I would use a HTTP sniffer and check what is normally send( from a
browser).Then I would try to do the same with Django
Regards,
L.
I found that any field with primary_key=True leads to a field name with
_id appended. So your field will look like user_id_id in the database.
Try dropping the '_id' suffix perhaps?
On 12/13/05, PythonistL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would use a HTTP sniffer and check what is normally send( from a
> browser).Then I would try to do the same with Django
If you use Firefox check out the LiveHTTPHeaders or Tamper Data
extensions. These allow you to view the HTTP headers and
On 12/13/05, Fat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I add a FieldPathFiled in my code
> fp = meta.FilePathField(path="c:/windows", match="*.gif", recursive=True)
> but in admin mode , I got error message.
>
> .
> File "C:\Python24\lib\pprint.py", line 291, in _safe_repr
> rep = repr(object)
>
>
coming from ROR where it's easy to cache partials (parts of templates)
I couldn't find a way to cache just parts of my template easily without
going back to the cache low level API.
What's the suggested strategy for caching for example the home page
which will be hit lots of times, in case where
so how would you hook Mygthy to Django ?
I tried Django for creating a "configuration application". It seemed
pretty cool and reduced a lot of my work. I felt frustrated once ,
while creating two apps under one project , probably I missed few
obvious settings.
I tried creating two apps under 1 project.
This is what I assumed,
Django by
Hello tonemcd!
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:27:30 - you wrote:
>
> I found that any field with primary_key=True leads to a field name
> with _id appended. So your field will look like user_id_id in the
> database.
>
> Try dropping the '_id' suffix perhaps?
>
Nop,
Traceback (most recent call las
i just wanted to create a new app using
django-admin.py startapp manage
and i get the error
ImportError: No module named django.core
by the way, i already created an app last week, which worked fine.
patrick
On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:43 PM, patrick kranzlmüller wrote:
i just wanted to create a new app using
django-admin.py startapp manage
and i get the error
ImportError: No module named django.core
by the way, i already created an app last week, which worked fine.
patrick
This is due to old *.py
I am trying to model a category entity which has parent-child
structure. My model is:
class Category(meta.Model):
parent = meta.ForeignKey(Tag, related_name="parent_category")
child = meta.ForeignKey(Tag, related_name="child_category")
class META:
admin
On 12/13/05, Cheng Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to model a category entity which has parent-child
> structure. My model is:
...
> If parent is as same as child, this is considered as top-level
Maybe just use "parent == None" condition?
And child field. as ForeignKey... Your pare
On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:43 PM, patrick kranzlmüller wrote:
i just wanted to create a new app using
django-admin.py startapp manage
and i get the error
ImportError: No module named django.core
by the way, i already created an app last week, which worked fine.
patrick
This is due to old *.py
[patrick]
> ImportError: No module named django.core
By a weird coincidence I hit this just last night, and eventually worked out
that it was because I'd added a source file called "site.py". (My site.py
was being imported in place of Python's own site.py, which is partly
responsible for settin
[patrick]
ImportError: No module named django.core
By a weird coincidence I hit this just last night, and eventually
worked out
that it was because I'd added a source file called "site.py". (My
site.py
was being imported in place of Python's own site.py, which is partly
responsible for se
Hi there,
are there any plans on providing something like a save_or_update()
method for model objects?
I haven't found any ticket or other information regarding this.
Maybe this is considered bad practice, but then I would be very
interested to know why, if it's the case.
Thanks for your help
Be
I've made a short screencast which introduces some of Django's key
concepts:
http://www.throwingbeans.org/django_screencasts.html
It's intended as a demonstration, rather than a tutorial, and in the
course of building a simple CMS in seven minutes, it covers quite a lot
of ground.
I'd be gratef
On 13 Dec 2005, at 17:18, Tom Dyson wrote:
http://www.throwingbeans.org/django_screencasts.html
+32,768
Nice work!
Afternoon, man about the Internet -- http://aftnn.org/
I thought the music was an especially nice touch.
On 12/13/05, Tom Dyson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, I can upload differently encoded versions fairly
> promptly, if H.264 is a problem for too many people.
I've still got QT 6, due to hair-brained corporate content filtering.
But I imagine I'm the exception, not the rule.
