Hey bro,
i try to combine two model forms in single view django views
but i dnt knw how to work with this please check my below code and help me!
On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 11:15:29 PM UTC+5:30 Kasper Laudrup wrote:
> On 31/05/2021 18.46, Hugh Frost wrote:
> > Hii all,
> > I hv been struck in
On 31/05/2021 18.46, Hugh Frost wrote:
> Hii all,
> I hv been struck in last 4 days please fix this error , i'm new to django
>
Instead of telling people how many days you've spent trying to fix the
error, try spend some time on explaining what you've spent the days on
doing and what you're trying
You will need to login into the database admin page ( maybe pgadmin ) to
update the user_id . From your model, user_id can't be null
*AJAYI Sunday *
(+234) 806 771 5394
*sunnexaj...@gmail.com *
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:58 AM Dinolin yp job
wrote:
>
>
> It worked but the user_id in uploads_u
Good to know..
Cheers!
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 7:21 AM Dinolin yp job
wrote:
> Thanks a lot @obastephen it worked.
>
> On Friday, July 31, 2020 at 12:32:47 AM UTC+5:30 obast...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> irst in your UploadSerializer fields use fields = "__all__"
>>
>> Then you can use this in your
Thanks a lot @obastephen it worked.
On Friday, July 31, 2020 at 12:32:47 AM UTC+5:30 obast...@gmail.com wrote:
> irst in your UploadSerializer fields use fields = "__all__"
>
> Then you can use this in your views:
>
> *def post(self, **request, format=None**):*
> *upload_file = request.da
irst in your UploadSerializer fields use fields = "__all__"
Then you can use this in your views:
*def post(self, **request, format=None**):*
*upload_file = request.data.get("upload_file"**)*
*upload_date = **request.data.get("upload_date"**)*
*user = request.user
first in your UploadSerializer fields use fields = "__all__"
Then you can use this in your views:
*def post(self, **request, format=None**):*
*upload_file = request.data.get("upload_file"**)*
*upload_date = **request.data.get("upload_date"**)*
*user = request.user
I don't have forms.py since I'm creating only the endpoints using rest
framework. I've done it earlier and it has worked but earlier the foreign
key was to refer the default User model but now I have customized User
model by extending AbstractBaseUser.
uploads/views.py
*class UploadView(
You can create an upload form with an Image field, then when saving the for
set the User field to request.user.
Do you have an UploadForm already in your forms.py? if yes, show me with
the view that handles.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:59 AM Dinolin yp job
wrote:
>
>
> It worked but user_id colu
It worked but user_id column in uploads_upload table is empty. How to solve
this issue?
On Thursday, July 30, 2020 at 3:31:21 PM UTC+5:30 obast...@gmail.com wrote:
> From the error, it states that you are trying to add an upload object to
> the database without a user. And from your model.py,
It worked but the user_id in uploads_upload is empty. How can I can make
that work?
On Thursday, July 30, 2020 at 3:31:21 PM UTC+5:30 obast...@gmail.com wrote:
> From the error, it states that you are trying to add an upload object to
> the database without a user. And from your model.py, the
>From the error, it states that you are trying to add an upload object to
the database without a user. And from your model.py, the User foreign key
does not have a null=True, and blank=True. So you can't save a null value
for that user field.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:52 AM Dinolin yp job
wrote:
Thanks Samuel it worked
On Thu, May 28, 2020, 12:23 AM Samuel Nogueira wrote:
> In your Comment model you have a author field wich is a ForeignKey. The
> error is pointing exactly to that field, since it is a not null field. To
> overcome this you must pick the ID of the logged user and set the
Uh, am I not using the ORM? If I am not then what must I do to get back on
track?
I just realized that i didn't include the "Delete" CBV in my original
post. I do not have easy access to the code at the moment so what follows
is a rough approximation of what that code is about and is prolly f
Hello Anon,
Django doesn't use database level ON DELETE constraints and emulates them
in Python
to dispatch pre_delete/post_delete signals. As long as you're using the ORM
to perform
the deletion you shouldn't encounter constraint violations.
