Hi,
Once that I git pushed netman with Rainer's patch it is time to start
thinking about giving users choice to let netman autostart and try
autoconnecting to wifi.
I think, that can be done by providing a simple script or compiled
executable to configure netman so that it starts automatically wi
Edward Bartolo writes:
> On 16/12/2015, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> On 16/12/2015 20:03, Edward Bartolo wrote:
On 15/12/15 21:00, Rainer Weikusat
wrote:
> Some more remarks on the packaging efforts so far: The rules file in the
> git repository is
>>>
> override_dh_auto_clean:
>>
Edward Bartolo wrote:
>> No matter what you believe about this, overriding a command with itself
>> is a pointless exercise. dh_auto_clean will be invoked as part of the
>> 'dh clean' sequence, cf
>
> Please, refrain from using offensive and vulgar expressions. 'cf' is
> "complete fuck" which im
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:16:20AM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
[cut]
> > No matter what you believe about this, overriding a command with itself
> > is a pointless exercise. dh_auto_clean will be invoked as part of the
> > 'dh clean' sequence, cf
>
> Please, refrain from using offensive and vul
> On December 17, 2015 at 2:16 AM Edward Bartolo wrote:
>
> > No matter what you believe about this, overriding a command with itself
> > is a pointless exercise. dh_auto_clean will be invoked as part of the
> > 'dh clean' sequence, cf
>
> Please, refrain from using offensive and vulgar expressi
On 16/12/2015, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On 16/12/2015 20:03, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>>> On 15/12/15 21:00, Rainer Weikusat
>>> wrote:
Some more remarks on the packaging efforts so far: The rules file in the
git repository is
>>
override_dh_auto_clean:
dh_auto_clean
>>
>>
Rainer Weikusat writes:
[...]
>> Sorry, I am perplexed and cannot take decisions that may impact badly
>> already working code.
>
> I suggest that you at least test proposed changes before making wild
> claims about them.
Since this may be useful in such a situation and is apparently not
"commo
Edward Bartolo writes:
>> On 15/12/15 21:00, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>>> Some more remarks on the packaging efforts so far: The rules file in the
>>> git repository is
>
>>> override_dh_auto_clean:
>>> dh_auto_clean
>
> Hi,
>
> I am very hesitant about deleting this particular line as it
On 16/12/2015 20:03, Edward Bartolo wrote:
On 15/12/15 21:00, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
Some more remarks on the packaging efforts so far: The rules file in the
git repository is
override_dh_auto_clean:
dh_auto_clean
I am very hesitant about deleting this particular line as it has b
> On 15/12/15 21:00, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> Some more remarks on the packaging efforts so far: The rules file in the
>> git repository is
>> override_dh_auto_clean:
>> dh_auto_clean
Hi,
I am very hesitant about deleting this particular line as it has been
added to clean the sources
On 15/12/15 21:00, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
Some more remarks on the packaging efforts so far: The rules file in the
git repository is
--
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $@ --with quilt,python2
override_dh_auto_clean:
dh_auto_clean
override_dh_auto_configure:
#fpc
Hi Edward and Rainer,
On 15/12/15 21:00, Edward Bartolo wrote:
while true; do
>> read -p "Do you want netman to use a systray icon? (Y/n)" yn
>> case $yn in
>> [Nn]* ) line="exec=netman";
>> file="/etc/xdg/autostart/netman.desktop";
>> break;;
>> * ) line="
On 15/12/2015, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> So for the
>> moment we are stuck: on one hand there are users who want a network
>> manager to automatically start and automatically connect if a
>> connection is configured, while on the other hand, there are those
>> users who want netman to start only when
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:44:23PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Rainer,
>>
>> Thanks for your help. This means assuming a user is available at the
>> terminal during installation violates the Debian policy.
>
> But isn't there some mechanism for configuring pack
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:44:23PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Thanks for your help. This means assuming a user is available at the
> terminal during installation violates the Debian policy.