Really nice Tom, hope you can make some more of these.
On 12/13/05, Tom Dyson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've made a short screencast which introduces some of Django's keyconcepts:Great first step!1) the musical background is a very nice touch.2) in the interactive shell session, I first had the impression because it went by fast that accessing the dat
I don't know that one would want to hook them together -- I just
thought if the OP wanted to develop in a similar style to Mason but
using Python, Myghty would be the obvious path to take.
Myghty has lots of parts, which might be usable with other frameworks,
I honestly don't know it well enough
Great!
Shame we're going to break the apis ;-)
So a couple of points -
* the app template loader would probably have seemed less tedious than
the full path thing. Ie just 'templates' in the app directory.
Things that might be worth showing in a slightly longer screencast:
Templates:
* T
Jeremy Dunck wrote:
On 12/13/05, Tom Dyson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the other hand, I can upload differently encoded versions fairly
promptly, if H.264 is a problem for too many people.
I've still got QT 6, due to hair-brained corporate content filtering.
But I imagine I'm the exception
ashutux wrote:
> I tried creating two apps under 1 project.
> ...
> Now,I tried calling a template named "login.html" from second apps'
> view (second in the sense it was written at second position in
> "INSTALLED_APPS" ) but since "login.html" was also present under
> templates directory of first
Nicely done. Really nice actually.
Now since you asked for feedback:
Perhaps 8 1/2 minutes would have been better as some of the operations
toward the end flew by too quickly to easily comprehend. (I know the
show seems slow to the producer who knows the content well, but the
first time viewer
Tom Dyson wrote:
I've made a short screencast which introduces some of Django's key
concepts:
http://www.throwingbeans.org/django_screencasts.html
It's intended as a demonstration, rather than a tutorial, and in the
course of building a simple CMS in seven minutes, it covers quite a lot
of gro
On 12/13/05, Robert Wittams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So a couple of points -
The screencast is great. Tom, thanks for taking the time to make it!
Here are a few other things, in addition to what Robert said, that
could go in the next iteration of the screencast --
* Use the brand-new (and u
On 13 Dec 2005, at 19:29, Rock wrote:
At the very beginning it would be nice to know the precise state of
things. (I presume that Django was installed but completely
uninitialized, but it would have been nice to be more explicit about
that and perhaps to point out which operations were "one ti
I was reading
http://www.loudthinking.com/arc/000545.html
and it has an emphasis on Ruby's "beauty", and parsimony, as
demonstrated by the code excerpt (David: "I was more surprised to learn
that someone would actually prefer something like"):
class Project(meta.Model):
project_manager = meta
"Django" is pronounced correctly in the screencast.
As a somewhat burned-out old-time Zope user, Django looks like nirvana
for my needs (fairly simple: mostly static "brochureware" web site,
plus blog, plus discussion groups, and, eventually, a simple customer
database with customer assets and an integrated online store).
>From investigating for a
Wrong I think. There are already several Djangoids looking at making a
discussion forum together as an open project. I expect there will be
plenty of similar activities.
The problem is that Django is changing fast right now without regards
to backwards compatability. Wait until 1.0 hits and soon
On Dec 13, 2005, at 3:58 PM, Rock wrote:
Wrong I think. There are already several Djangoids looking at making a
discussion forum together as an open project. I expect there will be
plenty of similar activities.
Yes.
The major thrust after 1.0 will be to build up a "standard Django
library"
personally I'm all for ease of use, and multiple versions of things,
and I'm REALLY happy if it is easy for someone to go and write their
own blog software.
for example.. I've been slowly getting a phpBB-like forum software up
and running for my own uses. and was planning to 'announce/release'
ne
Tom Dyson wrote:
I've made a short screencast which introduces some of Django's key
concepts:
http://www.throwingbeans.org/django_screencasts.html
btw. isn't it funny, that virtually all web-app screencasts (ruby on
rails, turbogears, django) are done on mac osx? :)
i sometimes wonder if
"Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> (Simon has cool ideas about one-click installs of these apps...)
Could Simon or you share them with us?
