On 2006-12-22, Victor Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, sorry for the long delay in replying. Holiday season and work
> craziness is getting in the way of writing free software - which is
> really the fun part isn't it? ;)
:-)
> It's a little different, but barely.
>
> The current codebase
On 2006-12-24, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12/24/06, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's the quality of the Schema Evolution code from last summer?
>
> Not done.
>
>> Is it
>> at all usable?
> No.
>
>> Is it fixable?
> Yes.
>
> Anyway, you seem enthusiastic.
> Here
On 2006-12-18, Eric Walstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>> Hello to any Bay Area Django folks out there --
>>
>> I'll be in San Francisco later this week. Anybody interested in having
>> a Django meetup Thursday night?
>>
>> Adrian
>
> Ooh, a meetup would be awesome. D
On 2006-12-11, Victor Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got a rough version of schema evolution working now.
>
> The basic implementation is what the SoC project was trying to do.
[...]
> I honestly think it's a *bad* solution to the problem. I've been
> looking at sqlalchemy and the 'migr
On 2006-12-17, Victor Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Test coverage is ~44 test cases. There are currently 2 known problems
> in the code from a 'correctness' standpoint, and there is a ton of
> refactoring that needs to be done before it should be considered for
> merging into the trunk.
I se
On 2006-12-15, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Either way, the ultimate goal would be to convince Adrian that the
> branch is stable, get him to take a look at it, and merge the branch
> into the trunk. Adrian is pretty busy, so I'm guessing he would be
> looking for some communi
On 2006-12-17, Victor Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FYI - the schema evolution code submitted from the SoC project doesn't
> work, so keeping it up to date is a moot point. There have been
> several posts from people trying to use it where the SoC version of
> the schema evolution code just h
On 2006-12-14, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12/13/06, Steve Hutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does it have a realistic chance of being accepted into core if it's found
>> to be bug free? Is it fully documented? Is the desig
On 2006-12-14, Victor Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The patch I previous sent in mostly adds a couple functions to the
> psycopg2 backend in the introspection module. The only big changes
> that affect the mainline django code are in django.core.management.
>
> I'm using my patches, so that's
On 2006-12-11, Victor Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
> I've got a rough version of schema evolution working now.
>
> The basic implementation is what the SoC project was trying to do.
[...]
> On 12/3/06, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> The behaviour you are seek
10 matches
Mail list logo
