Re: delete(), cascade, and the case of the missing data

Yea, I was afraid that was it, just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something silly/obvious. I need to put some code out the door tomorrow, which is why I asked now instead of just waiting for transactions to go in; I guess it won't hurt too much to quickly patch the relevant method

Re: delete(), cascade, and the case of the missing data

There really is no sensible way around the requirement for transactions, unless you want to check every constraint yourself. It is planned to go in before 0.91, AFAIK.