Thanks,
Eugene
Alexy,
although I am not Adrian, I still felt compelled to comment. :)
On 12/13/05, braver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> class Project(meta.Model):
> project_manager = meta.ForeignKey(ProjectManager)
> milestones = meta.OneToOneField(Milestone)
> categories = meta.ManyToManyField(Category)
>
Hi Ian,
On 12/13/05, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - captcha (text or images based)
> - spam and XSS protection
Have you seen/read http://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/ already?
Especially the automated circumvention of CAPTCHAs is very
interesting.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asm
On 12/13/05, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> btw. isn't it funny, that virtually all web-app screencasts (ruby on
> rails, turbogears, django) are done on mac osx? :)
>
> i sometimes wonder if this also means that the majority of the
> users/devels use macs...
It's been the case for a w
it is more about raising the bar and making it more time consuming
than the other guys ;-)
but yeah..hugo already told me to use text-based captcha (and he has
implemented a version of it I think which uses a set of questions that
the human needs to answer.
oh.. the link reminded me of another i
On 12/13/05, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The major thrust after 1.0 will be to build up a "standard Django
> library" of apps so that it's trivial to install a blog app, or a
> discussion forum, or a wiki, or... Part of this process will indeed
> be to figure out the best pract
On 12/13/05, braver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and it has an emphasis on Ruby's "beauty", and parsimony, as
> demonstrated by the code excerpt (David: "I was more surprised to learn
> that someone would actually prefer something like"):
Except David glosses over an awful lot in that example; be
"Gabor Farkas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> btw. isn't it funny, that virtually all web-app screencasts (ruby on
> rails, turbogears, django) are done on mac osx? :)
Because it looks good. Admit it.
> i sometimes wonder if this also means that the majority of
On 13 Dec 2005, at 22:23, Ian Holsman wrote:
captcha (text or images based)
Working on an image based system right now as it happens :-). It's an
implementation of the captchas.net stuff for Django. Really simple
but enough to prevent the blight of comment spam I've been getting I
hope
On 12/13/05, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would be very cool... I'd been looking at the idea of writing
> things like standardized store components (views that could hook into
> things like the Paypal direct payment API, etc.), and it's be neat to
> have a way to distribute thos
On 13 Dec 2005, at 23:59, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
Of course, once we get an app repository, the distinction between what
goes in contrib and what goes in the app repository, becomes even more
subjective.
Agreed, but in the meantime, I think it's great to stick it all in
there. It's a great
On Dec 13, 2005, at 10:53 PM, Alex Bondarenko wrote:
On 12/13/05, Cheng Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to model a category entity which has parent-child
structure. My model is:
...
If parent is as same as child, this is considered as top-level
Maybe just use "parent == None"
OK, can someone please explain to a pythonista what exactly does a
phrase like
has_many :milestones
mean, and what in python prevents us from mimicking it more closely?
On 12/13/05, braver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, can someone please explain to a pythonista what exactly does a
> phrase like
>
> has_many :milestones
>
> mean, and what in python prevents us from mimicking it more closely?
It's expressing a many-to-many or many-to-one relationship. For
examp
Um, I guess I wonder what it "means" in terms of syntactic sugar -- the
semantics is clear, and that's the claimed ruby's hallmark. I don't
yet have a handle on those "symbol" things like :poll ("they're like
strings" --huh?), and what's belongs_to? I wonder what would be the
closest pythonic sy
kmh wrote:
> No. Rather, the convention is to put application specific templates in
> a subdirectory of the application templates folder with the same name
> as the application. That way you can refer to 'app1/login' and
> 'app2/login'. See:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/DosAndDontsFor
Now that my appetite is whetted by the cris-py fresh Object-Relational
Managers, I keep collecting and comparing them. So far I've found that
ruby's ActiveRecord is separable from RoR, and I found SQLobject.org, a
totally pythonic ORM (but no cigar... i.e., web). So it begs the
question -- what
On 12/13/05, braver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Um, I guess I wonder what it "means" in terms of syntactic sugar -- the
> semantics is clear, and that's the claimed ruby's hallmark. I don't
> yet have a handle on those "symbol" things like :poll ("they're like
> strings" --huh?), and what's be
ashutux wrote:
> I find it a bit unconventional though.. Why have a separate apps_name
> ("apps1" for example) directory under template directory of the same
> app, since those templates are anyways going to be used by the only
> app?
> Has this convention appeared just because the way django code
56 matches
Mail list logo
