http://dpaste.com/hold/4539/
I think I still have an issue with related fields that werent included
in the query
On Jan 10, 8:15 am, "David Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use this paste instead, I found an issue :)
>
> http://dpaste.com/hold/4537/
>
> On Jan 10, 6:41 am, "David Cramer" <[E
Use this paste instead, I found an issue :)
http://dpaste.com/hold/4537/
On Jan 10, 6:41 am, "David Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alright, anyways, if someone wants to test this, it worked 100% for me,
> the updated select_related(). I'm not sure if we're updated with the
> latest nightly
On 1/9/07, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using full page caching, or view caching, is not an option for us on
> most pages, as things vary such as moderation options.
There are still plenty of ways you can make use of the cache. From
what you've said, I think two in particular are wor
Hi all,
I released new version of Django AMF.
Now it supports AMF3 format which is the default
serialization used for ActionScript 3.0.
http://djangoamf.sourceforge.jp/index.php?DjangoAMF_en
http://djangoamf.sourceforge.jp/index.php?UserManual_en
http://sourceforge.jp/projects/djangoamf/
Djang
Using full page caching, or view caching, is not an option for us on
most pages, as things vary such as moderation options.
On Jan 10, 5:26 am, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/9/07, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think you understand. We do not want the te
Alright, anyways, if someone wants to test this, it worked 100% for me,
the updated select_related(). I'm not sure if we're updated with the
latest nightly but ill try to get that done today.
http://dpaste.com/4536/
This replaces django/db/query.py and adds two arguments for
select_related():
d
David Cramer wrote:
> While working on my select_related changes, I noticed that the db
> backend was doing COUNT(*) for .count().. why?
>
> I've changed it on my local copy to count the id column, but unless
> anyone can give me a specific reason, as far as I recall, it's faster
> to just count
On 1/9/07, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think you understand. We do not want the template to be able to
> execute any queries that have not already been done by the time it's
> hit the render phase. If it hasnt been executed, we don't want it
> accessible. The reason for this
While working on my select_related changes, I noticed that the db
backend was doing COUNT(*) for .count().. why?
I've changed it on my local copy to count the id column, but unless
anyone can give me a specific reason, as far as I recall, it's faster
to just count on the id column.
On Dec 26 200
I don't think you understand. We do not want the template to be able to
execute any queries that have not already been done by the time it's
hit the render phase. If it hasnt been executed, we don't want it
accessible. The reason for this is to stop queries going outside of our
cache and/or view.
On 1/9/07, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to come up with an optional, or simply, a solution for our
> framework, where designers do not get access to do the SQL through the
> template on related attributes.
Also, bear in mind that this option locks you in to the unpleasant
si
On 1/9/07, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll happily modify django for what I want, I just need some help on
> where to start... as I dug around for an hour or two the other day and
> couldn't see where exactly the related objects execute the lazy sql. If
> nothing else, I guess I cou
I'm currently creating a web app that will create a case file for every
company record, it will also create multiple contacts for a case files,
below are copies of the files and views.
Basically I'm developing a form that will allow a user to create a new
case file and add multiple contacts at th
select_related is horrible slow on 90% of large database queries, and I
haven't managed to implement the functionality I want in it yet.
I'd like to come up with an optional, or simply, a solution for our
framework, where designers do not get access to do the SQL through the
template on related a
Robert Slotboom wrote:
> > sorted(Category.objects.all(), key=Category.get_absolute_url)
>
> This is a very nice approach!
> Although, shouldn't these "get_absolute_url" calls be followed by () ?
Nope! Python will call it for you. The good thing is it will only call
it once per item instead of on
reinmar wrote:
> Hi David,
> This sounds truly disturbing. Can you give an example of how your
> templates execute SQL queries? That would help in giving specific
> advice.
David,
Ignore that, I missed the discussion at the duplicate post
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_threa
I've done a good amount of searching the archives and the wiki on the site
looking for the answer to this question. If this has already been answered,
please accept my apology for repeating the question and please point me to
the answer.
I'm looking to find out if there's a method to access djang
Hi David,
This sounds truly disturbing. Can you give an example of how your
templates execute SQL queries? That would help in giving specific
advice.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" g
On 1/9/07, Tim Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Any suggestions for which direction I should pursue? (Building
> Apache2 + building mod_python) Options I haven't uncovered?
I went this route under OpenBSD 3.9 and have had very few issues. The most
trouble I had was with getting mod_pytho
Hi Brian,
Of course the parenthesis... I'll this fix tomorrow.
> sorted(Category.objects.all(), key=Category.get_absolute_url)
This is a very nice approach!
Although, shouldn't these "get_absolute_url" calls be followed by () ?
Thank's
Rob
>
> Rob Slotboom wrote:
>> in the model class:
>>
Hi,
Another option that has been considered by more and more people is Nginx.
This page it's in polish, but the configuration files are pretty understandable:
http://www.python.rk.edu.pl/w/p/django-pod-serwerem-nginx/
A podcast is here:
http://mx.bw.rulez-forever.com/Django-Nginx-FastCGI-screenca
On 1/9/07, Chris Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Presumably I can also use that in a template :
> {% object.get_kind_display %}
Yup.
--
"May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house."
-- George Carlin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received t
> Each instance of your model will have a special method name
> 'get_foo_display', where 'foo' is the name of the field with the
> choices. For example:
I should have found that. Thanks.
> >>> b.get_kind_display()
Presumably I can also use that in a template :
{% object.get_kind_display %}
Chr
I'm setting up an OpenBSD server and would like to start testing
some projects using Django. Are there any bits of sage advice
that could be given? At this point, I'm not tied to anything
else (Apache vs. Lighttpd; mod_python vs. WSGI; etc).
