On Fri, 20 May 2016 08:04:07 +1000, Ozi Traveller wrote: > +1 > > As a jwm user I would really like to see it brought up to date.
Please excuse me for nitpicking here once again: The De[bi|vu]an jwm package *is* up to date. The only thing that'd need to be changed (dropped in this case) is a patch that makes some trivial cosmetic changes to the example.jwmrc file. And that'd only serve to relieve the end-user of the burden of applying some miniscule edits to his jwmrc configuration file. I suspect it would have taken me less time to do just that, than it took me to type this message — if only I had the skills necessary to maintain a deb package. (Maybe I just have to dive into the domain of packaging. After all, the Devuan project's bus factor is still alarmingly low!) Also note, that a fork would most likely not affect Devuan Jessie, since (approaching beta2) it is far too late to introduce non-bugfix changes, I assume. Best regards Urban > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Irrwahn <irrw...@freenet.de > <mailto:irrw...@freenet.de>> wrote: > > On Thu, 19 May 2016 17:48:33 +0200, Irrwahn Grausewitz wrote: > <snip> > > Looking at the source package I cannot see a single > > invasive patch WRT to the original source. > <snip> > > Correction: I missed a patch when skimming over the > package contents. I can see now what you meant by > "Debianisms". Sorry for the confusion! > > A Devuan fork of jwm would make sense then, and it'd > be a trivial one at that. > > Regards > Urban > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org <mailto:Dng@lists.dyne.org> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > > _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
