On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:22 AM, TheIvIaxx wrote:
> I will just have a cron job populate memcached separately.
>
> Is this a common practice or is there a better method for this?
I think the overall approach might need a little more thought, but if
you end up doing something like this, incron wo
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:52 PM, TheIvIaxx wrote:
> Its a lot of little files and from what i've seen, the stat call is a
> bottleneck. If they are all in memcache, then it should scream.
yes, this sounds like memcached territory. still, we can argue all
we want but a little benchmark would t
Its a lot of little files and from what i've seen, the stat call is a
bottleneck. If they are all in memcache, then it should scream.
Which "hints" would you be referring?
On Jun 18, 10:56 am, Javier Guerra Giraldez
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:22 PM, TheIvIaxx wrote:
> > My thoughts ri
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:22 PM, TheIvIaxx wrote:
> My thoughts right now are for it to check memcached for the key, if
> not found, then serve up the file from disk. Everything else goes to
> apache. I will just have a cron job populate memcached separately.
>
> Is this a common practice or is
This probably isnt the *best* place to post this, but I figured a lot
of folks here have had experience with this.
I am switching off lighty to nginx for static file serving as it
handles memcached (as far as i know, lighty does not). Anyhow, I have
it up and running ok, but im not sure what the
5 matches
Mail list logo