But isn't there some mechanism for configuring packaes at installation
time? I cer
Some more remarks on the packaging efforts so far: The rules file in the
git repository is
--
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $@ --with quilt,python2
override_dh_auto_clean:
dh_auto_clean
override_dh_auto_configure:
#fpc -MObjFPC -Scghi -Tlinux -vewn -Filib/x86_64-linu
On 15/12/2015, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> aitor_czr writes:
>> Hi Edward,
>>
>> I made some changes in netman-gui.postinst:
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>> if [ "$1" = "configure" ]; then
>> /sbin/ldconfig
>> fi
>
> The package doesn't "install shared libraries to default library
> directory", hence, there'
aitor_czr writes:
> On 14/12/15 17:10, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>> I am thinking about making autostarting and connecting automatically
>> >to wifi optional during the installation process of netman. This
>> >means, I need to write a post installation script or if its already
>> >exists, add a few l
On 14/12/2015, aitor_czr wrote:
> The line 11 was wrong:
>
>> #!/bin/sh
>> if [ "$1" = "configure" ]; then
>> /sbin/ldconfig
>> fi
>>
>> while true; do
>> read -p "Do you want netman to use a systray icon? (Y/n)" yn
>> case $yn in
>> [Nn]* ) line="exec=netman";
>> file="/etc/
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 05:43:51PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Steve Litt writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > GIT is everywhere, now. I need to stop being that guy who looks up a
> > few commands and dabbles with GIT, and start being a GIT expert.
>
> My personal theory on that is "university education
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 07:53:17AM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13 Dec 2015 Aitor wrote:
> Creating a 'netman.desktop' file in '/etc/xdg/autostart' directory,
> netman will start automatically.
>
> I am thinking about making autostarting and connecting automatically
> to wifi optiona
Hi Edward,
On 14/12/15 17:10, Edward Bartolo wrote:
I am thinking about making autostarting and connecting automatically
>to wifi optional during the installation process of netman. This
>means, I need to write a post installation script or if its already
>exists, add a few lines to it, so tha
On 14/12/15 17:10, Edward Bartolo wrote:
I am thinking about making autostarting and connecting automatically
>to wifi optional during the installation process of netman. This
>means, I need to write a post installation script or if its already
>exists, add a few lines to it, so that users can c
On Mon, 12/14/15, Timo Buhrmester wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] Debianising my uploaded version of netman.
To: "Edward Bartolo"
Cc: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Monday, December 14, 2015, 6:02 AM
>> As I use gmail's old webmail interface
> I'm sorry to hear it.
&g
Hi Edward,
On 14/12/15 13:00, Edward Bartolo wrote:
I am thinking about making autostarting and connecting automatically
to wifi optional during the installation process of netman. This
means, I need to write a post installation script or if its already
exists, add a few lines to it, so that us
Timo Buhrmester writes:
The convention is to prefix the quoted part with >. Sensible MUAs will
identify that as a quote and make it stand out appropriately.
It's about as easy to do with gmail as with mutt. Click the "..." near the
bottom of the compose area (or hit down-arrow and then enter)
> As I use gmail's old webmail interface
I'm sorry to hear it.
> I would appreciate as to how to properly quote previous mails so
> that the format is standard.
The convention is to prefix the quoted part with >. Sensible MUAs will
identify that as a quote and make it stand out appropriately.
___
Hi All,
As I use gmail's old webmail interface, I would appreciate as to how
to properly quote previous mails so that the format is standard.
Thanks
On 14/12/2015, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13 Dec 2015 Aitor wrote:
> Creating a 'netman.desktop' file in '/etc/xdg/autostart' directory,
>
Hi,
On 13 Dec 2015 Aitor wrote:
Creating a 'netman.desktop' file in '/etc/xdg/autostart' directory,
netman will start automatically.
I am thinking about making autostarting and connecting automatically
to wifi optional during the installation process of netman. This
means, I need to write a post
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:18:25 -0500
Steve Litt wrote:
> And once again, let me summarize: On mailing lists, the priority is
> *clarity*, which is best achieved with interleave-posting. Bottom
> posting is compatible with interleave posting: Top posting is not, and
> throws all descendants of the t
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 19:26:50 +0100
Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi Svante,
>
> I think, it is irritating to first having to scroll down text others
> have written rather than the text the latest poster has written. If
> the latest poster wants his readers to refer to ealier posts, he can
> state that
Hi All,
Running dpkg-buildpackage under netman/ produced two .deb packages one
for the gui and one for the CLI backend. I inspected the packages'
content using Xarchiver and confirmed they look to contain what they
should. However, I am no Debian packager and cannot be certain that
the resultant t
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:49:44PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Edward Bartolo writes:
> > I think, it is irritating to first having to scroll down text others
> > have written rather than the text the latest poster has written. If
> > the latest poster wants his readers to refer to ealier post
Edward Bartolo [2015-12-11 19:26]:
> I think, it is irritating to first having to scroll down text others
> have written rather than the text the latest poster has written. If
> the latest poster wants his readers to refer to ealier posts, he can
> state that in his reply.
