On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Collin Anderson
wrote:
> Taking the example from:
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/aggregation/#filter-and-exclude
>
> Publisher.objects.filter(book__rating__gt=3.0).annotate(num_books=Count
> ('book'))
>
> Is there anyway to have the filter only ap
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Yannick Gingras wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> The django translation sprint was a clear success. A team of eight
> sprinters worked on the Django documentation and after an intense
> training session on the toolchain, we were able complete a sizable
> part of the API
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Malcolm Box wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On the quest for performance I'm now having a look at Django's caching
> framework.
>
> I've got a simple question that I can't find the answer to: if the data
> that a view depends on changes, does Django do anything smart to invalida
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Malcolm Box wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Malcolm Box
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I've got a simple question that I can't fi
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Malcolm Box wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got an existing unit test suite using the django.test.TestCase class
> that exercises the HTTP interface of the site, but running under Django's
> test harness.
>
> I'd like to turn this into a black-box test suite, using real HTTP
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Henrik Genssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using memcached for caching my sites. The documentation says when
> not to use it:
> http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/WhyNotMemcached
>
> one point is output larger 1 MB
Ok - please stop. This is the third time you have
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Atamert Ölçgen wrote:
> On Saturday 23 January 2010 13:24:44 chiranjeevi.muttoju wrote:
>> please reply if anybody know what it is..
>>
>> thank you..
>>
> It would be helpful if you send the code for the models you are trying to
> syncdb.
Indeed it would. The cod
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Kevin Ar18 wrote:
> The documentation says:
> "You can use a database backend that doesn't ship with Django by setting
> DATABASE_ENGINE to a fully-qualified path (i.e.
> mypackage.backends.whatever)."
>
> So, I installed PG8000. It is an egg inside of "Python\Li
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:23 AM, FxFocus wrote:
> On Jan 27, 4:55 pm, Achim Domma wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm interested in buying the "Pro Django" book. I could not find any
>> hint about what version it's written for. As it covers mostly
>> internals and the ideas behind Django, it should not be ou
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:07 AM, thanos wrote:
> It's useless. The "The definitive guide to Django" by Holovaty and
> Kaplan-moss is okay, but the Pro version is really just a waste of
> paper and time.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but I must say my opinion is the
exact opposite. Yes, Pro
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Chris Curvey wrote:
> Is there a way to use raw SQL with multiple databases? I thought it
> might be something like:
>
> from django.db import connection
> cursor = connection.cursor(using="mydb")
>
> but that complains about an unexpected keyword arg.
It is pos
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Sebastian Pawlus
wrote:
> Hi everyone
> I've very confusing issue related whit databases performance. I've took two
> database engines and compared their performance during typical run for
> project test suite.
> results:
> MySQL: Ran 241 tests in 533.822s
> Postgr
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Sebastian Pawlus
wrote:
> Thanks Russell, your answer was more than helpful. It really worked for me.
> There were some problems on Django 1.0 but after that (1.1 and up) every
> thing looks good. Performance of database looks much better right now.
> I'm also wan
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:38 AM, chefsmart wrote:
> Let's say I have two models - Article and Publication. Article has a
> field
>
> publications = models.ManyToManyField(Publication)
>
> Let's say I present the user with a series of checkboxes representing
> publications (much like the ModelMult
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:01 PM, knight wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use some fixtures in my tests.
> I have cms_sample app and a fixtures folder inside with
> cms_sample_data.xml
>
> I use the following in my test.py:
>
> class Funtionality(TestCase):
> fixtures = ['cms_sample_data']
There are
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Turner wrote:
> On Jan 19, 1:36 pm, Andrew Turner wrote:
>> I have an initial_data.json file which provides some, er, initial data
>> whenever I run syncdb. One of my models has a DateTimeField with
>> auto_now_add=True. The data is loaded first time round,
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 Feb 2010 4:04:15 pm Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
>> on upgrading to the latest svn I am getting a sporadic error like this:
>> TypeError: argument 1 must be str, not unicode. On runserver, the full
>> traceback is this:
>>
>
> I
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Andrew Turner wrote:
> On Feb 2, 8:07 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> It is possible you've found a bug, but in order to verify that, we
>> need a minimal example that reproduces the problem - that is, the
>> simplest possible model an
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Andrew Turner wrote:
> On Feb 2, 1:29 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> The cause of the problem is your initial fixture. Django doesn't
>> listen to auto_now_add or auto_now fields on fixture loading - fixture
>> objects are saved in &q
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 Feb 2010 5:10:27 pm Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> >> traceback is this:
>> >
>> > I went back to 12300 - same problem, but 12200 is ok.
