Oh. I get it, sorry. Any suggestions on my next question about
file.read() would be thankful.
On Mar 19, 5:20 pm, Paulo Almeida wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My suggestion to zip the files was to provide a single download link with
> all the files.
>
> - Paulo
>
> On Fri, Mar 19
admin
>
> - Paulo
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:57 AM, tezro wrote:
> > Hello everyone. I need some help or advice.
>
> > I've got a form with 20 ImageFields - such a form for sending photos
> > to the site admin as a request for a new user. Well, Django cert
Hi. All that you say is totally clear to me, but I tried to suit the
customer's needs. And, yes, I finished my deals on just saving the
images serverside and sending links to files over e-mail. Thanks for
that.
Another question that bothers me is the following.
---
Hello everyone. I need some help or advice.
I've got a form with 20 ImageFields - such a form for sending photos
to the site admin as a request for a new user. Well, Django certainly
handles and uploads the, that's OK. But when it comes to sending all
the files as an attachment - I got stuck.
Her
o have a good idea of what you
> want.
>
> On Dec 17, 6:42 am, tezro wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone. Making well-structured websites on Django is a very
> > comprehensive process. All these blogs, news, user-related stuff -
> > easy. But what about, say, corporate webs
Hello everyone. Making well-structured websites on Django is a very
comprehensive process. All these blogs, news, user-related stuff -
easy. But what about, say, corporate website? I mean I got a project
to do, thought it would be great to base it on Django as usual, but...
Look at the structure,
shell or admin site -
works still fine...
On Dec 12, 5:56 pm, Shawn Milochik wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2009, at 8:08 AM, tezro wrote:
>
> > Nope. Did it again on a clean project with the same models migrated
> > then by South.
>
> > Same error. Any other clues?
>
> > Tha
Nope. Did it again on a clean project with the same models migrated
then by South.
Same error. Any other clues?
Thanks for replies.
On Dec 12, 3:25 am, Shawn Milochik wrote:
> Why did you manually add a 'slug' field to your database after modifying the
> model? Django's syncdb does a lot more
Oops, sorry. Didn't remove the index. Now it worked. Proceeding :)
On Dec 12, 3:51 pm, tezro wrote:
> Added a migration with South... Ran it.
>
> ---
> Running migrations for news:
> - Migrating forwards to 0002_add_slug.
> > news: 0002_add_slug
> Traceback (mos
Added a migration with South... Ran it.
---
Running migrations for news:
- Migrating forwards to 0002_add_slug.
> news: 0002_add_slug
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/tezro/lib/python2.5/South-0.6.2-py2.5.egg/south/
migration.py", line 330, in r
x27;slug' doesn't have a default value"
- fixing that from model or base doesn't help either.
But... the code works from the shell fine.
That's all.
On Dec 12, 12:58 am, Shawn Milochik wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 4:51 PM, tezro wrote:
>
>
>
> > Seems li
Seems like no clues...
On Dec 10, 12:21 am, bruno desthuilliers
wrote:
> On 9 déc, 18:58, tezro wrote:
> (snip)
>
>
>
> > That throws an error: TypeError: 'slug' is an invalid keyword argument
> > for this function.
>
> > What am I doing wrong?
&
Firstly, we have simple template.
---
{% load pagination_tags %}
{% block first_column %}
{% autopaginate object_list %}
{% paginate %}
{% endblock %}
---
Suppose, we have "second_column", so how do I get the current page
number, number of all pages paginated, or even next/previous
alid keyword argument for this function
---
On Dec 10, 12:21 am, bruno desthuilliers
wrote:
> On 9 déc, 18:58, tezro wrote:
> (snip)
>
>
>
> > That throws an error: TypeError: 'slug' is an invalid keyword argument
> > for this function.
>
> > What a
Hi everyone. I'm using Django 1.1.0, importing it and using in another
file "robot_parser.py". I've been using it for months.
The script aggregates news from different sources and saves them using
Django ORM. Presently I used primary key for urls (http://www.site.com/
news/2009/jan/12/72828/), but
y as (1)
> 3. use list_detail.object_list
> Since 1-2 are dirty, I would recommend 3rd way. I'll let you know if I could
> suggest something else :)
>
> 2009/10/19 tezro
>
>
>
>
>
> > Surely I could use the list_detail.object_list, but the use of date
> > based g
view.
> Why don't you use list_detail.object_list view? If you need just to order
> list by date, you can use ordering on the model
> level:http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/options/#ordering
>
> 2009/10/18 tezro
>
>
>
>
>
> > Would it? If &q
nyways, thanks for reply :)
On Oct 18, 11:04 pm, Mihail Lukin wrote:
> Look at date_based.py:
>
> if date_list and num_latest:
> latest = queryset.order_by('-'+date_field)[:num_latest]
> else:
> latest = None
>
> So, if you use num_late
Anyone?
On Aug 14, 8:29 am, tezro wrote:
> The question is that "django.views.generic.date_based.archive_index()"
> takes an optional argument "num_latest" which is 15 by default.
> Setting it manually to num_latest=10 is way off to correct to
> me.
The question is that "django.views.generic.date_based.archive_index()"
takes an optional argument "num_latest" which is 15 by default.
Setting it manually to num_latest=10 is way off to correct to
me. It works. I suppose that it even doesn't retrieve all the tons of
data from the DB, but w
20 matches
Mail list logo
