u'margie.rogin...@gmail.com'
I thought this is supposed to be a case sensitive operation - am I
missing something here? I'm running with the 1.1 final release.
Thanks,
Margie Roginski
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django
Ah yes - I am using mysql. Thanks for that pointer.
Margie
On Mar 10, 1:34 pm, Karen Tracey wrote:
> Are you using MySQL? See the note about MySQL here:
>
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/querysets/#exact
>
> Karen
--
You received this message because you ar
I implement read-only fields by using widgets that render html that
does not include any . For example, if I have a field called
hobby in a Customer model, in my form I have something like this:
self.fields["hobby"] = CharField(widget=DisplayHobbyField(customer),
required=False)
DisplayHobbyFie
one-js-and-fullcalendar-a-step-by-step-tutorial/
but honestly, I'll do best to start with a working repo (events,
calendar, address mapping)
(It makes me wonder if anyone has wrapped up a whole bunch of sample django
apps, for easy reuse in general.)
Margie
--
http://FarmBillPrimer.
I'm late back to this thread, but Tito, thank you! I have a "dumb" (or
basic) question. Looks like events can be dragged and dropped. Is that true
for the end-user as well?
--
http://FarmBillPrimer.org
http://www.BaltimoreUrbanAg.org (Please send events; This site is hungry.)
http://www.ExcellentN
with django 1.2.?
Or maybe the changes between 1.1 and 1.2 are just very minor? I see
something about "class based test runners" in the doc. I haven't
really had a chance to dive in yet, but just thought I'd ask if you
have any updates you'd be willing to provide.
Thanks,
ork much, so I am looking forward to
learning from your book.
Thanks!
Margie
On Apr 29, 4:40 am, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Margie Roginski
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have a bit of time on my hands and was going to run through your
> > book to
lient (ie, runserver) - is
that possible?
Thanks for any pointers,
Margie
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email t
, but what do I call from that point to create the
mydata.json file that then gets loaded with the command
django-admin.py testserver mydata.json
Thanks!
Margie
On May 29, 7:28 pm, Jason Culverhouse wrote:
> On May 29, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Margie Roginski wrote:
>
> > Anyone kno
is no more standard way of dumping the
database from inside a test so that the state can be replicated for
use in a runserver environment.
Margie
On Jun 1, 2:01 pm, Kirill Spitsin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:59:28AM -0700, Margie Roginski wrote:
> > That's a good pointer, th
test from the web interface, but in reality, now that I am off and
running writing tests, I guess I haven't ended up needing it after
all ...
In any case, thanks for your response.
Margie
On Jun 4, 5:47 am, Karen Tracey wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Margie Roginski
> wr
so perhaps it is overkill to enable this just for these
tooltips. Perhaps I should just be using a custom solution, or
perhaps there is something more standard that folks are using?
Anyone with some experience in this area that can comment?
Much appreciated,
Margie
--
You received this message b
y understanding is correct? Should I
simply not be using select_related in this situation? Is it primarily
intended for use from views.py, where you have more control over
exactly how and when you reference the attributes of a model
instance? Or is there some better way I could be making use o
name set to foo.
Task.objects.filter(Q()) gives me that one object:
[]
But:
Task.objects.filter(Q()|Q(name="bar"))
returns []
Is this a bug or am I misunderstanding something? This is on Django
1.2.1
Thanks for any pointers,
Margie
--
You received this message because you are su
person.memberships.filter(group_name="beatles")
[0].date_joined
Thanks for any pointers,
Margie
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
easy to get all membership info for a given
group, but I'm guessing that my original solution is the appropriate
solution for getting the join date for just a single person?
Margie
On Feb 16, 2:05 am, Daniel Roseman wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:36:49 AM UTC, Margie Roginski wrot
Ah yes, that is *much* better. Thank you! Sorry for the delay,
forgot to check back on this thread till now.
Margie
On Feb 17, 2:28 pm, Daniel Roseman wrote:
> On Thursday, February 17, 2011 10:06:40 PM UTC, Margie Roginski wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your reply, Daniel. I didn'
resulting queues withthe total number of open tasks (I
think).
Can anyone give me a hand? Thank you!
Margie
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To u
Ah, right - so obvious! I'm not sure why it didn't occur to me to
filter first, then annotate. Thank you!
On Mar 15, 2:43 am, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Margie Roginski
>
> wrote:
> > class Queue(models.Model):
> > # fields here, n
umber of closed tasks. Perhaps there is some other
approach that I am missing ...
Margie
On Mar 15, 2:43 am, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:57 PM,MargieRoginski
>
> wrote:
> > class Queue(models.Model):
> > # fields here, not relevant for this d
aceback (most recent call
last)
/home/mlevine/django/chipvision74/chip_vision_2/ in
()
AttributeError: 'Queue' object has no attribute 'num_tasks_closed'
Margie
On Mar 16, 9:13 am, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Margie Roginski
>
> wrote:
>
e agree that being able to google and
then adapt things is very important. But this is a common need so it
seems worthwhile to post it explicitly to help the django community.
Margie
On Mar 16, 11:49 am, Shawn Milochik wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:47 PM, emonk wrote:
> > I'm ti
Hi developers - your review would be appreciated here!
It seems to me, based on my experimentation, that if I have an
intermediary model that has a many-to-many relationship from the model
to itself, that the order of the two fields that point back to the
model is important. For example:
class T
201 - 223 of 223 matches
Mail list logo