There's a ticket to add support for database level o
@James
As per my understanding I did following. Now it is not adding email if it
exists but also its not giving me any error.
class GuestCheckoutForm(forms.Form):
email = forms.EmailField()
email2 = forms.EmailField(label='Verify Email')
def clean_email(self):
email = self.c
@James
As per my understanding I did following. Now it is not adding email if it
exists but also its not giving me any error.
class GuestCheckoutForm(forms.Form):
email = forms.EmailField()
email2 = forms.EmailField(label='Verify Email')
def clean_email(self):
email = self.c
Thanks james for your kind response.
Intention is to set a single identifier for guest user account email. If
that email exists then user can login or if doesn't he will have to get
registered.
However let me implement your suggested code and I will respond you back.
Thanks again
--
You receiv
On Jul 2, 2016 7:23 AM, "M Hashmi" wrote:
>
> I am working on my Checkout view with regular/guest user but getting hard
time to come around the integrity error. Idea is to let guest users
register with email only to checkout and I need to set the user email
unique.
>
> models.py
>
> from django.co
Thanks Simon
Those definitions are the closest I can get to the original in terms of
type and relationship; what other info is needed?
That ticket refers to child models inline - not my situation.
Upgrading is on the cards - but still has to be budgeted for
Derek
On 23 June 2016 at 21:26,
Hi Derek,
It's hard to tell without your exact model admin definitions but I suspect
this
might be related to #25987[1] which is fixed in Django 1.10.
By the way you should at least upgrade to 1.8 as your Django version is
not supported anymore and you could be exposed to multiple security issue
You need to re-create your database.
Good way is to create a script that populates your DB with some test
data, and drop DB after a major change, or when something breaks, and
re-create it.
For now, you should try to create different DB (to preserve your data)
and do
python manage.py syncdb
i used
python manage.py sqlall
you're right sam, when i set null to true, it doesn't really change.
thank you so very much.
i'm a newbie with databases and i don't know what statements sould i use...
i don't know the syntax...
i would install south. thank you.
thank you so very much.
but i'm
Did you perhaps change the schema of the database after you had created it.
Eg: added null=True as a constraint after creating the table?
If so check the db sheme using:
python manage.py sqlall
It sounds simple enough. You will have to go into the db shell and update
your schema manually.
usin
Hi,
As long as I know, a model form needs the fields to be included in order to get
validation working, so I suspect you did something like this:
class ProxyForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = models.Myproxy
fields = ('name', )
Since stuff field is not included in the
This sound like a South kind of problem. Your tables were created with a
foreign key from django_admin_log to auth_user, but you’re not longer using
auth_user. You’ll have to drop the foreign key and recreate it to remove this
error.
On Feb 27, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Ben Roberts wrote:
> This ring
On 11/02/13 14:54, Bill Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Some Developer
mailto:someukdevelo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 10/02/13 15:07, Bill Freeman wrote:
Did you previously have a field named 'title' in this model that was
marked unique, that you have since
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Some Developer
wrote:
> On 10/02/13 15:07, Bill Freeman wrote:
>
>> Did you previously have a field named 'title' in this model that was
>> marked unique, that you have since removed? If so, the column may still
>> be in the database with a unique constraint. Si
On 10/02/13 15:07, Bill Freeman wrote:
Did you previously have a field named 'title' in this model that was
marked unique, that you have since removed? If so, the column may still
be in the database with a unique constraint. Since it's no longer in
the model, some default may be being used when
Did you previously have a field named 'title' in this model that was marked
unique, that you have since removed? If so, the column may still be in the
database with a unique constraint. Since it's no longer in the model, some
default may be being used when you save, and that's obviously not uniqu
On 08/02/13 14:08, Andre Terra wrote:
Please post traceback, settings.py, etc.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Some Developer
mailto:someukdevelo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have a model for a Tag object with simply has two fields. A title
(which has the unique constraint) and a description
On 08/02/13 14:08, Andre Terra wrote:
Please post traceback, settings.py, etc.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Some Developer
mailto:someukdevelo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have a model for a Tag object with simply has two fields. A title
(which has the unique constraint) and a description
Please post traceback, settings.py, etc.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Some Developer wrote:
> I have a model for a Tag object with simply has two fields. A title (which
> has the unique constraint) and a description. I also have a FormView based
> view class which handles the creation of Tag o
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Sandeep kaur wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Satinderpal Singh
> wrote:
>> I created a search box for searching the information about the client
>> so that this information uses to create the report.