>>
>> Kenneth - we need two things:
&g
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 Feb 2010 10:09:44 am Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> > Exception Type: NameError at /
>> > Exception Value: global name 'query' is not defined
>>
>> This isn't the
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Ramdas S wrote:
> I just upgraded to the latest trunk SVn 12377, and this error has started
> propping up on some of my existing working code.
>
> Here is the traceback
>
> http://dpaste.com/153987/
>
>
> Apparently get_or_create is not working properly at least as
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 Feb 2010 11:44:36 am Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> Ok - seriously - if you want help debugging this, you need to get your
>> story straight.
>
> please believe me - I *am* trying. Ok, lets try to be
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Klemens Mantzos
wrote:
> hi list,
>
> checked out the new multidb feature
> (http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/multi-db/).
>
> i assumed that syncdb would only sync those models in the database
> when calling allow_syncdb() of the database routers retu
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Klemens Mantzos
wrote:
> thx!
>
> syncdb is now calling the database router before actually syncing to
> the db. but...
>
> ...stumbled upon a new problem:
>
> if i do
> python manage.py syncdb --database=default
> before i sync the users database this error comes
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Shawn Milochik wrote:
> http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
You've posted this link a few times now, Shawn, but I'd rather you
didn't make a habit of doing so.
While ESR's point is valid, and many people would benefit from
following the spirit of his ad
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Malcolm Box wrote:
>> From there, I have only been able to reduce test time down from hours
>> to minutes. Tests ought to run in seconds - so fast that you can run
>> them after every few edits - TDD.
>
> Totally agree, and what I'm looking to make Django do. At t
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Andy Cottell wrote:
>> > > I am new to django, and have started building a project in it. I have
>> > > tried to use theadmininterface with the project am having issues
>> > > logging in. I have setup the interface as instruced in the django
>> > > tutorial part 2,
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Mathieu Pillard wrote:
>> It may indeed be that the MAX clause is using "mat_foo" instead of the
>> assigned correlation U0. What happens if you paste the two SQLs into a
>> query window in PgAdmin 3 and execute them. If the 1.2 query fails
>> with the same error me
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:10 AM, br...@instantdirectmarketing.com
wrote:
> I'm completely confused about why _meta.local_fields returns more
> fields than the database table contains. The User model inherits from
> contrib.auth.models.User.
...
> I wonder if the User.add_to_class would be interpret
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Atamert Ölçgen wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2010 22:58:32 Brice Leroy wrote:
> * Please remove `auto_now` and `auto_now_add` since they're deprecated.
No, they really aren't. If they were deprecated, there would be
deprecation warnings in the code and document
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Jeff Bauer wrote:
> Update: My work-around is this:
>
> 1) Wrap views functions:
> try:
> import django.views.decorators.csrf
> # Django 1.2 stuff
> except ImportError:
> # Django 1.1 stuff
>
> 2) If running Django 1.1, register a fake c
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:55 AM, khoobks wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I was wondering if a Django guru was able to verify if my mental model
> of how django transactions operate is correct.
