Dear Jaromil, On 07/11/16 10:50, Jaromil wrote:
you are right, devuan-discuss never took off. it also did not receive much love from any admin and I believe is stuck with some moderation bit noone has attended. It is a failed plan which I suggest we interpret as part of the "Beta" as much as other technical issues are.
It is a good think to remind that Beta phase also means the project is settling its infrastructure, its communication channels, ... It is not always obvious for everyone, me first.
I will update the webpage accordingly, indicating the talk.devuan.org webforum and the DNG mailinglist as the main places for discussion, but also the git.devuan.org issues as the place where to report bugs.
Once updated, it would probably be a good thing to inform the people on devuan-discuss they'd better move to the DNG ml.
as we are settling a meaningful communication architecture for all, analysis and recommendations like yours are very welcome. We will also think of a standard practice for requesting to open a new mailinglist, something like a request backed by 10 or more active members and 2 volunteering for facilitation. I guess the devuan-discuss ml lacked this sort of support, was thought and created top-down and therefore it failed to take-off properly.
Thank you for sharing the plan and ideas on the futur communication channels.
I haven't been active on the ML however I am subscribed to it since the beginning and I have been following all of you since then.
Thanks to all the people who have invested their effort in Devuan so far. Best regards, Giovanni _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
