Re: Localflavor Improvements.

2011-11-07 Thread Finn Gruwier Larsen
I agree to both. Den 07-11-2011 23:55, Jli skrev: Yes ! This is the kind of thing I had in mind! Also what do you guys think of integrating a feature like this one into local flavor ? https://github.com/ulule/django-countries It would be easier to maintain an accurate list. I think. The same g

Re: Localflavor Improvements.

2011-11-07 Thread Jli
Yes ! This is the kind of thing I had in mind! Also what do you guys think of integrating a feature like this one into local flavor ? https://github.com/ulule/django-countries It would be easier to maintain an accurate list. I think. The same goes with Cities and Zip codes. It's always a burden t

Re: Localflavor Improvements.

2011-10-30 Thread Sergiy Kuzmenko
It would be useful to have a consistent interface between localflavor modules. Something in the line of the following: SUBDIVISION_NAME - top level subdivision name, e.g., "state", "province", "county", "parish" etc. or None if there are no subdivisions. POSTAL_CODE_NAME - "zip", "postal code", "p

Localflavor Improvements.

2011-10-30 Thread Jli
Hi, According to this ticket https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17136, I found the localflavor module being a very neat idea but was a bit disappointed with the actual consistency between the different locales and their implementation. Also, the difference in implementation makes the documenta