>
> The situation that I have is that I'd like to place the
> transaction.commit_on_success decorator around a
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:41 AM, monkut wrote:
> Just curious, but I was looking at using the post-syncdb hook and
> found that it's actually called *before* the complete syncdb command
> finishes. (Custom and indicies are run after the signal)
>
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/signal
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Greg wrote:
> I have a large-ish query which is taking ~10 seconds to run, but I can
> get it down to less than a second by changing the group by part of the
> query from
>
> GROUP BY `refunds_userprofile`.`ird_number` ,
> `auth_user`.`first_name` , `auth_user`.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Greg Brown wrote:
> Ok, here goes:
>
> First, some background - UserProfile is the
> settings.AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE and the Application model has a
> ForeignKey to User. There's ~90,000 users/userprofiles, ~110,000
> applications (most have only one application, some
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:37 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> I apologize for intruding and try not to be partisan. I will not list
> pros and cons since this is not the place for me to do so.
> I would just like to make clarifications about things being said:
And I would like to clarify some of your clari
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:16 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> Sorry Russ,
>
> I did not say nor implied that any of the points above were
> distinctive or unique. I just tried to clarify some issues raised by
> other users here.
No problems - I'm not trying to accuse you of anything nefarious. I
just wante
2010/2/20 Norbert Wójtowicz :
> Howdy,
> Just started a new project with Django trunk (have been using Django 1.1
> lately, so please bare with me).
> After I got a basic setup going I installed the latest release of south, but
> that bombed spectacularly with database errors in settings.py.
...
>
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Yes, I are
> free to choose whatever license you want for your own code, but the
> terms of the GPL mean that your own choice of license on your own
> project *may* affect whether or not I can distribute Web2py along wi
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Sithembewena Lloyd Dube
wrote:
> I wonder what Atamert the peacemaker has to say now, since the person to
> whose defense he came admitted he was wrong. Amazing to note that Atamert
> noticed my directness to Bruno, but did not notice how nasty Bruno was to
> other
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:20 PM, bobhaugen wrote:
> I see here http://toastdriven.com/fresh/whats-wrong-django-slight-return/
> a claim that "TestCase-style tests truncate and reload all the
> fixtures in your database on every test method".
>
> Is that true?
Yes. From the docs [1]:
"""
This flu
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:48 AM, felix wrote:
>
> This seems so blatant that it couldn't really be a bug without someone
> noticing. Django 1.2
>
> qs = Apt.objects.filter(list_on_web=True,is_available=True)
>
> # FastAdderStatus has Apt and Service as fk
> qs = qs.filter(fas
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:41 AM, felix wrote:
> As of 1.2 and multi-db how do I get the sql that will be produced from
> a query set ?
>
> Since 1.2 and multi-db, the previous methods are no longer working.
> Its been said here that we shouldn't depend on internal functions as
> they may change.
>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:17 AM, felix wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 9:22 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> > However getting the SQL that will be produced is essential. There
>> > needs to be a utility method somewhere that will give us this sql and
>> > it ne
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:42 AM, felix wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 12:32 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>
>> To reinforce my point - if you're using Django's ORM, you shouldn't
>> have to care about the underlying query. The ORM *should* be
>> abstra
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Manolis wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a model like this:
> class Report(models.Model):
> date_submitted = models.DateTimeField()
>
> I want to calculate some aggregate counts per month. The SQL query for
> this would be:
> SELECT YEAR(date_submitted), MONTH(date_subm
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Joan Miller wrote:
> *Sorry by this off topic message, but this is too important*
I'm sure you're deeply concerned by this issue. For the record, I am
too. However, everyone thinks that their pet issue is more important
than the rules. Allow me to assure you that
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Roach, Marshall (MROACH)
wrote:
> Hi, I was at pycon last week and heard about the db routers in django 1.2
> and I have the alpha version of django running for a project I’m running and
> trying to figure out how to do the following.
>
> I have 2 databases on diff
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:43 PM, filias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running several tests and created a fixture with the test data.
> I have one model with a custom field which has a default value.
>
> I thought my test fixture should overwrite this field for some of the
> objects but when run the test
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Joel Stransky wrote:
> When ever I create a fixture via dumpdata, I get this text prior to the
> start of the data.
>
> Please select your server identifier.
