On Sat, 8 May 2021 09:40:51 +0300
Dimitris via Dng wrote:
> do you ping anything while on these delays? if you're losing many
> packages, then i'd call ISP first to check dsl line..
I once had significant packet loss and my ISPs solution was to actually
_lower_ my speeds to reduce it.
I have n
browser delays could be due to slow dns resolving.. i'd also suggest a
local caching resolver as ralph suggested...
do you ping anything while on these delays? if you're losing many
packages, then i'd call ISP first to check dsl line..
some tools for network traffic : iftop, nload, nethogs, v
Hello terry,
The packages present in the backports channel comes from the next
unstable (bullseye/chimaera). Where as the proposed-updates (and **not**
upgrades) are the packages who are being prepared for the next stable
point release. It is debian's review process to make sure nothing
breaks.
C
On 8/5/21 11:13 am, Gastón via Dng wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:20:23AM +0800, Brad Campbell via Dng wrote:
>> On 7/5/21 2:21 pm, Thomas Besser via Dng wrote:
>>> Am 06.05.21 um 20:53 schrieb Ludovic Bellière:
You mean this[1] package?
[1]:
https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi
On Sat, 8 May 2021 00:13:11 -0300
Gastón via Dng wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:20:23AM +0800, Brad Campbell via Dng wrote:
> > Is there a better way to be able to install the required packages
> > without having to individually name each one and the version?
>
> yes, you can try to do i
On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:20:23AM +0800, Brad Campbell via Dng wrote:
> On 7/5/21 2:21 pm, Thomas Besser via Dng wrote:
> > Am 06.05.21 um 20:53 schrieb Ludovic Bellière:
> >> You mean this[1] package?
> >>
> >> [1]:
> >> https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/package-query.html?c=package&q=exim4=4.9
On 7/5/21 2:21 pm, Thomas Besser via Dng wrote:
> Am 06.05.21 um 20:53 schrieb Ludovic Bellière:
>> You mean this[1] package?
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://pkginfo.devuan.org/cgi-bin/package-query.html?c=package&q=exim4=4.92-8+deb10u6
>
> It's a platform independent ('all') package.
>
> Look at
> https
2021-05-08 09:02 に Hendrik Boom さんは書きました:
I've been having trouble using zoom recently.
If there's a large meeting, no questions I ask can heard clearly,
even if the meeting uses the protocol of muting everyone else.
I also have problems with short browser delays that may last a few
seconds to a
On ven, 07 mai 2021, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> [snip]
> The phone company now opines that the data rate on the connection is
> barely sufficient for a multiparty zoom connection, and this is because
> of the distance to the exchange.
>
>
>
> Now I'd like to measure what's going on in my syste
On Fri, 7 May 2021 20:02:13 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I've been having trouble using zoom recently.
> If there's a large meeting, no questions I ask can heard clearly,
> even if the meeting uses the protocol of muting everyone else.
>
> I also have problems with short browser delays that may l
On 5/7/21 5:02 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I've been having trouble using zoom recently.
If there's a large meeting, no questions I ask can heard clearly,
even if the meeting uses the protocol of muting everyone else.
I also have problems with short browser delays that may last a few
seconds to a mi
I've been having trouble using zoom recently.
If there's a large meeting, no questions I ask can heard clearly,
even if the meeting uses the protocol of muting everyone else.
I also have problems with short browser delays that may last a few
seconds to a minute or so.
However, the pppoe connecti
marc said on Fri, 7 May 2021 01:05:03 +0200
>So the below words aren't directed at anybody in particular:
>
> It is easy to gloat
>
>And it is true that this particular bit of malware tries to blend in
>amongst the many cryptic helper processes that both systemd-based
>distributions and gnome des
On 29/4/21 8:14 pm, tito via Dng wrote:
> Hi,
> by looking at the latest git code:
>
> static const struct op operators[] ALIGN_PTR = {
> #if ENABLE_FEATURE_DC_LIBM
> {"^", power},
> //{"exp", power},
> //{"pow", power},
> #endif
> {"%", mod},
> //{"mod", mod},
>
Hello
> It's irrational to talk about rootkits as if they were a security threat
> (and my apologies in advance if, as seems likely, you're fully aware of
> the difference; in these discussions, there will always be other readers
> who don't.
Apologies accepted :)
> By definition, a rootkit is
15 matches
Mail list logo
