Re: FSFE and promoting software quality

On 2021-02-18 09:55, Bernhard E. Reiter wrote: There has been some cooperation in the past (I'll have to look it up), this is why I know that it is not easy and a wide field. For most people, the quality aspect of software development is not what they are interested in initially. And in general

Re: FSFE and promoting software quality

Hello, Am Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2021, 09:26:26 CET schrieb Vitaly Repin: [GNU coding standards] > Why not to promote them instead of inventing the wheel with FSFE > standards? As just I did, the GNU coding standards are still a good read for Free Software initiatives developing in C and C++.

Re: FSFE and promoting software quality

Hello, Den ons 17 feb. 2021 kl 16:21 skrev Bernhard E. Reiter : > If we come up with other practical guidelines, even for code, why not? > I considered the GNU coding standards as maintained by FSFE's US based sister > organisation useful https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/index.html >

Re: (F)LOSS stock trading?

On 2/17/21 4:32 PM, Bernhard E. Reiter wrote: > Hello, > > Am Donnerstag 04 Februar 2021 03:25:22 schrieb Jacob Hrbek: >> Looking for a (F)LOSS alternative to Robinhood >> [] > a software product could be the app, but for real transactions to work, > you'd need a broke