> 1) admin
> 2) aws
> 3) dipsy
> 4) dot
> 5) local
> 6) sdeng
> 7) soup
> 8) tomcat
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Michael Shafrir wrote:
> Can a date be loaded into a DateField using Django's loaddata admin
> feature? I have a JSON file that I'm using to bulk load data into my
> app. When you dumpdata, date fields are outputted in the format -
> mm-dd. However, if you try l
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Anthony wrote:
> I've got my app deployed on my production server where the application
> name == site name. (It's running fine.)
>
> I copied it down to my development machine and tried to set up the
> same thing ('python manage.py startapp [appname==sitename]'),
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Jim N wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a question-and-answer app which serializes data in JSON.
> I have Question, User, and Asking models. Asking is the many-to-many
> relationship table for Question and User, because the Asking
> relationship may be more complicate
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Jim N wrote:
> I just came across manager methods in the docs:
>
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/managers/#adding-extra-manager-methods
>
> Could I have used these to create a seriallizable QuerySet, by
> defining, say, a with_user() method inside t
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:54 PM, eXt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've upgraded my Django to 1.2 (1.2-beta-1, tried also trunk) and
> after that my application has started to throw an exception:
> ValueError: Cannot add "": instance is on database
> "default", value is is on database "None".
>
> The code cau
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Kenny Meyer wrote:
> Wilmer A. Delpratt (wdelprat...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Hi everyone..i'm new in this group...my friends says this is one of
>> the best groups...
>> I'd like to know how i can use a ManyToManyField in a "list_display",
>> i've read the documentatio
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Phlip wrote:
>> >>> (I also disagree with leaving out the spaces around =, but obviously
>> >>> obeying a team style guide supersedes improving it...)
>>
>> >> ... the goal of clarity/legibility
>>
>> > uh...
>>
>> ;) I meant *having* a style guide was consistent w
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Aljosa Mohorovic
wrote:
> according to http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.2Roadmap RC1
> marks translation string freeze, any updates on roadmap?
We've been discussing this amongst the core; we should be making some
sort of formal announcement shortly, but
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Derek wrote:
> I have noticed that, if a change list has been filtered before a record is
> edited, the filter is not restored after the editing operation is complete.
>
> a. Is there a way to automatically restore the filtered view and, if so,
> how?
>
> b. If ther
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Phlip wrote:
>> > And if the PEP8 told you to ... just jump off a cliff... would you?
>>
>> Sounds like you might benefit from actually reading it:
>
> This thread arc is about me lamenting the positive value of style
> guides, even those with wrong line-items.
>
>
Hi all,
Those of you that have been paying attention to the Django release
roadmap [1] will have noticed that the original estimated release date
for Django 1.2 final has passed, but we haven't actually made a final
release.
Although Django aims to follow a date-based release cycle, we won't
make
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Jesus Mager wrote:
> 2010/3/2 Russell Keith-Magee :
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Jim N wrote:
>>> Hi,
>
>> The short answer is you can't - at least, not out of the box. This is
>> a feature that has been proposed seve
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:16 AM, brad wrote:
> Hi all
>
> When can we expect a release of 1.1.2? Specifically I'm hoping to get
> a test bug fixed - http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12720
The most likely scenario is that we will cut 1.1.2 at the same time we
cut 1.2-final. The exact date dep
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Brian Neal wrote:
> On Mar 7, 10:48 pm, Brian Neal wrote:
>> Before the Django 1.2 beta and the class-based Feed views, I was doing
>> this to cache my RSS feeds:
>>
>> urls.py:
>> from django.contrib.syndication.views import feed as syndication_feed
>> from djan
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Simon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've found what I think is a bug in django 1.2 beta 1 (SVN-12773).
>
> The dynamic inlines works great with foreign key relationships, but
> the "Add another xxx" link doesn't appear with ManyToMany
> relationships. It seems to be becaus
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:34 AM, victor wrote:
> how to set multi natural_key dependincies?
> Model code as following:
> class Menu(models.Model):
> mName = models.CharField(max_length=256)
> mTitle = models.CharField(max_length=256)
> url = models.CharField(max_length=1024, blank=True,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Peyman wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.
> After having a look at its code, it seems that django-registration
> provides the signup feature, and uses contrib.auth for the rest.