>
> add these lines :
>
>> def search(request):
>
>>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Chris Cogdon wrote:
> Can you post the code for the model, and the complete exception trace?
class head(models.Model):
job = models.ForeignKey(Job, null=True)
Header_column_1 = models.CharField(max_length=255,blank=True)
Header_column_2 = models.CharF
I'd need to see the source for Job and that other model, plus a proper
exception traceback, so I can tell at what point the IntegrityError is
being thrown.
also, you should not be using form.save() there... if you do a commit=False
to get a copy of the model, you only need to save that model...
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Satinderpal Singh
wrote:
> I created a search box for searching the information about the client
> so that this information uses to create the report.
add these lines :
> def search(request):
> {% endfor %}
>
> i want to get job id to be saved through head
Can you post the code for the model, and the complete exception trace? I
ask you use something that will properly maintain the intending, such as
pastebin or dpaste.
On Monday, December 17, 2012 1:18:54 PM UTC-8, Satinderpal Singh wrote:
>
> I created a search box for searching the information a
.create() creates the object into DB, then .save(force_insert=True)
tries to insert the same object with the same ID again -> integrity
error. Seems like you don't need the second save at all.
- Anssi
On 27 syys, 15:39, Amyth Arora wrote:
> Not quite sure, but it seems like the save() method is
Not quite sure, but it seems like the save() method is being called twice
so it is trying to create insert an entry with a primary key that already
exists.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:23 PM, enemybass wrote:
> http://wklej.org/id/837631/ - models, traceback, urls, views, database
> structure
>
>
On Mar 28, 9:38 pm, Daniel Roseman wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 March 2012 20:31:09 UTC+1, laurence Turpin wrote:
>
> > I'm getting the following error with my registration section of my
> > program.
>
> > IntegrityError at /register/
> > auth_user.username may not be NULL
>
> > I am using django
On Wednesday, 28 March 2012 20:31:09 UTC+1, laurence Turpin wrote:
>
> I'm getting the following error with my registration section of my
> program.
>
> IntegrityError at /register/
> auth_user.username may not be NULL
>
> I am using django 1.3.1 and python 2.7.2 and I'm using sqlite3 as the
I think the problem is that the testing tool is trying to reset the
database and when it tries to truncate this table it can't. Well, I'm
pretty sure, but I don't know how to fix it. The table references itself.
On 15 February 2012 14:06, 赵帅 wrote:
>
> Did you delete one key or update the key to
Did you delete one key or update the key to different values that was
referenced by another table as foreign key.
2012/2/15 xina towner
> Hello, I get this error when I try to test my app. I'm using mysql. I
> think it's when django tries to delete the table. I've tried with all On
> delete optio
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Mario Gudelj wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I have this issue I can not work out for the life of me. I would really
> appreciate it if someone could help.
> This is my model:
> class Business(models.Model):
> ...
> slug = models.SlugField("Slug", max_length=255, uniq
As another idea, can you just update your SITE_ID setting (http://
docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.2/ref/settings/#site-id)? It defaults to 1
(for the example.com instance), but if you've got a new Site object
for your actual domain, you should just be able to use its id instead.
-Justin
On Jul 10, 7:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Fynn wrote:
> Exception Type: IntegrityError at /comments/post/
> Exception Value: insert or update on table "django_comments" violates
> foreign key constraint "django_comments_site_id_fkey"
> DETAIL: Key (site_id)=(1) is not present in table "django_site".
>
>
thanks again anssi, stellar reply
I might do this below. the tracking is the last thing to happen
before rendering,
so there are no more UPDATE or INSERTS
and in most cases views that use tracking don't do anything but select
anyway
but OTOH I'm already running rabbit and celery so I might mess
On Jun 14, 1:24 am, felix wrote:
> brilliant, you are correct:
>
> Foreign-key constraints:
> "traffic_tracking2010_content_type_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY
> (content_type_id) REFERENCES django_content_type(id) DEFERRABLE
> INITIALLY DEFERRED
> "traffic_tracking2010_src_content_type_id_fkey" FOR
brilliant, you are correct:
Foreign-key constraints:
"traffic_tracking2010_content_type_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY
(content_type_id) REFERENCES django_content_type(id) DEFERRABLE
INITIALLY DEFERRED
"traffic_tracking2010_src_content_type_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY
(src_content_type_id) REFERENCES djan
> Can anybody figure out why the IntegrityError doesn't get thrown till
> then ?
