On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:01:49 +0200
Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 01:49:32PM +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is there any possibility to package for devuan xdgmenumaker (1) (2)?
> >
> > It's a rocksolid and very nice menumaker which makes for *ANY*
> > *boxes b
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 01:49:32PM +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any possibility to package for devuan xdgmenumaker (1) (2)?
>
> It's a rocksolid and very nice menumaker which makes for *ANY* *boxes
> based desktop a xdgcompliant menu (which especially in debian
> with its
On 06/21/2016 02:00 PM, wrote:
Hi!
Is there any possibility to package for devuan xdgmenumaker (1) (2)?
It's a rocksolid and very nice menumaker which makes for*ANY* *boxes
based desktop a xdgcompliant menu (which especially in debian
with its awful menu system is badly needed).
1)ht
Hi!
Is there any possibility to package for devuan xdgmenumaker (1) (2)?
It's a rocksolid and very nice menumaker which makes for *ANY* *boxes
based desktop a xdgcompliant menu (which especially in debian
with its awful menu system is badly needed).
1) https://github.com/gapan/xdgmenumaker
I don't use debian menu anywhere I don't like what it does to the menus.
I built my jwm menu by hand and modelled it on the xfce menu structure.
I think it's quite reasonable to make package requests as I don't think
devuan currently have backports.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:08 AM, wrote:
> A
As for package requests i have a question:
Is it acceptable to make proposals or would feel innecesserily stressed?
(I'd like to have several small tools, which are available on git but
not in the repositories, having in mind to put together the stuff for a
jwm desktop as an option in tasksel. On
Am Sun, 19 Jun 2016 09:17:26 +1000
schrieb Ozi Traveller :
Hi Ozi!
> Hi emninger
>
> I have ceni_2015.07.06+nmu1_all.deb installed in devuan stable.
>
> Ozi
That's great, thankyou very much. May be you can put it also to ascii?
As for this, just a question: On one machine i have running devua
Hi emninger
I have ceni_2015.07.06+nmu1_all.deb installed in devuan stable.
Ozi
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 7:48 PM, wrote:
> I would like to have ceni in the devuan packages. Ceni can be found
> here (the amd_64 version):
> http://packages.siduction.org/?Repositories:extra_amd64
>
> In the practi
I would like to have ceni in the devuan packages. Ceni can be found
here (the amd_64 version):
http://packages.siduction.org/?Repositories:extra_amd64
In the practical use, i think it's a robust and very easy to use
ncurses based tool. It's advantage is, once it is set up (practically
it uses wpas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:08 -0400 (EDT)
Peter Olson wrote:
> > On June 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM Irrwahn wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
> >
> > [About possible branding issues for a hypothetical
> > futur
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 04:15:00 -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:37:29AM +0200, Irrwahn wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:08 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
>>> On June 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM Irrwahn wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:37:29AM +0200, Irrwahn wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:08 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
> > On June 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM Irrwahn wrote:
> >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This is why there is Iceweasel instead of Firefox.
>
Le 14/06/2016 01:34, dev1fanboy a écrit :
I have heard Debian will follow the ESR releases (even in stable) so avoiding
any of that whilst having a non chrom(e|ium) browser will be harder if that's
true.
Actually, if you apt-get upgrade Devuan Jessie now, it will replace
Iceweasel with
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:04:08 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
> On June 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM Irrwahn wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
>>>
>>> This is why there is Iceweasel instead of Firefox.
>>
>> Not anymore. It's plain "firefox" from Ascii (=Stretch) on.
>
> On June 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM Irrwahn wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
>
> [About possible branding issues for a hypothetical
> future Pale Moon package in De(vu|bi)an.]
>
> > This is why there is Iceweasel instead of Firefox.
>
> Not anymore. It's plain
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:37:59 -0400 (EDT), Peter Olson wrote:
[About possible branding issues for a hypothetical
future Pale Moon package in De(vu|bi)an.]
> This is why there is Iceweasel instead of Firefox.
Not anymore. It's plain "firefox" from Ascii (=Stretch) on.
[...]
> My vote: Europa. O
> On June 13, 2016 at 9:57 PM Steve Litt wrote:
> > Only issue with pale moon is the branding:
> > https://www.palemoon.org/branding.shtml
> >
> > Not sure if that's compatible with the main repo, maybe it needs
> > rebranding first?
> Yeah, just call it Bright Star, and swap the pale moon grap
Also I heard they do include some non restricted graphic in their sources as
the default when building, the graphic they use in the binary builds is the one
they use those terms for I believe.
Cheers,
chillfan
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:32 AM, dev1fanboy
wrote:
> Yeah it's a pretty great b
Yeah it's a pretty great browser, rename/rebrand and it won't matter. Best to
stay away from the whole "the brand is ours" thing. All one needs really is a
graphic that looks like a moon or other various space "rock" and it'll be fine.
