Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-20 Thread Irrwahn
On Fri, 20 May 2016 15:40:59 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2016 09:26:38 +0200 > Irrwahn wrote: > >> On Fri, 20 May 2016 08:04:07 +1000, Ozi Traveller wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> As a jwm user I would really like to see it brought up to date. >> >> Please excuse me for nitpicking here onc

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-20 Thread Steve Litt
On Fri, 20 May 2016 09:26:38 +0200 Irrwahn wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2016 08:04:07 +1000, Ozi Traveller wrote: > > +1 > > > > As a jwm user I would really like to see it brought up to date. > > Please excuse me for nitpicking here once again: > > The De[bi|vu]an jwm package *is* up to date. Th

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-20 Thread Irrwahn
On Fri, 20 May 2016 08:04:07 +1000, Ozi Traveller wrote: > +1 > > As a jwm user I would really like to see it brought up to date. Please excuse me for nitpicking here once again: The De[bi|vu]an jwm package *is* up to date. The only thing that'd need to be changed (dropped in this case) is a pa

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-19 Thread Ozi Traveller
+1 As a jwm user I would really like to see it brought up to date. On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Irrwahn wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2016 17:48:33 +0200, Irrwahn Grausewitz wrote: > > > Looking at the source package I cannot see a single > > invasive patch WRT to the original source. > > > Cor

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-19 Thread Irrwahn
On Thu, 19 May 2016 17:48:33 +0200, Irrwahn Grausewitz wrote: > Looking at the source package I cannot see a single > invasive patch WRT to the original source. Correction: I missed a patch when skimming over the package contents. I can see now what you meant by "Debianisms". Sorry for the co

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-19 Thread Irrwahn
On Thu, 19 May 2016 11:32:47 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2016 10:01:27 +0200 > Irrwahn wrote: > >> On Sun, 15 May 2016 09:39:29 +1000, Ozi Traveller wrote: >>> I agree, and I think JWM in out of date, as the version of the >>> source from the developer's site is much later. >> >>

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-19 Thread Steve Litt
On Thu, 19 May 2016 10:01:27 +0200 Irrwahn wrote: > On Sun, 15 May 2016 09:39:29 +1000, Ozi Traveller wrote: > > I agree, and I think JWM in out of date, as the version of the > > source from the developer's site is much later. > > The version of JWM in Debian Sid (and thus in Devuan > Ceres)

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-19 Thread emninger
Am Thu, 19 May 2016 10:41:02 + schrieb Irrwahn : > On Sun, 15 May 2016 09:39:29 +1000, Ozi Traveller wrote: > > I agree, and I think JWM in out of date, as the version of the > > source from the developer's site is much later. > > The version of JWM in Debian Sid (and thus in Devuan > Cere

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-19 Thread Irrwahn
On Sun, 15 May 2016 09:39:29 +1000, Ozi Traveller wrote: > I agree, and I think JWM in out of date, as the version of the source from > the developer's site is much later. The version of JWM in Debian Sid (and thus in Devuan Ceres) is 2.3.5, which is the current release. Cf. http://joewing.net/p

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-14 Thread Ozi Traveller
I agree, and I think JWM in out of date, as the version of the source from the developer's site is much later. I have some JWM images I created with live-build if your are interested. They also have dmenu installed. https://sourceforge.net/projects/linnix/files/ Ozi On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:10

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release (Steve Litt)

2016-05-14 Thread emninger
Am Sat, 14 May 2016 19:21:29 + schrieb dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org: > But as I said before, I think Debian's JWM package is so bad that > either the package should be refactored, or JWM should be compiled fro > source. Hola. Try out this ~.jwmrc: $HOME/.jwm/keys $HOME/.jwm/m

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release (Steve Litt)

2016-05-14 Thread emninger
Am Sat, 14 May 2016 19:21:29 + schrieb dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org: > But as I said before, I think Debian's JWM package is so bad that > either the package should be refactored, or JWM should be compiled fro > source. Hola. Try out this ~.jwmrc: $HOME/.jwm/keys $HOME/.jwm/m

Re: [DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 14 May 2016 16:46:30 +0200 wrote: > Am Sat, 14 May 2016 11:21:02 + > schrieb Steve Litt > > > Do you know if JWM enables one to configure hotkeys to run programs, > > such as running xterm when you press F5 or whatever? > > This is the keys file of Manjaro JWM OpenRC edition (you

[DNG] JWM: was Some questions re the devuan release

2016-05-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 14 May 2016 00:13:28 +0200 wrote: > 4) As for the desktop: On another machine i use Manjaro JWM Open-RC - > and from a functional (and esthetical!) point of view it's marvellous. JWM is wonderful. Extremely low memory, very fast performance. I reviewed it here: http://troubleshooters.c