>
> I looked at the source code of the djangoproject.com site itself (for
> me, should
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:19 PM, mbdtsmh
wrote:
> This makes alot of sense and works in my case - many thanks.
>
> However, still unclear as to how to specify which table should be
> created in which database when you do want to syncdb to both
> databases. I may have 2 tables in models.py that I
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:16 PM, cool-RR wrote:
> Hello Django community,
>
> I have started compiling a list, "Common causes for translation
> problems". Where would be a good place to put this list so people who
> have a problem with their translations will be most likely to
> encounter it?
Dep
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:53 AM, David Cramer wrote:
> One of the recent changes in trunk was a change to how querysets were
> cloned. Due to this, some old code we had is no longer working. This
> was a custom aggregate which relied on "aggregate_select" (see below).
> I believe the change I'm re
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:55 PM, jrs wrote:
> I have a statement---
>
> Container.objects.get(
> pk=container_id
> ).delete()
>
> This seemingly trivial operation hammers the db with 581 queries!!
> The reason being that the django orm has decided that it will enforce
> referential i
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:21 PM, jrs wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 23, 10:05 am, "ge...@aquarianhouse.com"
> wrote:
>> Filter would be better :)
>>
>> Container.objects.filter(
>> pk=container_id
>> ).delete()
>
> Why is filter better here, since it's a one record delete?
It isn't.
> Also
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:04 PM, jrs wrote:
> Thanks Russ
>
> On Mar 23, 10:33 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:21 PM, jrs wrote:
>>
>> > On Mar 23, 10:05 am, "ge...@aquarianhouse.com"
>> > wrote:
>> >
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Phlip wrote:
> Djangoists:
>
> Suppose I want a test to fail if the database would respond to a given
> QuerySet without using my favorite index.
>
> This test case would attempt, at developer test time, to solve the
> same problem as a "soak test" would, at accept
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:01 AM, jrs wrote:
> Thanks Preston.
>
> I'm not using django's messaging... at all. My problem is that for
> every ajax request, the query-
>
> {'time': '0.000', 'sql': u'SELECT `auth_message`.`id`,
> `auth_message`.`user_id`, `auth_message`.`message` FROM `auth_message`
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:22 AM, jrs wrote:
> Another great example... If PostgreSQL has referential integrity on by
> default, is django still hammering the db with unnecessary queries?
In this case, for two reasons - MySQL, and generic foreign keys.
Fisrtly, we aim to guarantee consistent beha
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:35 AM, jrs wrote:
> Clifford,
>
> Ask the previous engineering staff of Twitter if it's dangerous.
When you're using the wrong shovel to hammer in a screw, you don't
blame the shovel.
Yours,
Russ Magee %-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Henrik Genssen
wrote:
> No one any comment on this?
> is this the expected behavior?
...
>>Now is there a way to force select_related tables any way in a count?
select_related() is an optimization for data retrieval. It allows you
to expand a select row to include
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Henrik Genssen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your answer!
>
Now is there a way to force select_related tables any way in a count?
>>
>>select_related() is an optimization for data retrieval. It allows you
>>to expand a select row to include related objects in a s
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:16 PM, jrs wrote:
> I'm using 1.1.1 now. Any idea when there will be a 1.1.2 release? Is
> the current branch considered stable?
1.1.2 will be released at the same time as 1.2; current estimate is mid April.
We only ever backport bugfixes from trunk to the stable bran
2010/3/24 Filip Gruszczyński :
> When I run all tests, tests for django.contrib.auth. I tried googling
> it and found information, that django.contrib.sites is required, but I
> have this app installed. I was also advised to use
> TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_LOADERS, but this didn't help. Have anyone
> encoun
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:16 PM, mbdtsmh
wrote:
> Hi All, still trying to get my head around the multi db stuff in 1.2
> release.
>
> Here is my problem that I have hit upon.
>
> I have a model in my default db...
>
> class Set1(models.Model):
> create_date = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add='
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Continuation wrote:
> I have 2 models: A, B
>
> I need a form that inserts/updates both fields of A and fields of B.