> Why didn't Django catch errors thrown in middleware ?
Most likely the foreign keys are defined as "deferrable initially
deferred", meaning that the database doesn't check them before commit.
And this of course mean
Problem has been solved and it doesn't have connection to any bugs,
it was just programming error (there was shipment.save() somewhere
later
in python code)
On Mar 30, 10:21 am, naos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have problem with foreign key contraint upon calling delete() on my
> model. Here's my prob
Karen:
Yayyy!!! Thank you!
On Sep 23, 11:45 am, Karen Tracey wrote:
...
> /home/kmt/software/web/playground/ttt/newfields.py(56)to_python()
>
> -> utc_dt = super(DateTimeFieldInTZ, self).__init__(value, *args, **kwargs)
...
> I don't actually have a clue what the code here is trying to do,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
>
> Karen:
>
> Thank you so much for your reply.
>
> On Sep 23, 7:01 am, Karen Tracey wrote:
> > What you haven't shared is the code for DateTimeFieldInTZ. It's going to
> be
> > rather hard to figure out what is going wrong without seeing th
Karen:
Thank you so much for your reply.
On Sep 23, 7:01 am, Karen Tracey wrote:
> What you haven't shared is the code for DateTimeFieldInTZ. It's going to be
> rather hard to figure out what is going wrong without seeing that code.
...
> If you show us what is in the DateTimeFieldInTZ impleme
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
>
> Hi, folks:
>
> I'm new to Django. It's a very powerful system, and I appreciate the
> work of the people who built it up into what I'm benefiting from.
>
> I'm having a difficulty with a very simple app which exercises a
> custom field type
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:03 AM, rekha wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> im a newbie, developing online address book application using django,
> mod_python, apache2, postgresql.
>
> i have two tables in my database viz login_table and contact_table..
> login_table stores username and password.. contact table
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:00 AM, He Jibo wrote:
> Thank you so much for your detailed explanation. I have tried your
> suggestion of "The relatively simple solution that _might_ work (depending
> on the details of your project) is to remove references to contrib.auth and
> contrib.contenttypes in
Thank you so much for your detailed explanation. I have tried your
suggestion of "The relatively simple solution that _might_ work (depending
on the details of your project) is to remove references to contrib.auth and
contrib.contenttypes in your fixture. "
It seems to work. However, I confronted a
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM, He Jibo wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I ran into the following error of "IntegrityError: columns app_label, model
> are not unique" when I tried to
> Sync the data to the db with the command of "manage.py syncdb". I am using
> python2.5, Django-1.0.2-final, and Window XP.
Found help on IRC:
Since my TagField is named "tags", i have to set
``tag_descriptor_attr`` to some other name when registering it.
tagging.register(Post, tag_descriptor_attr='_tags')
On Oct 2, 12:01 pm, smcoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone tell me if i set up the model and admin cor
Can someone tell me if i set up the model and admin correctly?
On Sep 30, 2:05 pm, smcoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm trying to get a TagField working in the admin for my model using
> django-tagging 0.2. i get an IntegrityError when i save my model from
> the admin- it looks like django is
Thanks Brian,
One more question, there is another way to write a custom validator
without override the field type?
Nuno
On May 9, 5:30 pm, Brian Rosner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 9, 4:31 am, Nuno Mariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm using newforms-admin and I've got a "duplicate k
On May 9, 4:31 am, Nuno Mariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using newforms-admin and I've got a "duplicate key violates unique
> constraint" when I'm added new record(with the same value on field
> that already exists in the db) in admin interface.
> I've an "unique=True" in the field, should
The problem there was that much of the data I was importing came from
the
site's old MySQL database from before I started using PostGIS and
GeoDjango.
Does anyone know if there's a way to tell Postgresql to automatically
detect what's
in the table and resequence?
On Mar 28, 1:17 pm, "Brian Armstr
Yes, of course there is a constraint there: the primary key, which of
course I don't want to remove. Marty's solution was it. Thanks for
the assistance.
On Mar 28, 12:50 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:35 PM, makebelieve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
You, my friend, rule. That's exactly what I needed to do. I've just
recently moved
from MySQL and am at the point in which I appreciate Postgresql's
strictness, but
I am still getting used to it.