Cheers,
chillfan
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 2:57 AM, Steve
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:34:23 +0100
"dev1fanboy" wrote:
> It would be nice to have palemoon, they are pretty open to choice and
> are specifically against adding any DRM support in their browser.
> Also, it works with XUL and doesn't have the bloat that Iceweasel
> does that is annoying people in
It would be nice to have palemoon, they are pretty open to choice and are
specifically against adding any DRM support in their browser. Also, it works
with XUL and doesn't have the bloat that Iceweasel does that is annoying people
in later releases. I have heard Debian will follow the ESR releas
Am Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:48:02 +
schrieb Go Linux :
> I use palemoon sometimes. I actually run it (and tor) from my /user
> directory. The problem with ANY browser other than FF/Iceweasel is
> the lack of addons - I use about 25. (Chrome is the worst at this.)
> Palemoon has some of them avai
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:16:50 +0200
wrote:
> Would it be possible to package palemoon for devuan?
>
> Since a while, i am unhappy with firefox/iceweasel and trying here and
> there i found that, from a users point of view, palemoon would be a
> very valid and viable substitute.
Thanks very much
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:08:04 +0200, Emninger wrote:
>
> I wanted to add a question: If devuan wants to stay small and compact,
> which as a principle is fine IMHO,
AIUI, Devuan strives to be versatile, not necessarily compact.
That would be a characteristic of some (in want of a better
word) De
Am Sat, 11 Jun 2016 04:33:34 +
schrieb Irrwahn :
> The deb-packaged version by Steven Pusser I already mentioned
> in another subthread did not show such issues at the time I
> installed it:
>
> https://software.opensuse.org/download.html?project=home%3Astevenpusser&package=palemoon
>
> N
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:10:52 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> By the way, thanks to emninger for pointing out the existence of
> Palemoon. If I can get it to get over this libpepperflashplayer.so
> problem, it shows promise to be a decent browser in an era when every
> other browser sucks bigtime.
The d
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 19:47:36 +0200, Paweł Cholewiński wrote:
> Does Palemoon support sandboxing tabs?
Are you by any chance referring to the recent FF "e10s"[1] buzz?
A broken re-implementation of something Chrome allegedly does
right? Whose net value is giving off a false sense of security,
a
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:23:41 +0200
Jaromil wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible to package palemoon for devuan?
>
> Are there a reasons for that?
>
> I use palemoon myself on Devuan. Just downloaded their bundle and
> opened in /opt/palemoon, se
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:37:09 +
Noel Torres wrote:
> Jaromil escribió:
>
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
> >
> >> Would it be possible to package palemoon for devuan?
> >
> > Are there a reasons for that?
> >
> > I use palemoon myself on Devuan. Just downloaded their
W dniu 10.06.2016 o 18:54, Irrwahn pisze:
> No more (noticeable) memory leakage
> in the program itself, no more mind-boggling massive Xorg
> resource leakage, quick to start up, responsive to user
> actions. A browser as it should be — i.e. not getting in the
> way of the user.
Does Palemoon
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Irrwahn wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:31:12 + (UTC), Go Linux wrote:
> > I wouldn't mind seeing palemoon in the devuan repos because
> > I suspect that eventually FF will become unusable (for me at
> > least).
>
> I switched to Palemoon a few weeks ago. After 10+ ye
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:31:12 + (UTC), Go Linux wrote:
> I wouldn't mind seeing palemoon in the devuan repos because
> I suspect that eventually FF will become unusable (for me at
> least).
I switched to Palemoon a few weeks ago. After 10+ years FF
had de facto become unusable for me, afte
On Fri, 6/10/16, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] package request
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Friday, June 10, 2016, 10:10 AM
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:57:06PM +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
> Am Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:36:05 +
> schrieb dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org:
>
&g
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:57:06PM +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
> Am Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:36:05 +
> schrieb dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org:
>
> > > Would it be possible to package palemoon for devuan?
> >
> > Are there a reasons for that?
> >
> > I use palemoon myself on Devuan. Just downl
Am Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:36:05 +
schrieb dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org:
> > Would it be possible to package palemoon for devuan?
>
> Are there a reasons for that?
>
> I use palemoon myself on Devuan. Just downloaded their bundle and
> opened in /opt/palemoon, set the bin in PATH and ready for u
Jaromil escribió:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
Would it be possible to package palemoon for devuan?
Are there a reasons for that?
I use palemoon myself on Devuan. Just downloaded their bundle and
opened in /opt/palemoon, set the bin in PATH and ready for use. It
also no
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
> Would it be possible to package palemoon for devuan?
Are there a reasons for that?
I use palemoon myself on Devuan. Just downloaded their bundle and
opened in /opt/palemoon, set the bin in PATH and ready for use. It
also notices me for upstream u
Would it be possible to package palemoon for devuan?
Since a while, i am unhappy with firefox/iceweasel and trying here and
there i found that, from a users point of view, palemoon would be a
very valid and viable substitute.
As far as i am able to check, most, if not all privacy related settings
38 matches
Mail list logo