Some of the speedbumps that I've come across in my
On 1/9/07, Chris Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the admin, it displays the current value nicely (the second column), but
> on my page, it displays the actual value from the database (the first
> column) instead. I'd like to display the value used by the admin form, but
> can't figure where
Hi everybody,
I'm newbie at django but I think is awesome. I use newforms and I had
two questions:
1) I have a model with a FileField so everything at the admin
interface works fine, but when I get the form using form_for_model the
widget isn't a FileInput(). Is this the right behaviour? or it's
In our database we have a TextField that stores the body of our posts
in RestructuredText. I've recently added TinyMCE to the Django Admin,
so I'm wanting to convert this field from rst to plain old html.
I wrote a little thing of code to do this with Django.
def convert_post(request):
I have model with field with choices set, similar to that in the
documentation at
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model_api/#choices
In the admin, it displays the current value nicely (the second column), but
on my page, it displays the actual value from the database (the first
column)
On 1/9/07, chasfs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was looking at django.contrib.auth.models and noticed _ in front of
> the first parameter, e.g.
> first_name = models.CharField(_('first name'), maxlength=30,
> blank=True)
>
> What does that mean/do?
>
See line 5 of that file:
from
On 1/9/07, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to setup some kind of blocking mechanism so that while rendering
> a template the models will not do any SQL queries that have not already
> been executed, or at least block the related field queries.
Unfortunately I think this would be
Rob Slotboom wrote:
> in the model class:
>def __cmp__(self, other):
>return cmp(self.get_absolute_url, other.get_absolute_url)
>
> In a function:
>cat_list = []
>for cat in Category.objects.all():
> cat_list.append(cat)
>cat_list.sort()
Hi Rob,
I think the problem
I was looking at django.contrib.auth.models and noticed _ in front of
the first parameter, e.g.
first_name = models.CharField(_('first name'), maxlength=30,
blank=True)
What does that mean/do?
Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
Hello,
I need to filter the results of my admin change_list page.
Following Chapter 18 of the wonderfull djangobook I managed to build
my Custom View for a change_list page. Unfortunately I lost all the
pretty things like, the search field, date hierarchy, filter per day
month, etc. These are my s
On 1/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just getting data from the database in the following way.
>
> info.antiigm_set.values()
OK, that narrows it down. ;-)
Also, are you running on trunk or some other version of Django?
> The application is running on a linux server coul
Hi James,
> You don't need to write a manipulator; just write a validator
> function, and put it in the validator_list for that field on the
> model. Django will handle calling the validator for you any time one
> of the "automatic" manipulators (e.g., in the admin) gets used.
>
Ok I got it work
Could someone elaborate on updating last_login or otherwise making it
more usable? Time between logins can be much longer than when they were
actually last seen. Currently I have a middleware solution that's not
really working at all.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You re
Thanks for the insight!
Though I myself like to have new development open to the community,
my client insists that he own the code, I have no choice.
I wish to us django in a big way and delight him :)
On Jan 7, 4:45 am, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/6/07, Rex <[EMAIL PROTECT
I can't use {{ form.field_name }} because the field_name is the dynamic
part. The form is generated by a database configuration and I won't
know ahead of time which fields will need to be in the form. I imagine
django would make it easy to do something like this, since the admin
interface also req
On 1/9/07, Rob Slotboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course this wil not work because class "HasUniquePath" isn't a
> manupulator.
> I dont know however how to extend the object's manipulators.
You don't need to write a manipulator; just write a validator
function, and put it in the validator_
On 1/9/07, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm talking completely about the related objects accessors, and not
> sending models to the templates is not a good solution for us :)
>
> I want to setup some kind of blocking mechanism so that while rendering
> a template the models will not
My model uses a single table parent-child relationship.
I got the parent representation working but I isn't sorted right.
So I tried to sort the list of objects, returned by objects.all()
in the model class:
def __cmp__(self, other):
return cmp(self.get_absolute_url, other.get_absolute_
Hello,
I'm just getting data from the database in the following way.
info.antiigm_set.values()
The application is running on a linux server could that be the problem
?
Richard
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Apache version Apache
Apache threaded MPM No (single thread MPM)
Apache forked MPM Yes, maximum 256 processes
Apache server root /usr/local/apache2
Apache document root/home/hosting/kolokolo_beta/subdomains/bikeshop
Apache error log/home/hosting/kolokolo_beta/logs/error
Hmm,
I wrote this in my models.py. Errors rased are just for debugging.
class HasUniquePath(object):
def __init__(self, cat_obj, error_message=gettext_lazy("No unique
path!")):
self.cur_cat = cat_obj
self.error_message = error_message
self.always_test = True
def __call__
Are they both installed into the same python version? Maybe you
installed Django into python 2.4, and mod_python into python 2.5 (at
least it appears to be in 2.5). From what I looked at I thought django
was best installed in 2.4 (sorry, I don't recall where I saw that). Of
course then mod_python
Thanks James,
I'll try this one
def IsUniqueForPath():
...
class Category(models.Model):
...
parent = models.ForeignKey('self', blank=True, null=True,
related_name='child_set', validator_list=[IsUniqueForPath])
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
On 1/9/07, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> > table1.objects.filter(table2_attribute_name.field='foo')
>
> Did you mean
>
> table1.objects.filter(table2_attribute_name__field='foo')
>
>
> (i.e. '__' instead of '.')?
Bah. Yes, of course. Brain shutdown
Hi James,
When I write a custom validator like: isValidCategory() I need a
manipulator, validator and a form. Is there a way to use the 'current'
ones and to expand these or do I need to create them from scratch?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
48 matches
Mail list logo
