Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Thread Safety

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:09:02AM -0500, Krzysztof Kamieniecki wrote: > > Eric Blossom wrote: > > > I was thinking about something slightly more complicated, with a set of > shadow data members that would be protected by the mutex, and copied to the > normal data members at the top of the work

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: FSK now (really) working at 100kbit/sec

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Blossom
Matt and I spent some time looking at the FSK code over the weekend. I made a couple of changes: reduced the gain in the tx module, fixed the problem in gr_simple_correlator.cc that was having it return after processing only a single sample (ooops!), and added a -N option (no graphs) to fsk_tx.py

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'PyEventBinder'

2005-02-28 Thread Rajaprabhu T.L.
Hi, I'm using the latest version of wxpython. I have tried removing python completely and reinstall again. But still i'm having same error: File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gnuradio/wxgui/fftsink.py", line 89, in ? EVT_DATA_EVENT = wx.PyEventBinder (myDATA_EVENT, 0) AttributeErro

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'PyEventBinder'

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:08:01AM -0800, Rajaprabhu T.L. wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the latest version of wxpython. I have tried > removing python completely and reinstall again. > > But still i'm having same error: > > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gnuradio/wxgui/fftsink.py",

Re: [opensdr] Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'PyEventBinder'

2005-02-28 Thread Rajaprabhu T.L.
Hi Eric, I installed wxpython only couple of weeks before. It was 2.5 version. There is no other version of wxpython in the system. Raja --- Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:08:01AM -0800, Rajaprabhu > T.L. wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using the latest versio

[Discuss-gnuradio] Fwd: Re: FSK now (really) working at 100kbit/sec

2005-02-28 Thread Bob Vincent
Subject: Re: FSK now (really) working at 100kbit/sec Matt and I spent some time looking at the FSK code over the weekend. Thanks. The gr_simple_correlator fix makes it work a lot better. I made a couple of changes: reduced the gain in the tx module, fixed the problem in gr_simple_correlator.cc

[Discuss-gnuradio] Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread Bob Vincent
FYI, I just did a clean CVS checkout. The directories don't have Makefile.in, so I copied from the versions in the tarfiles. ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Re: [opensdr] Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'PyEventBinder'

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:10:45AM -0800, Rajaprabhu T.L. wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I installed wxpython only couple of weeks before. It > was 2.5 version. There is no other version of wxpython > in the system. > > Raja OK. Can you try this experiment for me? $ python Python 2.3.4 (#2, Aug 19 200

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Fwd: Re: FSK now (really) working at 100kbit/sec

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:28:50PM -0500, Bob Vincent wrote: > > >Subject: Re: FSK now (really) working at 100kbit/sec > >Matt and I spent some time looking at the FSK code over the weekend. > > Thanks. The gr_simple_correlator fix makes it work a lot better. > > CPU problem also seems fixed. G

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread Matt Ettus
Quoting Bob Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > FYI, I just did a clean CVS checkout. The directories don't have > Makefile.in, so I copied from the versions in the tarfiles. When using CVS, run ./bootstrap from the top-level directory. That will create the Makefile.in files. Then run ./configure.

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread Robert McGwier
Is this bug driving you crazy yet Eric? ;-) Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Vincent Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 8:08 PM To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Makefile.in FYI, I just did a clean CVS checkout.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:43:02PM -, Robert McGwier wrote: > Is this bug driving you crazy yet Eric? > > ;-) > > Bob Just about ;-) Have you tried Josh Lackey's suggested fix? If so, did it work? Eric ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:07:35PM -0500, Bob Vincent wrote: > FYI, I just did a clean CVS checkout. The directories don't have > Makefile.in, so I copied from the versions in the tarfiles. The Makefile.in's are not kept in CVS. The easiest way is to use gr-build http://comsec.com/wiki?HowtoB

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread Rahul Dhar
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:17:15PM -0800, Matt Ettus wrote: > Quoting Bob Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > FYI, I just did a clean CVS checkout. The directories don't have > > Makefile.in, so I copied from the versions in the tarfiles. > > > When using CVS, run ./bootstrap from the top-level d

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Fwd: Re: FSK now (really) working at 100kbit/sec

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:28:50PM -0500, Bob Vincent wrote: > > > HOWEVER, there still seems to be a problem with the USRP decimating filter. > It is more apparent if the data going in is all zeros or ones, but the same > thing happens as before. > Takes longer for the sidebands to build up, bu

[Discuss-gnuradio] Missing Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread Joshua Lackey
Does anyone else have to "./bootstrap" twice in a freshly checked-out tree? I'm wondering if it is just my setup, but I have to "./bootstrap; ./bootstrap" or else the Makefile.in doesn't appear. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/gnuradio/tmp> cvs -d :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/gnuradio co gnur

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Missing Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread mgray
Yes, I have to do that with FC3 and the latest patches. It reports the same error you are showing below. On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Joshua Lackey wrote: > Does anyone else have to "./bootstrap" twice in a freshly checked-out > tree? > > I'm wondering if it is just my setup, but I have to "./bootstr

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Missing Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:32:24PM -0800, Joshua Lackey wrote: > Does anyone else have to "./bootstrap" twice in a freshly checked-out > tree? > > I'm wondering if it is just my setup, but I have to "./bootstrap; > ./bootstrap" or else the Makefile.in doesn't appear. > Yes, others are seeing thi

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread Robert McGwier
Same here but I have not tried JL's fix. I missed it somehow but that is what the archive is for! Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rahul Dhar Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 9:15 PM To: Matt Ettus Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Subject: Re

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Makefile.in

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:49:42PM -, Robert McGwier wrote: > Same here but I have not tried JL's fix. I missed it somehow but > that is what the archive is for! > > Bob I've changed all the bootstrap's to use the ordering suggested by JL. Let me know how it goes... Eric

[Discuss-gnuradio] bytes_to_syms

2005-02-28 Thread Rahul Dhar
Is "bytes_to_syms" a symbol exported by gr_bytes_to_syms? I'm trying to understand the framing mechanism. Thanks, -Rahul -- Rahul Dhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually, my goal is to have a sandwich named after me. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Thread Safety

2005-02-28 Thread Krzysztof Kamieniecki
Eric Blossom wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:09:02AM -0500, Krzysztof Kamieniecki wrote: >>Do or could the messages have a timestamp indicating when they should be >>performed? > > > I was thinking along the line of a timer that sends "Timer Fired" > messages to whoever you want when you want.