanet.be>: On 06/11/16 15:20, KatolaZ wrote: On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 02:59:13PM +0100, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote: Based on the MLs description on [2], dev

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Rowland Penny
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:21:29 +0100 Giovanni Rapagnani wrote: > On 06/11/16 17:40, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 17:14:39 +0100, Giovanni wrote in message > > <5be642ae-c983-3ee3-db68-be1e7657a...@ideanet.be>: > > > >> On 06/11/16 15:20, KatolaZ wrote: > >>> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 02:

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Bozonius
On 06/11/16 17:40, Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..that's what we call Stupid Luck. The next step is "when" 170 million voters write in Bernie Sanders for POTUŜ and Jill Stein for VP on Tuesday... I may or may not agree with the former statement, but I think the latter falls more in the category of "mir

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Edward Bartolo
This is one important reason why Devuan should have invested effort into setting up a forum that uses an interface many would use readily. I suggested phpBB like forums.debian.net. The reason given for not choosing phpBB, as I understood it, was phpBB is too demanding on servers. I remember when f

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Jaromil
dear Giovanni, On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote: > - on DNG ML: 145 different email addresses from 22 different time zones have > posted 3800 emails with an average of 633 emails/month [...] > - on devuan-discuss: 21 different email addresses from 11 different time > zones have pos

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Rowland Penny
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:38:08 +0100 Edward Bartolo wrote: > This is one important reason why Devuan should have invested effort > into setting up a forum that uses an interface many would use readily. > I suggested phpBB like forums.debian.net. The reason given for not > choosing phpBB, as I unders

Re: [DNG] Why does systemd do such stupid things

2016-11-07 Thread Simon Hobson
Nate Bargmann wrote: > After I thought about it some, there is a certain logic to udev's > behavior but it would seem to make more sense if the network adapter is > on a hot-pluggable interface (PCMCIA, USB, etc.), or is in addition to > the adapter already assigned to eth0 on a PCI bus. The beh

Re: [DNG] lxde menu missing shutdown, etc.

2016-11-07 Thread hal
Florian Zieboll wrote on 11/06/2016 04:38 AM: > Do you have a default installation or some heavily customized one? I > remember having had solved such an issue by installing policykit (or > consolekit?). > Not sure what changes I've made would have affected this. Some global hotkeys, wallpaper,

Re: [DNG] archive of this mailing list?

2016-11-07 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016 12:28:03 -0600 goli...@dyne.org wrote: > You might also check out #devuan on freenode. Also, don't forget #debianfork, which is the "offtopic" channel where we rant about systemd, and talk about our hobbies. SteveT Steve Litt November 2016 featured book: Quit Joblessness:

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Steve Litt
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:50:43 +0100 Jaromil wrote: > dear Giovanni, > > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote: > > - on DNG ML: 145 different email addresses from 22 different time > > zones have posted 3800 emails with an average of 633 emails/month > > [...] > > > - on devuan-discuss

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 161107-10:38+0100, Edward Bartolo wrote: > This is one important reason why Devuan should have invested effort > into setting up a forum that uses an interface many would use readily. > I suggested phpBB like forums.debian.net. The reason given for not > choosing phpBB, as I understood it, was p

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Alessandro Selli
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 at 09:21:29 +0100 Giovanni Rapagnani wrote: [...] > The information > given on the community page of the website should reflect that fact, and > not erroneously tell people to subscribe to a ML where there is almost > no activity. Sounds to me the most rational thing to

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Dan Purgert
On 11/07/2016 11:29 AM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > On 161107-10:38+0100, Edward Bartolo wrote: >> This is one important reason why Devuan should have invested effort >> into setting up a forum that uses an interface many would use readily. >> I suggested phpBB like forums.debian.net. The reason give

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:33:26PM -0500, Dan Purgert wrote: > > Forums are fine and all, but since this list and IRC are decently > active, it may be a poor move to try pushing forums as well (given that > the "discuss" forum is pretty much dead in the water). > > Now, if there was a newsgroup .

Re: [DNG] lxde menu missing shutdown, etc.

2016-11-07 Thread hal
aitor_czr wrote on 11/06/2016 03:44 AM: > > Are you using any session-manager like slim, lightdm... or are you using > "startx"? > I am starting from Slim. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [DNG] lxde menu missing shutdown, etc.

2016-11-07 Thread Paweł Cholewinski
Hi, try this https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20160825.182542.61d57934.en.html On 05.11.2016 11:23, hal wrote: Hi All, I noticed my lxde logout menu[1] is missing some items. All I have are "Lock screen" "Logout" and "Cancel". Not sure if this is of my own doing, or not. I recall a thread

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Giovanni Rapagnani
Dear Jaromil, On 07/11/16 10:50, Jaromil wrote: you are right, devuan-discuss never took off. it also did not receive much love from any admin and I believe is stuck with some moderation bit noone has attended. It is a failed plan which I suggest we interpret as part of the "Beta" as much as oth

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

2016-11-07 Thread Thomas Besser
Am 07.11.2016 um 16:01 schrieb Hendrik Boom: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:33:26PM -0500, Dan Purgert wrote: >> >> Forums are fine and all, but since this list and IRC are decently >> active, it may be a poor move to try pushing forums as well (given that >> the "discuss" forum is pretty much dead i