> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As always, there are lot of differences between processors.
> Some of the VIA's are dogs, other's aren't so bad. We've run
> the USRP and
> gmsk2 code on one particular compact VIA board, and it wasn't
> horrible.
> We were able to r
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:38:52PM -0500, Jim Hanlon wrote:
> I tried to get the USRP talking to an 800MHz VIA fanless industrial
> control computer, with expansion card to get USB 2.0 performance. I
> found that gnuradio installed and ran OK, but USRP performance
> consistently exhibited USB over
nsfers to/from the USB
> bus and your slowish CPU.
> HTH
> Jim Hanlon
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > g] On Behalf Of Lee Patton
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:19 PM
> > To: Eric Blossom
&
CTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> g] On Behalf Of Lee Patton
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:19 PM
> To: Eric Blossom
> Cc: Discuss gnuradio
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Embedded control of USRP
>
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:20 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> &
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:18:55PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:20 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > ... unless you're a glutton for punishment, don't get the Celeron
> > version, spend the extra bucks and get the Pentium M.
>
> Besides the dearth of on-board cache, what are th
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:20 -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> ... unless you're a glutton for punishment, don't get the Celeron
> version, spend the extra bucks and get the Pentium M.
Besides the dearth of on-board cache, what are the other drawbacks of a
Celeron?
To fit the dimensional requirement I
> A couple of observations: no floating point
>> Have you tried the geode nx?
The MIT "$100 Laptop" uses the AMD Geode [EMAIL PROTECTED] See:
http://wiki.laptop.org/wiki/Hardware_specification
According to Jim Gettys, the reason is because it's the only low-power
processor they could find tha
Thanks, Chuck. Very useful to know.
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 15:34 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 10:22 -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
>
> > Also, did you consider the power consumption of the usrp? I don't know
> > if someone measured it, but this might also be a problem for you,
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:33:26PM -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> Hi Eric
>
> On 4/3/06, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:22:01AM -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> > > Hi Lee,
> > >
> > > We are also looking into similar things, though we don't have the
> > > power
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 10:22 -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> Also, did you consider the power consumption of the usrp? I don't know
> if someone measured it, but this might also be a problem for you,
> i.e., finding a battery which supports the usrp over a longer time.
>
I use a usrp with battery a
Hi Eric
On 4/3/06, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:22:01AM -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > We are also looking into similar things, though we don't have the
> > power constraints which will be difficult to meet. We are currently
> > looking at a
dio
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Embedded control of USRP
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 11:20:34 -0700
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 01:00:07PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Clark. Basically, the project we're working on
> involves putting the USRP on a small UAV ("A" as
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 10:22 -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> We are also looking into similar things, though we don't have the
> power constraints which will be difficult to meet. We are currently
> looking at a micro-atx solution with an amd geod nx processor since
> this one is compatib
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:22:01AM -0700, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> We are also looking into similar things, though we don't have the
> power constraints which will be difficult to meet. We are currently
> looking at a micro-atx solution with an amd geod nx processor since
> this one is c
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 01:00:07PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Clark. Basically, the project we're working on
> involves putting the USRP on a small UAV ("A" as in "aerial" not
> "autonomous"). So, weight and power consumption are key. The hydraxc
> looks very cool. However
Hi Lee,
We are also looking into similar things, though we don't have the
power constraints which will be difficult to meet. We are currently
looking at a micro-atx solution with an amd geod nx processor since
this one is compatible with the amd athlon mobile. this should make it
easy to have a ru
Thanks for the reply, Clark. Basically, the project we're working on
involves putting the USRP on a small UAV ("A" as in "aerial" not
"autonomous"). So, weight and power consumption are key. The hydraxc
looks very cool. However, I think we can go larger. And, for the first
cut at a solution, we
Thanks very much for the reply, Pete. I believe I have been abusing the
terminology here. According to Wikipedia:
" An embedded system is a special-purpose computer system, which is
completely encapsulated by the device it controls. An embedded system
has specific requirements and performs pre-
Lee,
I am very much interested in the same. Specifically, I'd like to get it on
embedded Linux running off a virtex-4 FPGA. This module from
hydraxc(http://www.hydraxc.com/) has a USB2.0 port and is the size of a
stick of gum.
Seems like one should be able to connect this to a USRP with a 100
19 matches
Mail list logo