>
> I don't consider th
Edward Bartolo writes:
> I think, it is irritating to first having to scroll down text others
> have written rather than the text the latest poster has written. If
> the latest poster wants his readers to refer to ealier posts, he can
> state that in his reply.
>
> I don't consider this netiquitte
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 19:26:50 +0100
Edward Bartolo wrote:
> I think, it is irritating to first having to scroll down text others
> have written rather than the text the latest poster has written. If
> the latest poster wants his readers to refer to ealier posts, he can
> state that in his reply.
Hi Svante,
I think, it is irritating to first having to scroll down text others
have written rather than the text the latest poster has written. If
the latest poster wants his readers to refer to ealier posts, he can
state that in his reply.
I don't consider this netiquitte, but rather, a writing
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 23:07 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Thanks for your help. I will have a deeper look at netman/debian
> tomorrow. Instead of separating the debianization directory contents ,
> I can create a debianized netman source tree and an undebianized
> source tree. That
A netman-gtk3 is coming..., whereas we must work also in the backend,
something is wrong in realloc.
Hi Aitor,
realloc was failing because I mistakenly passed active_wifis which is
a pointer to an integer instead of active_wifi_list which is a pointer
to a list of void*. That is why the error re
Hi Rainer,
Thanks for your help. I will have a deeper look at netman/debian
tomorrow. Instead of separating the debianization directory contents ,
I can create a debianized netman source tree and an undebianized
source tree. That way, users wouldn't need to worry about having to
debianize netman.
No worries,
A netman-gtk3 is coming..., whereas we must work also in the backend,
something is wrong in realloc.
I remember some words of Steve Litt:
[...] What happens when a guy moves from a McDonal's to the Piazza
Navona [...]
Or something similar...
Aitor.
El 10/12/15 19:57, Edwar
Edward Bartolo writes:
> Forwarded to dng.
>
> On 10/12/2015, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>> I was using -p together with -f. Now, I succeeded to fully run dh_make
>> as it created the netman/debian directory. These are the file therein:
>>
>> edbarx@edbarx-pc:~/netman-0.1.1/debian$ ls -l
>> total 112
Forwarded to dng.
On 10/12/2015, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> I was using -p together with -f. Now, I succeeded to fully run dh_make
> as it created the netman/debian directory. These are the file therein:
>
> edbarx@edbarx-pc:~/netman-0.1.1/debian$ ls -l
> total 112
> -rw-r--r-- 1 edbarx edbarx 178
Edward Bartolo writes:
> I am trying to debianize netman but my efforts are still without any
> positive results. I tried dh_make to no avail
What precisely means "to no avail"?
[As I wrote in the past, I maintain about 50 'native' packages most of
which were started via dh_make]
Hi,
I am trying to debianize netman but my efforts are still without any
positive results. I tried dh_make to no avail and tried to manually
edit netman/changelog and netman/patches also without success.
Edward
On 10/12/2015, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 19:40 +0100, Edward Bar
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 19:40 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi Aitor et al,
>
> netman/changelog contains this information:
>
> netman (0.1.1~468c97d-jessie2) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * New release. Closes: #468c97d
> * Changed debian/netman-backend.postinst
> * Changed debian/rules.
T
ne may wish to manually edit package
> configuration files instead of using tools. The reason is simply to
> understand what these files contain and their function.
>
>
> Edward
>
>
>
> On 09/12/2015, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> Steve Litt writes:
>>&g
From: Steve Litt
>>> Subject: Re: [DNG] Debianising my uploaded version of netman.
>>>
>>
>>> Anyone know a good source of GIT learning that's self-discoverable and
>>> has a reasonable learning curve from know-nothing to expert?
>>
>>
>&g
Steve Litt writes:
>> From: Steve Litt
>> Subject: Re: [DNG] Debianising my uploaded version of netman.
>>
>
>> Anyone know a good source of GIT learning that's self-discoverable and
>> has a reasonable learning curve from know-nothing to exp
> From: Steve Litt
> Subject: Re: [DNG] Debianising my uploaded version of netman.
>
> Anyone know a good source of GIT learning that's self-discoverable and
> has a reasonable learning curve from know-nothing to expert?
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:57:01 + (UTC)
Steve Litt writes:
[...]
