Re: mod_python-3.2.10/Apache-2.2.2/FreeBSD/

2006-09-01 Thread Wiktor Grębla
Ivan Sagalaev napisał(a): >> I have lighttpd+fastcgi configuration on the same host, but apache + >> mod_python looked like a good idea (for a change). >> > > Interesting I've just made as switch in other direction :-). > Lighty+FastCGI just takes less memory... If it was up to me, I'd ha

Re: mod_python-3.2.10/Apache-2.2.2/FreeBSD/

2006-09-01 Thread dt
Last time I tried Apache-2.2 with mod_python 3.x and it didn't work for me. I degraded to apache2.0 and now everything works. I am using Freebsd 6.1. There was a known problem about 3 months ago, maybe it's fixed now, in which case you need to update your ports (advise using portsnap for this) an

Re: mod_python-3.2.10/Apache-2.2.2/FreeBSD/

2006-08-31 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
Wiktor Grębla wrote: > I have lighttpd+fastcgi configuration on the same host, but apache + > mod_python looked like a good idea (for a change). Interesting I've just made as switch in other direction :-). Lighty+FastCGI just takes less memory... --~--~-~--~~~---~--

Re: mod_python-3.2.10/Apache-2.2.2/FreeBSD/

2006-08-30 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 31-Aug-06, at 12:52 AM, James Bennett wrote: > Also, I've heard about weird things with mod_python on FreeBSD (my > hosting provider is currently on FreeBSD and doesn't offer mod_python > because of problems they ran into with it). i have been using mod_python on freeBSD for nearly a year wi

Re: mod_python-3.2.10/Apache-2.2.2/FreeBSD/

2006-08-30 Thread Wiktor Grębla
Ivan Sagalaev napisał(a): > I also have a FreeBSD machine with Apache 2.2 but never tried to install > mod_python since for the time being it did only support officially > Apache 2.0. That's why I went with FastCGI server instead. Any reason > why you do want mod_python? > I have lighttpd+f

Re: mod_python-3.2.10/Apache-2.2.2/FreeBSD/

2006-08-30 Thread Wiktor Grębla
James Bennett napisał(a): >> >> Have you double-checked that you're not running into one of the problems >> here? >> http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/modpython/#if-you-get-a-segmentation-fault >> Yup. Point number 2. Lesson taken, but what a waste of time :). (honestly speaking:

Re: mod_python-3.2.10/Apache-2.2.2/FreeBSD/

2006-08-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I currently have Apache 2.2.3, Mod_python 3.2.10, and FreeBSD 6.1 (with all current patches) running on a production server and haven't had any problems. There are so many variables, without being much closer to the problem, I can't give much advice other than my server is working as it should.

Re: mod_python-3.2.10/Apache-2.2.2/FreeBSD/

2006-08-30 Thread James Bennett
On 8/30/06, Wiktor Grêbla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately I'm not the admin of this machine, so I'm a bit restricted > in what I can do. The most general question comes to mind: do you have > similar working configuration? Have you double-checked that you're not running into one of the

Re: mod_python-3.2.10/Apache-2.2.2/FreeBSD/

2006-08-30 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
Wiktor Grębla wrote: > Unfortunately I'm not the admin of this machine, so I'm a bit restricted > in what I can do. The most general question comes to mind: do you have > similar working configuration? I also have a FreeBSD machine with Apache 2.2 but never tried to install mod_python since fo

mod_python-3.2.10/Apache-2.2.2/FreeBSD/

2006-08-30 Thread Wiktor Grębla
I know, another boring configuration question. Most of you probably prefer to do some python coding, but... I'm obsessive and it's not easy to ignore that something as cool as django does not work for me :). Shortly speaking, it dies :). Internal server error, nothing more specific, despite of