On 14/03/16 19:47, Thomas Besser wrote:
> Am 14.03.2016 um 04:27 schrieb David Kuehling:
>> The german Devuan page https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devuan seems to be
>> facing some sort of deletion war. Somtimes it exists, sometimes it does
>> not. I'm not a wikipedian, and don't know were to find
Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
On 14/03/16 11:30, aitor_czr wrote:
>
>On 03/13/2016 10:41 PM, Didier Kryn wrote:
>> I agree. And I think most people on this list would vote like me
>>for a sequential version number rather than a date. However maybe Jude
>>had the intent to
Hi All,
just to let you know that devuan runs also on the new raspberry pi 3
(I had no doubt about it, since it is very similar to the rpi2). A
simple dist-upgrade from Raspian to Devuan Jessie works smoothly, and
all the systemd crap can be safely removed afterwards.
Ironically, my stopwatch s
have you consider x2go? For me it is perfect.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Hi Daniel, Didier
Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
>I'd suggest using a version like:
>0.1.jude+
>That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his
>version scheme easily assuming that he starts with > 0.1.
Something like this?
0.1.20160314+1deb1
I was purp
On 05/03/16 13:31, aitor_czr wrote:
Something like this?
0.1.20160314+1deb1
Sorry:
0.1.jude20160314+1deb1
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On 05/03/16 14:31, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi Daniel, Didier
>
>> Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
>>> > I'd suggest using a version like:
>>> > 0.1.jude+>> >
>>> > That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his
>>> > version scheme easily assuming that he starts wi
On 15/03/16 02:41, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> On 05/03/16 13:31, aitor_czr wrote:
>>
>> Something like this?
>>
>> 0.1.20160314+1deb1
>
> Sorry:
>
> 0.1.jude20160314+1deb1
0.1.jude20160314-1 is the correct way (according to debian policy).
--
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Lt
On 15/03/16 01:51, Mat wrote:
> On 05/03/16 14:31, aitor_czr wrote:
>> Hi Daniel, Didier
>>
>>> Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
> I'd suggest using a version like:
> 0.1.jude+
> That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his
> version scheme
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:31:10PM +, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi Daniel, Didier
>
> >Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
> >>>I'd suggest using a version like:
> >>>0.1.jude+ >>>
> >>>That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his
> >>>version scheme easily assumin
Fedora is switching back to X11 in 24:
https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2016/03/04/why-wayland-anyway/
Mitt
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:31:10PM +, aitor_czr wrote:
>> Hi Daniel, Didier
>>
>> >Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
>> >>>I'd suggest using a version like:
>> >>>0.1.jude+> >>>
>> >>>That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his
>>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:38:15PM +0100, m_maass wrote:
> have you consider x2go? For me it is perfect.
The Debian instructions on
http://wiki.x2go.org/doku.php/doc:installation:x2goserver say to
install x2goserver and x2goserver-xsession.
But Devuan jessie provides
x2goclient, x2goplugin, x
mitt_gr...@riseup.net writes:
> Fedora is switching back to X11 in 24:
> https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2016/03/04/why-wayland-anyway/
A more accurate summary would be "Fedora is not yet switching to wayland
as default for 24".
Entertaining read:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/Wayland/Prima
2016-03-14 21:37 GMT+01:00, Rainer Weikusat :
> But GNOME developers presumably don't belong to a social class of people
> buying cheap stuff in brick & mortar high street shops ...
And that makes the issue quite strange: the evoluent vertical mouse
has four buttons
and a scrollwheel. All pro-gami
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:02:52AM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> just to let you know that devuan runs also on the new raspberry pi 3
> (I had no doubt about it, since it is very similar to the rpi2).
Devuan has only armhf so far, you want arm64 for rpi3.
> Ironically, my stopwatch says that the sysvin
On 15/03/16 09:58, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:02:52AM +, KatolaZ wrote:
>> just to let you know that devuan runs also on the new raspberry pi 3
>> (I had no doubt about it, since it is very similar to the rpi2).
>
> Devuan has only armhf so far, you want arm64 for rpi3.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:58:56PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:02:52AM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> > just to let you know that devuan runs also on the new raspberry pi 3
> > (I had no doubt about it, since it is very similar to the rpi2).
>
> Devuan has only armhf so far,
On 03/14/2016 09:04 PM, Daniel Reurich wrote:
On 15/03/16 02:41, aitor_czr wrote:
>
>On 05/03/16 13:31, aitor_czr wrote:
>>
>>Something like this?
>>
>>0.1.20160314+1deb1
>
>Sorry:
>
>0.1.jude20160314+1deb1
0.1.jude20160314-1 is the correct way (according to debian policy).
I wanted to sa
On 15/03/16 11:33, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2016 09:04 PM, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>> On 15/03/16 02:41, aitor_czr wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On 05/03/16 13:31, aitor_czr wrote:
>>
>> Something like this?
>>
>> 0.1.20160314+1deb1
>>> >
>>> > Sorry:
>>> >
>>> > 0.1.jude20160314+1
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:42:22PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> Well, you can also use armhf (32bits), and live happy :)
That would be as bad as using i386 instead of amd64 or x32 (the equivalent
of x32 is arm32 which is not a Debian architecture yet -- as the difference
between armhf and arm32 is far
On 03/14/2016 11:55 PM, Daniel Reurich wrote:
That's only for packages that have been upgraded in the stable release
update.
Actually I'd suggest 0.1.20160314-1 is actually best
Ok, thanks.
Aitor.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://
22 matches
Mail list logo
