On 15/03/16 11:33, aitor_czr wrote:
> 
> On 03/14/2016 09:04 PM, Daniel Reurich <dan...@centurion.net.nz> wrote:
>> On 15/03/16 02:41, aitor_czr wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > On 05/03/16 13:31, aitor_czr wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Something like this?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 0.1.20160314+1deb1
>>> > 
>>> > Sorry:
>>> > 
>>> > 0.1.jude20160314+1deb1
>> 0.1.jude20160314-1 is the correct way (according to debian policy).
> 
> I wanted to say +deb1uX
> 
> Currently, debian stable is using +deb8uX
> 
> Isn't it?

That's only for packages that have been upgraded in the stable release
update.

Actually I'd suggest 0.1.20160314-1 is actually best




-- 
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd.
021 797 722

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to