Yea, I was afraid that was it, just wanted to make sure I wasn't
missing something silly/obvious.
I need to put some code out the door tomorrow, which is why I asked
now instead of just waiting for transactions to go in; I guess it
won't hurt too much to quickly patch the relevant method in core/meta/
__init__ (or something) and then update the code later after
transactions come out.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Dec 5, 2005, at 8:12 PM, Robert Wittams wrote:
There really is no sensible way around the requirement for
transactions,
unless you want to check every constraint yourself.
It is planned to go in before 0.91, AFAIK.
--
Jeffrey E. Forcier
Junior Developer, Research and Development
Stroz Friedberg, LLC
15 Maiden Lane, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10038
[main]212-981-6540 [direct]212-981-6546
http://www.strozllc.com
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No right to
confidential or privileged treatment of this message is waived or lost
by any error in transmission. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail or by telephone at
212.981.6540, delete the message and all copies from your system and
destroy any hard copies. You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
disclose, distribute, print or copy any part of this message if you are
not the intended recipient.
