Re: multi-auth branch

exactly, thanx english isn't my first language, sorry. Perhaps we'll have group and user ldap storage? :) On 5/16/06, gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Joseph Kocherhans wrote: > > On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> the

Re: multi-auth branch

On 5/16/06, gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Joseph Kocherhans wrote: > > On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> the multi-auth branch targets some kind of 100% external auth? because > >> i've seen some approach using ldap+

Re: multi-auth branch

Joseph Kocherhans wrote: > On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> the multi-auth branch targets some kind of 100% external auth? because >> i've seen some approach using ldap+django users > > I'm not sure what you mean by "100% exte

Re: multi-auth branch

On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the multi-auth branch targets some kind of 100% external auth? because > i've seen some approach using ldap+django users I'm not sure what you mean by "100% external" but the backends tha

Re: multi-auth branch

the multi-auth branch targets some kind of 100% external auth? because i've seen some approach using ldap+django users On 5/16/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone have news ab

Re: multi-auth branch

On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone have news about it? progress, etc The implementation is pretty much finished and committed. I have most of the docs written, but I still need to review and commit them. Someone has already written an LDAP backend and posted it

multi-auth branch

Does anyone have news about it? progress, etc thnx Douglas --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from