On Mar 28, 12:57 pm, "Marty Alchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that you say you're working
Also, if you have access to the old DB still, consider exporting the
entire thing out again. Make sure that you include the structural
part as well as the data itself. It should export it directly as a
series of SQL statements. A complete dump will provide information
about the sequences.
--~-
Given that you say you're working with PG Navicat, I assume you're
using Postgresql as your database. Postgresql has a concept of
sequences, which it uses to generate IDs for auto-generated fields
like Django's AutoField.
I think what you've done, by copying data in directly, is created
records w
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:35 PM, makebelieve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't added any unique contraints. It really seems as though
> django doesn't know
> about my existing data. If I obliterate the old data everything works
> fine, but
> that's not a possibility.
At the database l
I haven't added any unique contraints. It really seems as though
django doesn't know
about my existing data. If I obliterate the old data everything works
fine, but
that's not a possibility.
On Mar 28, 12:13 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, makeb
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, makebelieve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Saving some of my objects work, but only because early IDs have been
> removed
> so it isn't trying to insert an object with an existing ID.
It sounds like you have a unique constraint in the DB that you haven't
told Dja
I'm really in a bind here and need to get my site back up.
Any help at all will be greatly appreciated.
Saving some of my objects work, but only because early IDs have been
removed
so it isn't trying to insert an object with an existing ID.
Is there anyway to make django 'know' about the existin
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 06:24 -0700, sector119 wrote:
> My models has primary key it's 'id' field and this field is
> prepopulated in Person.save() method
>
> def _get_id(self):
> return int(str(self.pid)+str(self.location.id))
>
> def save(self, raw=False):
> self.id = se
My models has primary key it's 'id' field and this field is
prepopulated in Person.save() method
def _get_id(self):
return int(str(self.pid)+str(self.location.id))
def save(self, raw=False):
self.id = self._get_id()
super(Person, self).save(raw=raw)
But in:
class
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 05:51 -0700, sector119 wrote:
[...]
> I try to write my own comand to manage.py which imports data in some
> format to the db.
> I write my own serializer which yields
> base.DeserializedObject(self.model(**data), m2m_data).
>
> When I run deserlialized object save method I
It should be a collation issue.
mysql> set names utf8;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select 'm n'='men';
+--+
| 'm n'='men' |
+--+
|1 |
+--+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
You might want to use the SELECT BINARY operator:
mysql> select bin
This was because the default values of the id fields nextval(...) s
were not created in the new db, when I port the data by backup &
restore.
On 7 Haziran, 21:11, omat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, I suspect that during moving existing data into the new
> database, somethings might h
By the way, I suspect that during moving existing data into the new
database, somethings might have been broken, like auto incrementation
sequences.
But, although I experimented with them a little, it didn't help.
On 7 Haziran, 21:07, omat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My application is working
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 05:42 -0700, sandro.dentella wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I noticed that recently has been added InterityError as a common
> exception
> for all db (django.db.IntegrityError), so I wanted to make my view
> aware
> of that, but I'm uncertain on how to accomplish this.
>
> I
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 12:59 +0300, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> >In a correct SQL implementation, NULL is not comparable to anything,
> >
> >
> Yes... It should be :-). And as you said implementation is the whole
> another businness. johnsu01 talked about MySQL and give
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>In a correct SQL implementation, NULL is not comparable to anything,
>
>
Yes... It should be :-). And as you said implementation is the whole
another businness. johnsu01 talked about MySQL and given its history of
not very strong adherence to standard but preferring
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 11:25 +0300, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> johnsu01 wrote:
>
> >Using trunk, I have a model that has a number of fields which are
> >CharFields, that I would like to be optional but if they are filled
> >out, unique.
> >
> >
> I may be well wrong but I don't think you can express
Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> if model.get_list(**{'self.field_name'+'__exact':field_data})
>
>
Ouch :-) Make this 'get_list' to be 'get_count' instead...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django
johnsu01 wrote:
>Using trunk, I have a model that has a number of fields which are
>CharFields, that I would like to be optional but if they are filled
>out, unique.
>
>
I may be well wrong but I don't think you can express this at DB level.
Uniqueness at DB level includes empty value (even NU
85 matches
Mail list logo