>
> Is there any way to create a ModelForm tied to A & B? Or do I need to
> use the plain old Form?
Why not just use two forms? There's no limitati
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:54 PM, greatlemer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running the django 1.2 beta and am testing out the multi-db
> system. Unfortunately I have run into an issue where I have:
>
> class A(models.Model):
> name = models.CharField()
>
>
> class B(models.Model):
> a = models.F
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Bjunix wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for tests for the flatpages app. I can't find any. Do I
> miss something or ships django without tests for flatpages?
You're not missing anything; for historical reasons (specifically,
that flatpages was written before Djan
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Ben Gerdemann wrote:
> I found the Django documentation about testing E-mail services
> confusing. It says here
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.1/topics/testing/#e-mail-services
> "Django's test runner automatically redirects all Django-sent e-mail
> to a du
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:12 PM, nih wrote:
> One of the files modified in django rev #12866 has broken mod_wsgi for
> me, the web app loads perfectly ok in rev #12865, the apache mod_wsgi
> log when using django rev #12866 has:
>
...
> none of the changed files in rev #12866 look like they have
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:40 AM, nih wrote:
> oops sorry, typo in the last paragraph :(
>
> It only crashes for me with apache, mod_wsgi, new project (no views/
> models/etc), finished project, and rev # 12866+.
>
> They all work normally with the dev server and rev # 12866+, so that
> pretty muc
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Django Grappelli
wrote:
> hi everyone,
> quick question:
> is it possible to download the django docs in html somewhere so that i don't
> have to use the rest text ones when i'm developing offline?
No, but if you install sphinx (pip install sphinx), you can compil
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
> Can someone kindly tell me how I can detect which subversion revision of
> Django is actually installed on my machine?
>
> I need to re-install the exact same revision on another platform.
>
> It is probably staring me in the face but I must
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Colin wrote:
> After struggling with Django's templating language for a while, I
> decided I wanted to switch to something with a bit more power. In
> particular, I liked what I saw of Mako (being able to instantiate new
> variables, and write functions for subrou
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Phlip wrote:
>> qs.query.get_compiler(qs.db).as_sql()
>
> That gives this error message with the usual zero Google hits for that
> error message:
>
> AttributeError: 'BaseQuery' object has no attribute 'get_compiler'
Sorry - a point of clarification. the techniq
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:28 AM, xin wrote:
> I am unsure if this a bug in Django, or django-multidb-router, or
> something I've done wrong.
>
> I'm using django-multidb-router from here:
> http://github.com/jbalogh/django-multidb-router
> With two database definitions, a read_only_user and a rea
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:16 AM, wchildsuk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the django app, django-schedule (http://github.com/thauber/
> django-schedule) and am adding an additional table to map users to
> calendars (see line 253 on dpaste). When I run syncdb it completely
> ignores my table and doesn'
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Wiiboy wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I've gotten two emails from "Mail Delivery Subsystem
> " with the subject "Your message was NOT
> received by django-us...@googlegroups.com!".
> The body is below. Anyone know why I'm getting these? Is anyone else
> getting them? I ha
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Wiiboy wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I've gotten two emails from "Mail Delivery Subsystem
>> " with the subject "Your message was NOT
>> received by django
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, zweb wrote:
> after some debugging, just found out that
> filter method does not throw DoesNotExist while get does.
get() returns a single object. If a single object does not exist, you
get a DoesNotExist exception. This is documented:
http://docs.djangoproject.c
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Brian Neal wrote:
> I am on trunk, somewhere around revision 127xx and just updated to
> 12936. A couple of my views render this one particular template, which
> used to take less than a second to see a response. Now it is taking
> almost a minute. The Django debug
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Victor Hooi wrote:
> heya,
>
> This is a bit of random musing, but I was wondering, how big a project
> is it to write a DB adapter for the Client-side Client-side Database
> Storage API in HTML5?
>
> That is, there are already efforts to integrate in things like Co
701 - 800 of 2540 matches
Mail list logo