> GIT is everywhere, now. I need to stop being that guy who looks up a
> few commands and dabbles with GIT, and start being a GIT expert.
My personal theory on that is "university education is futile" and the
only way to learn something is to use it.
___
Hi Steve,
Here you are a good tutorial about GIT:
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v1
You can find also a lot of video tutorials in youtube.
Cheers,
Aitor.
On 09/12/15 17:57, Steve Litt wrote:
Anyone know a good source of GIT learning that's self-discoverable and
has a reasonable learning cu
This may help:
http://git-scm.com/book/en/v2
From: Steve Litt
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [DNG] Debianising my uploaded version of netman.
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:52:51 +
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Edward Bartolo writes:
&g
On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:52:51 +
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Edward Bartolo writes:
> > I applied the patch suggested yesterday by Rainer *manually* by
> > editing files. I am lost here and I am hesitant to mess with git as
> > it can easily damage my sources.
>
> While I have some "areas of d
Hi Svante and Edward,
Here is is my debian/control:|
|https://git.devuan.org/aitor_czr/netman/blob/gbp-master/debian/control
I specify the |fp-units-gfx-2.6.4|version number.
I would also separate netman-backend from netman-backend-dev.
Aitor.
On 09/12/15 08:48, Svante Signell wrote:
Hi
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 23:06 +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi Aitor et al,
>
> This seems to be a build dependency for the frontend. At least version
> fpc-source 2.6.2 is needed to compile the frontend. Process.inc
> exports RunCommand and this is used by the frontend.
>
> Do you know where I sh
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:06:55PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi Aitor et al,
>
> This seems to be a build dependency for the frontend. At least version
> fpc-source 2.6.2 is needed to compile the frontend. Process.inc
> exports RunCommand and this is used by the frontend.
>
> Do you know whe
Hi Aitor et al,
This seems to be a build dependency for the frontend. At least version
fpc-source 2.6.2 is needed to compile the frontend. Process.inc
exports RunCommand and this is used by the frontend.
Do you know where I should document this requirement?
Thanks
On 08/12/2015, Rainer Weikusat
Edward Bartolo writes:
> RunCommand is defined in the Process unit. As far as I can tell, it is
> named Process.inc. This is part of the fpc-source package. Mine is
> fpc-source-2.6.4 (Installed: 2.6.4+dfsg-4).
Judging from the fpc scm,
http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/tags/release_2
Hi,
RunCommand is defined in the Process unit. As far as I can tell, it is
named Process.inc. This is part of the fpc-source package. Mine is
fpc-source-2.6.4 (Installed: 2.6.4+dfsg-4).
I tested again my local netman source tree with git status which
stated again that it is the same as the upload
Edward Bartolo writes:
> I applied the patch suggested yesterday by Rainer *manually* by
> editing files. I am lost here and I am hesitant to mess with git as it
> can easily damage my sources.
While I have some "areas of disagreement" with git, it isn't that
bad. In particular, you can always us
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 07:25:55PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I applied the patch suggested yesterday by Rainer *manually* by
> editing files. I am lost here and I am hesitant to mess with git as it
> can easily damage my sources.
>
I belive that patch was meant to be applied usi
Hi All,
I applied the patch suggested yesterday by Rainer *manually* by
editing files. I am lost here and I am hesitant to mess with git as it
can easily damage my sources.
Edward
On 08/12/2015, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Edward Bartolo writes:
>> On 07/12/2015, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>>> Hi Ai
Edward Bartolo writes:
> On 07/12/2015, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>> Hi Aitor,
>>
>> Thanks for granting me permission. I will now start editing some files
>> under netman/debian so that dpkg-buildpackage works.
>>
>> I am getting this error:
>> dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0
I forgot to add the changes to debian/changelog, increasing
automatically from jessie2 to jessie3 (the upstream branch hasn't
changed, we only added a quilt patch to the debian branch):
$ git-dch --ignore-branch --auto --full
After that, you can do some minor refinements handly to debian/chang
Hi Edward,
The following procedure is from the point of view of a package mantainer.
Once you cloned the git repository, the branch by default will be the
master branch (in the most of the cases). Don't change this branch.
Checkout the gbp-master branch, instead of the master branch. It
inclu
Forwarded to dng.
On 07/12/2015, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi Aitor,
>
> Thanks for granting me permission. I will now start editing some files
> under netman/debian so that dpkg-buildpackage works.
>
> I am getting this error:
> dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)': no
67 matches
Mail list logo
