Jarek Zgoda wrote:
> I second that. Actual code may vary, but domain model (and its
> representation as Django data model) would remain constant, as long as
> software will be performing similar tasks.
Well, maybe. I think its really hard in any real application to have a
one-size-fits-all data
Guillermo Fernandez Castellanos wrote:
> I've been following the discussion with interest. I've seen that many
> of you have concentrated on the actual code. But something I would
> find also helpful/interesting is a "standard" model of blog. Or, to
> push the idea further, a djangoforge of model
Hi,
I've been following the discussion with interest. I've seen that many
of you have concentrated on the actual code. But something I would
find also helpful/interesting is a "standard" model of blog. Or, to
push the idea further, a djangoforge of models.
Often, the model is one of the parts th
On 31/05/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/2006, at 3:30 AM, Bryan Murdock wrote:
>
> >
> > Just an aside in response to the request that the blog writers all get
> > together and not waste resources, take a look at the code they are
> > writing. Actually, take a look at t
On 01/06/2006, at 3:30 AM, Bryan Murdock wrote:
>
> Just an aside in response to the request that the blog writers all get
> together and not waste resources, take a look at the code they are
> writing. Actually, take a look at the code they are not writing. A
> basic django blog app can be do
agreed -- I am not doing much from scratch. I am new to using web
frameworks (I'm just a project manager who likes to dabble in
design/code so I can better understand what the Dev/Creative teams go
through) and I'm pretty much using generic views to get my feet wet
with how Django works on a highe
On 5/30/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/29/06, Bryan Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The code for the djangoproject.com blog is open source:
> >
> > http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/djangoproject.com
> >
> > Looks like it hasn't been ported to magic removal eith
On 5/29/06, Bryan Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code for the djangoproject.com blog is open source:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/djangoproject.com
>
> Looks like it hasn't been ported to magic removal either. :-(
As of today, it has indeed been ported to magic-removal.
A
This list rocks!
Thank you all for providing your code for us to take a look at. I've
finally gotten Django working on my Powerbook and CentOS box and am in
the process of writing a portfolio/blog app to get more acquainted
with how the framework works. Being able to see how others approach
thing
would it make sense for you 4-5 blog writers to join up together and
write up a common blog app?
it seems like such a waste of resources for all of you.
On 31/05/2006, at 6:40 AM, wam wrote:
>
> I've recently been updating my site to be entirely django powered. As
> others have done, I applied
I've recently been updating my site to be entirely django powered. As
others have done, I applied the 'Fixing the Magic' document to Ross
Poulton's blog tutorial and have applied some of my own tweaks as well.
So far I am fairly happy with the result. Source code is at
https://svn.wamber.net/proje
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:48:11AM +0200, Giovanni Giorgi wrote:
> I am planning to build a small personal web site.
> I have used Plone CMS (Zope powered) but it is very slow and requires
> a lot of memory.
I'm coming from a similar camp. I've had a blog running on Zope with
COREBlog for about
On 5/29/06, Konstantin Shaposhnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Do not count this post as self promotion but you can also check my
> personal site :) Here is how it looks like:
>http://step-inside.org
> And here you can browse sources:
>http://step-inside.org/projects/stepinsid
Hello,
Do not count this post as self promotion but you can also check my
personal site :) Here is how it looks like:
http://step-inside.org
And here you can browse sources:
http://step-inside.org/projects/stepinside/browser/trunk
Though it is not ported to the latest version (post magic-re
Another is:
http://socialistsoftware.com/ and here you can find the source
http://source.socialistsoftware.com/sssource/
ciao ciao
Patrick
>
> Possibly the quickest blog to get up and running is by Ross Poulton -
> http://www.rossp.org/ - his code has not had the magic removed yet
> though...
>
>
Possibly the quickest blog to get up and running is by Ross Poulton -
http://www.rossp.org/ - his code has not had the magic removed yet
though...
Paul Bissex - http://e-scribe.com/news/171 - has done a *very* small
Wiki implementation.
Cheers,
Tone
--~--~-~--~~~---
Hi all,
I am planning to build a small personal web site.
I have used Plone CMS (Zope powered) but it is very slow and requires
a lot of memory.
There is some django application for building small blogs or wiki?
I will eventually plan to do something like that if missed ;)
--
Software Architect
17 matches
Mail list logo
