Hi,
I just came across Django a few days ago and found it quite
interesting. There are a few things I'd like to note:
1: I followed the tutorial and set up the poll app. After adding
several polls and choices via the admin page, that page showed the
'recent actions' list of links. Clicking on th
I tried to set-up a django project using mod_python on Apache/1.3.33
and I can only get mod_python error messages. The admin part displays
the following traceback (it works fine with django-admin.py runserver):
-
Mod_python error: "PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython"
Traceback (mo
Sorry, I seem to have forgotten to close my message properly.
I've tried searching for information about this, but I was unable to
find anything obvious and it's a little bit beyond my knowledge of
Apache. Does anyone have any ideas what I might try to make this work?
Thanks,
Bradley Peters
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 9/18/05, Eric Walstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Is it possible to do what I want, move common fields to a super class,
> > without generating a table for that super class?
>
> It's not currently possible, but that exact functionality is on the
> to-do list: h
On Sunday 18 September 2005 03:55 am, Andreas wrote:
> I just discovered TurboGears, another MVC web development framework
> based on Python (turbogears.org). Judging from the 20-Minute-Demo-Video
> it seems to be quite similar to Django, although lacking the slick
> admin interface. What do you t
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 9/18/05, Eric Walstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I'd like to make a base class for my model classes that defines some
>>fields but doesn't result in a table in the database. If my base class
>>is derived from meta.Model, then django makes a table for it in the
>>d
I have reported this as spam.
Scott Pierce
On 9/18/05, Eric Walstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to make a base class for my model classes that defines some
> fields but doesn't result in a table in the database. If my base class
> is derived from meta.Model, then django makes a table for it in the
> database.
>
> Is it possible
Hi all,
I'd like to make a base class for my model classes that defines some
fields but doesn't result in a table in the database. If my base class
is derived from meta.Model, then django makes a table for it in the
database.
Is it possible to do what I want, move common fields to a super class
I don't know that I would call it hacking around. Yes. There seems to
be a lot of stuff within the admin that is not exposed outside of the
admin. Manipulators will act accordingly if given formfieldcollections
for "inline" tables; however, they aren't exposed outside the admin as
they should o
Brant Harris wrote:
> > How would this model be implemented in Django? The API provides a
> > special case where a recursive relationship back to the current
entity
> > is denoted by ForeignKey('self'), but for the more general case of
a
> > circular relationship I can't see a way to avoid the Nam
scottpierce wrote:
> See http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/338. The patch works.
>
> Scott Pierce
>
>
So basically, mainipulators are completely useless when it comes to
ForeignKeys and ManyToManys and need to be hacked around in the view
function?
This is a horrible fix. I'm going to fix
Hello everyone!
After few months of hard work, my site with free downloads is finally
up and running. I have tried to create a site that goes right to the
point and cuts through all of the software downloads. Having read this
group for quite a while, it looks like there are a lot of knowledgeable
I just discovered TurboGears, another MVC web development framework
based on Python (turbogears.org). Judging from the 20-Minute-Demo-Video
it seems to be quite similar to Django, although lacking the slick
admin interface. What do you think about it? How does it compare to
Django?
Please, never a float. Use Decimal Type.
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0327.html
15 matches
Mail list logo
