Hello Eric,
In USRP1, I don't want AD9862 to use in my application for many reasons.
Am looking for changing four parallel pipes of ADC's into two parallel pipes
of ADC's(having interleaved IQ as in the case of DAC's).
I need only changes required to be done in FPGA. Although i know that the
ADC
Hi Eric
What is the difference between WBX_NG and WBX_LO.
If we see in the daughter boards ID's, there are two ID's available for WBX.
Which is the right EEPROM ID for WBX daughter board ?.
Regards
Sanjay
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnurad
Thanks for the information Jason.
what is the suffix "_NG" used for ?.
Just making sure to understand what it refers to.
Thanks and Regards
Sanjay
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Jason Abele wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Sanjay Singh
> wrote:
> > What is
Hi Eric,
Is daughterboard ID burning inot EEPROM for WBX_NG supported in
gnuradio-3.3.0 ?.
Am unable to burn daughter board EEPROM for wbx_ng.
When i run ./burn-db-eeprom -A -f -t 'wbx_ng', i get error as 'name error'.
Am using USRP1 mother board.
Regards
Sanjay
___
I have done complete new installation of Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty and installed
Binary packege of GNURADIO(3.2.2).
I have checked under usrpm folder usrp_dbid.py file. Following are the lines
in the file
#
# Machine generated by gen_usrp_dbid.py from usrp_dbid.dat
# Do not edit by hand. All edits will
MIMO"0x0044
"TV Rx Rev 3 MIMO"0x0045
"WBX NG TX"0x0052
"WBX NG RX"0x0053
"Bitshark Rx" 0x0070
Regards
sanjay
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Jason Abele wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Sanjay Singh
> wrote:
&g
= 0x0050
> WBX_LO_RX= 0x0051
> XCVR2450_TX = 0x0060
> XCVR2450_RX = 0x0061
> EXPERIMENTAL_TX = 0xfffe
> EXPERIMENTAL_RX = 0x
>
>
> Can you please tell me why these following daughterboard ID's are missing
> in usrp_dbid.py.
>
> "TV Rx
Hi Marcus,
uname -m is returning i686.
Regards
Sanjay
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Sanjay Singh
wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> I have followed below set of lines from gnuradio build guide after installing
> Fedora-13.
>
>
> # yum install gnuradio usrp
>
> # yum gr
Hi All,
I have USRP1(4.5 Version) purchased from Matt Ettus around 2 years back.
Am interested to sell them at half price. I have two mother boards with four
daughter boards. I had purchased it for experimenting MIMO based designs.
Since am not at all using them, now am planning to sell them. Boa
Hi all,
Am disappointed with the way GNURadio is getting into.
I see all the discussion around is to promote the products of Ettus
Research.
Agreed!. Great work from Ettus Research.
But there are many boards available which are far better in capability vs
price. I don't want to mention them her
ve proper solution rather patches.
S--
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Brian Padalino wrote:
> I changed the subject to better match the tone of the email.
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Sanjay Singh
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Am disappointed with the
Its not about talking high. Its community of people trying hard to press
Ettus Research products. Putting people down is not the motto of GNURadio.
Regrading putting off from the list: Discussion is on for open source
platform. This is GNURadio platform. Here discussions are open for Ettus
Researc
3AM +0530, Sanjay Singh wrote:
> > Its not about talking high. Its community of people trying hard to press
> Ettus
> > Research products. Putting people down is not the motto of GNURadio.
> >
> > Regrading putting off from the list: Discussion is on for open source
&g
Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 09:35 PM, Sanjay Singh wrote:
> > Hi Marcus,
> >
> > Regarding your queries
> >
> > o Interface with whatever RF hardware is developed above
> > o Do the required DDC and CIC Decimatio
Your comment
"some of the projects that have been cooking over the last several years
will get some exposure"
is not true. Don't be so biased to under estimate work.
I would suggest to go to reputed institute to prove yourself rather honking
your capability!
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 1:13 AM
19 AM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Sanjay Singh
> wrote:
> > Your comment
> >
> > "some of the projects that have been cooking over the last several years
> > will get some exposure"
> >
> > is not true. Don't be so
ge on common platform to build a great solution.
All are welcome the the new project.
S--
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Sanjay Singh
> wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > I understand your concern. I agree with you.
> >
17 matches
Mail list logo
