Re: [DNG] Bug in synaptic package manager?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 03:30 +0200, Boian Bonev wrote: > > > Hi, > > a stupid question, could the templates be added to the base-files package > > that is already forked? > > It is not stupid at all - technically that is possible because there would

Re: [DNG] Functional languages

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 12:01:56PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > Nikolaus Klepp via Dng said on Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:55:30 +0100 > > >Anno domini 2022 Tue, 1 Feb 11:44:37 -0500 > > Steve Litt scripsit: > > >> In the hands of anything but a very careful and > >> security-knowledgeable programmer, writi

Re: [DNG] questions further into networking

o1bigtenor via Dng wrote: > When this (streaming device only works with the vendor's DNS) happens > - - - is there a way to > counter or change that particular behavior? > > (Fascinating what's all connected!!!) Obviously when you buy those closed boxes, you get what’s lent and it does what th

Re: [DNG] Scheme/Lisp: was What is your take on finit?

Anno domini 2022 Tue, 1 Feb 12:01:56 -0500 Steve Litt scripsit: > Nikolaus Klepp via Dng said on Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:55:30 +0100 > > >Anno domini 2022 Tue, 1 Feb 11:44:37 -0500 > > Steve Litt scripsit: > > >> In the hands of anything but a very careful and > >> security-knowledgeable programmer,

Re: [DNG] IPv6 for dummies by a dummy (was: Configuring ethernet port for IPv6)

o1bigtenor via Dng wrote: > I hope that others might also contribute even questions and thereby > a document in the 'how to' class is created. In many ways that’s a better way - there’s only so much generic stuff you can throw at someone before they get overwhelmed. If anyone does have specific

Re: [DNG] Scheme/Lisp: was What is your take on finit?

On Tuesday 01 February 2022 at 18:01:56, Steve Litt wrote: > How can I acquire the proper mindset to do Scheme or other functional > languages the right way, so I can finally start functional programming > that doesn't have a C accent? From personal experience I suspect the only answer to that is

Re: [DNG] What is your take on finit?

On Tuesday 01 February 2022 at 17:55:30, Nikolaus Klepp via Dng wrote: > Anno domini 2022 Tue, 1 Feb 11:44:37 -0500 Steve Litt scripsit: > > > > In the hands of anything but a very careful and security-knowledgeable > > programmer, writing Python3 is more secure than writing C. You could > > thi

[DNG] Scheme/Lisp: was What is your take on finit?

Nikolaus Klepp via Dng said on Tue, 1 Feb 2022 17:55:30 +0100 >Anno domini 2022 Tue, 1 Feb 11:44:37 -0500 > Steve Litt scripsit: >> In the hands of anything but a very careful and >> security-knowledgeable programmer, writing Python3 is more secure >> than writing C. You could think of Python3 as

Re: [DNG] What is your take on finit?

Anno domini 2022 Tue, 1 Feb 11:44:37 -0500 Steve Litt scripsit: > tito via Dng said on Tue, 1 Feb 2022 13:49:30 +0100 > > >On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 09:50:31 +0100 > >Didier Kryn wrote: > > > >> Le 31/01/2022 à 19:16, Steve Litt a écrit : > >> >>     Writing a self-daemonizing daemon in C was a rout

Re: [DNG] What is your take on finit?

tito via Dng said on Tue, 1 Feb 2022 13:49:30 +0100 >On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 09:50:31 +0100 >Didier Kryn wrote: > >> Le 31/01/2022 à 19:16, Steve Litt a écrit : >> >>     Writing a self-daemonizing daemon in C was a routine when I >> >> was still active, though I understand it could be more difficu

Re: [DNG] What is your take on finit?

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:50:31AM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 31/01/2022 à 19:16, Steve Litt a écrit : > > >     Writing a self-daemonizing daemon in C was a routine when I was > > > still active, though I understand it could be more difficult in shell. > > But more difficult in Python. I try

Re: [DNG] What is your take on finit?

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:49:30PM +0100, tito via Dng wrote: > On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 09:50:31 +0100 > Didier Kryn wrote: > > > Le 31/01/2022 à 19:16, Steve Litt a écrit : > > >>     Writing a self-daemonizing daemon in C was a routine when I was > > >> still active, though I understand it could be

Re: [DNG] What is your take on finit?

On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 09:50:31 +0100 Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 31/01/2022 à 19:16, Steve Litt a écrit : > >>     Writing a self-daemonizing daemon in C was a routine when I was > >> still active, though I understand it could be more difficult in shell. > > But more difficult in Python. I try to stay

Re: [DNG] What is your take on finit?

Le 31/01/2022 à 19:16, Steve Litt a écrit :     Writing a self-daemonizing daemon in C was a routine when I was still active, though I understand it could be more difficult in shell. But more difficult in Python. I try to stay away from C if Python does the job. I think Python3 plus its standar

[DNG] 3 GoLUG meeting presentations

Hi all, The GoLUG meeting at 7pm on Wednesday 2/2/2022 7PM Eastern (New York) time, features three short presentations, as detailed at http://golug.info. Due to time constraints, we're not taking any more presenters for the 2/2/2022 meeting. Presentations plus each presentation's 10 minute quest