Hi all!
I wanted to say thank you to you all for patience and your help. I've
finished now, more or less, my installation with a "custom made" jwm
desktop. So far, so fine.
The remaining logout problem, seems to be solved by the installation of
lxdm (which is not that much bigger than slim; i als
Some time ago Ozi Traveller helped me out for my logout problem sending
me 2 desktop environment independent logout tools (cb-exit and
oblogout, which essentially do the same, only oblogout is a bit more
eye candy). I had some problems with them but solved by changing the
localauthority settings of
- Original Message -
> From: emnin...@riseup.net
> Is there a link to an instruction how to use (and setup) openrc
> together with sysvinit?
>
> I'd like to use openrc as a tool to administrate daemons and services
> since i find it a lot more "logical" (easy?). One question for example
>
On Thu, 26 May 2016 12:50:19 +0200
Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 11:28 +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> Please keep the subject, even if you are reading the mails via the
> Digest service!
In addition, if you respond to a digest subjected email, please change
the subject ba
On Thu, 26 May 2016 01:53:07 +0200
Dragan FOSS wrote:
> On 05/26/2016 01:23 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> > capability of respawning daemons that crash? OpenRC can't do that.
>
> OpenRC *can* do that:
>
> ---
> Automatic respawning crashed services
> ---
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Op
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 02:03:26PM +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
> I do not find the msg, but someone here suggested to use xpdf, possibly
> with a more esthetic skin.
>
> I for one, would love that, since i find xpdf really very functional
> and with acceptable print options too.
I used xpd
W dniu 26.05.2016 o 14:03, emnin...@riseup.net pisze:
>
> I for one, would love that, since i find xpdf really very functional
> and with acceptable print options too.
I don't like scrolbar, button and menu graphics in xpdf. Is it changeable?
Paweł
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
I do not find the msg, but someone here suggested to use xpdf, possibly
with a more esthetic skin.
I for one, would love that, since i find xpdf really very functional
and with acceptable print options too.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https:
Am Thu, 26 May 2016 12:50:19 +0200
schrieb Svante Signell :
> On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 11:28 +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> Please keep the subject, even if you are reading the mails via the
> Digest service!
You're right! Sorry about that, i was too fast :-( Btw, could that be
corrected ex
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 25/05/2016 18:55, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
>> Linux has the nice policy of never changing a public ABI, hence, there's
>> no problem in this respect
>
> Good to know. Although this is not true for kernel internals (if
> you write or maintain a driver) and it obviously
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 11:28 +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
Please keep the subject, even if you are reading the mails via the
Digest service!
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
I have managed to compile and package the 4.4.11 kernel following Katolaz
instructions (thank you!).
It took ages to compileand I knew I would forgot to create a initrd for
it: kernel panic at first boot!
And yet today I saw...
>Lazier:
apt-get -t jessie-backports install linux-image-4.5.0.
On Thu, 26 May 2016 11:28:49 +0200, Emninger wrote:
[...]
> First, a question: sysvinit does
> respawning?
>
> Personally, i'd like to *NOT* have it: I think it's better to restart a
> crashed service manually.
[...]
KatolaZ already replied; I just like to add:
It depends on context: E.g. for
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:28:49AM +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
> Am Thu, 26 May 2016 06:38:05 +
> schrieb Steve Litt :
>
> > Before you do this, allow me to ask you this question: Do you want the
> > capability of respawning daemons that crash? OpenRC can't do that. If
> > you prefer res
Am Thu, 26 May 2016 06:38:05 +
schrieb Steve Litt :
> Before you do this, allow me to ask you this question: Do you want the
> capability of respawning daemons that crash? OpenRC can't do that. If
> you prefer respawning, consider using s3, daemontools-encore or even
> Runit to manage your dae
Please excuse me for using - sometimes - a wrong (not subscribed) smtp
server. Using several mail services for different purposes, soemtimes i
was too hasty sending a mail out. So, sorry for that. (I hoped, being
not registered with that account, the mails wouldn't be accepted ;) ).
Cheers!
__
Le 26/05/2016 01:23, Steve Litt a écrit :
Many people feel that respawning is a pact with the devil: If something
crashes, it should stay crashed for further investigation rather than
"painting over it" with a respawn. If you feel that way, OpenRC is a
good bet.
The arguments pro and cons a
Hi Edward,
El 26/05/16 a las 09:34, Edward Bartolo escribió:
Hi,
While running 'git buildpackage' to test building a .deb package for
simple-netaid-lightweight I am receiving this error:
Error:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
debian/simple-netaid-lightweig
W dniu 26.05.2016 o 09:34, Edward Bartolo pisze:
> Hi,
>
> While running 'git buildpackage' to test building a .deb package for
> simple-netaid-lightweight I am receiving this error:
>
> Error:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
> debian/simple-netaid-lightweig
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. I applied the suggested changes to Makefile
and git push-ed to repository. There is still a non-fatal error about
linking against unnecessary libraries that has to be debugged. I will
git push as soon as I find a solution.
Edward
On 25/05/2016, aitor_czr wrote:
>
>
Hi,
While running 'git buildpackage' to test building a .deb package for
simple-netaid-lightweight I am receiving this error:
Error:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
debian/simple-netaid-lightweight/usr/bin/sn-lightweight was not linked
against libfreetype.so.6
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 08:56:03AM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a user of SLIM. What is wrong with it? I read that it is not
> being actively developed. Does it mean a project has to be
> continuously developed to be used? Aren't bug reports and bug fixes
> NOT enough?
>
> Software
22 matches
Mail list logo
