On 2006-12-14, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/13/06, Steve Hutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Does it have a realistic chance of being accepted into core if it's found >> to be bug free? Is it fully documented? Is the design controversial or >> does it follow a community consensus? > > There was discussion about the general problem of schema evolution > before the SOC project was started. The discussion was started by > Jacob, and other committers (Luke and Malcolm) weighed in at the time, > along with many other interested onlookers. The resulting design is on > the wiki.
That's good to hear. > Assuming that the implementation matches the proposal, I would say > there is a realistic chance of it getting accepted into core. However, > this would require that the implementation is up to date, and bug free > (including tests to validate this status that are integrated into the > Django system tests). I see. It sounds like it may be a bit of moving target, due to changes in core. Maybe a good goal would be to get the implementation up to date (maybe that's what Victor has done?) and make sure the test coverage is in place (I'm not sure the status of this?). Then publicize it a bit and call for testers to essentially try what would essentially be a release candidate. Maybe someone is already thinking along these lines? It seems like the branch could benefit from a "champion" who actively pushes it through. Steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
