Le 19/03/2015 21:15, Steve Litt a écrit :
If anyone want's Gnome for Devuan, let that be in a "contaminated"
repository (and yes, that's what I believe it should be called),
Hi steve.
As discussed in another thread, there are certainly other packages
affected by the big-brother syndro
On Fri, 3/20/15, Didier Kryn wrote:
Subject: Re: [Dng] Devuan commitments - will trade-off be applied?
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Friday, March 20, 2015, 10:48 AM
Le 19/03/2015 21:15, Steve Litt a écrit :
> If anyone want's Gnome for Devuan, let that be in a "contaminated"
> repository (a
On Fri 20 March 2015 08:56:47 Go Linux wrote:
> I support this idea. Put all the systemd stuff in a 'quarantine' repo with
> the appropriate 'use at your own risk' caveats.
I'd like to suggest a more generic approach, based on (quick shot suggestion
to get refined) listing the number of direct a
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:13:17 +0100
Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> On Fri 20 March 2015 08:56:47 Go Linux wrote:
> > I support this idea. Put all the systemd stuff in a 'quarantine'
> > repo with the appropriate 'use at your own risk' caveats.
>
> I'd like to suggest a more generic approach, based o
On 20/03/15 16:56, Go Linux wrote:
On Fri, 3/20/15, Didier Kryn wrote:
Le 19/03/2015 21:15, Steve Litt a écrit :
If anyone want's Gnome for Devuan, let that be in a "contaminated"
repository (and yes, that's what I believe it should be called),
Hi steve.
As discussed in anothe
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 01:44:55PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> Let me give an analogy that's absolutely offtopic here, I use it only
Not as off-topic as you might think.
> as an analogy. Three years ago, I made a policy that no KDE library or
> software would ever exist on any of Troubleshooter
Steve Litt wrote:
> What would especially float my boat, once there's a truly depoetterized
> Devuan, is to have the package manager warn me at 160 decibles if I
> decide to install something that pulls in any systemd code, because if
> there's a way to run without systemd code, that's how I want t
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:40:43 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > What would especially float my boat, once there's a truly
> > depoetterized Devuan, is to have the package manager warn me at 160
> > decibles if I decide to install something that pulls in any systemd
> > code, because i
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 20:07:05 +0100
Anto wrote:
>
> On 20/03/15 16:56, Go Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, 3/20/15, Didier Kryn wrote:
> >
> > Le 19/03/2015 21:15, Steve Litt a écrit :
> >> If anyone want's Gnome for Devuan, let that be in a "contaminated"
> >> repository (and yes, that's what I belie
On 20/03/15 21:08, Steve Litt wrote:
Anto,
You're absolutely right. So let me modify my idea...
If anybody *chooses* to integrate an app with any direct or indirect
systemd dependencies, that person must put their package in the
"contaminated" or "quarantine" repository, and that person is
res
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:01:28PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:40:43 -1000
> Joel Roth wrote:
>
> > Steve Litt wrote:
> > > What would especially float my boat, once there's a truly
> > > depoetterized Devuan, is to have the package manager warn me at 160
> > > decibles if I
On Fri 20 March 2015 16:08:24 Steve Litt wrote:
> If anybody *chooses* to integrate an app with any direct or indirect
> systemd dependencies, that person must put their package in the
> "contaminated" or "quarantine" repository,
It seems the discussion is a tad missing the point, since
a) devuan
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> My guess would be that all rogue stuff like
> systemd simply doesn't show up in devuan's packages.gz, and thus any package
> depending on it would run into unmet dependencies when trying to install it.
Makes sense.
__
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:09:20PM +0100, Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
>
> for details on how all this works on apt level with the devuan overlay over
> debian, you rather ask nextime. My guess would be that all rogue stuff like
> systemd simply doesn't show up in devuan's packages.gz, and thus any
On Fri 20 March 2015 18:08:51 Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:09:20PM +0100, Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> > for details on how all this works on apt level with the devuan overlay
> > over
> > debian, you rather ask nextime. My guess would be that all rogue stuff
> > like
> > systemd
-Original Message-
> On Fri 20 March 2015 08:56:47 Go Linux wrote:
> > I support this idea. Put all the systemd stuff in a 'quarantine'
> > repo with the appropriate 'use at your own risk' caveats.
>
From: Steve Litt [mailto:sl...@troubleshooters.com]
What would especially float my
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 21:43:46 +0100
Anto wrote:
>
> On 20/03/15 21:08, Steve Litt wrote:
> > Anto,
> >
> > You're absolutely right. So let me modify my idea...
> >
> > If anybody *chooses* to integrate an app with any direct or indirect
> > systemd dependencies, that person must put their package
On Fri 20 March 2015 22:09:20 Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> for details on how all this works on apt level with the devuan overlay over
> debian, you rather ask nextime.
Rather first look here:
https://git.devuan.org/devuan-infrastructure/amprolla/blob/master/README.md
signature.asc
Description: T
18 matches
Mail list logo
