Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-26 Thread Eugene Lazutkin
I updated the Windows installer for Django 0.96 using bdist_nsi and NSIS 2.18. Until it is hosted by djangoproject.com, ask me for a copy. Thanks, Eugene James Bennett wrote: > We're pleased to announce the release of Django 0.96 today; this > release involves cleanup and stabilization of feat

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-26 Thread Marius Scurtescu
On 3/26/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/24/07, mariuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hm, yes, there is such a folder: > > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-0.95.1-py2.4.egg > > > > but isn't this recorded in some registry/database/path as well? > > No -- this is ju

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-26 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 3/24/07, mariuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hm, yes, there is such a folder: > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-0.95.1-py2.4.egg > > but isn't this recorded in some registry/database/path as well? No -- this is just one of the reasons I greatly dislike eggs :/ > Is it safe to just re

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-24 Thread mariuss
On Mar 24, 1:22 pm, "Todd O'Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Django gets installed in your Python version's site-packages > folder--/usr/lib/python2.x/site-packages is typical for Linux. Probably > the easiest thing to do is delete the django folder you find there and > re-install. Hm, yes, th

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-24 Thread Todd O'Bryan
Django gets installed in your Python version's site-packages folder--/usr/lib/python2.x/site-packages is typical for Linux. Probably the easiest thing to do is delete the django folder you find there and re-install. Todd On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 13:14 -0700, mariuss wrote: > On Mar 23, 5:13 pm, "ma

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-24 Thread mariuss
On Mar 23, 5:13 pm, "mariuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I downloaded 0.96 and installed it using "python setup.py install" > > But it is still Django 0.95.1 (previously installed) that shows up. > How can I uninstall the old version? Any suggestions? Pointers to some documentation? The answer

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-24 Thread James Bennett
On 3/24/07, Marc Fargas Esteve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe the release notes should say that newforms do not yet support File > uploads in an easy way (see #3297) just to warn people moving from oldforms > to newforms ;) The release notes, I believe, mention that newforms is still under de

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-24 Thread Marc Fargas Esteve
Hi James, Maybe the release notes should say that newforms do not yet support File uploads in an easy way (see #3297) just to warn people moving from oldforms to newforms ;) Cheers, Marc. On 3/23/07, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We're pleased to announce the release of Django 0.

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well done everyone! Take the weekend off :-) --Simon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-23 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 24-Mar-07, at 3:52 AM, David M. Besonen wrote: >> There are also a few backwards-incompatible changes, documented >> in the release notes[1] > > what are the django devs' intentions wrt backwards-compatibility? > > eg. will backwards-compatibility be guaranteed for any 1.xx > release? that i

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-23 Thread mariuss
I downloaded 0.96 and installed it using "python setup.py install" But it is still Django 0.95.1 (previously installed) that shows up. How can I uninstall the old version? Thanks, Marius --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-23 Thread David M. Besonen
On Fri, March 23, 2007 2:32 pm, James Bennett wrote: > There are also a few backwards-incompatible changes, documented > in the release notes[1] what are the django devs' intentions wrt backwards-compatibility? eg. will backwards-compatibility be guaranteed for any 1.xx release? --~--~---

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-23 Thread Jeremy Dunck
Sorry, too fast with the tab and enter sequence. :) Ahem. Please see http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/api_stability/ But for a short answer, yes, at 1.0, there is a commitment to backwards compatibility. Some APIs are already stable, and it's documented at the previous URL. Cheers

Re: Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-23 Thread Jeremy Dunck
David, On 3/23/07, David M. Besonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, March 23, 2007 2:32 pm, James Bennett wrote: > > > There are also a few backwards-incompatible changes, documented > > in the release notes[1] > > what are the django devs' intentions wrt backwards-compatibility? > > eg.

Announcing Django 0.96!

2007-03-23 Thread James Bennett
We're pleased to announce the release of Django 0.96 today; this release involves cleanup and stabilization of features from the 0.95 release, along with some nice new features: an integrated testing framework, the first release of the newforms library, and a ton of useful improvements. There are